Detail
Článek
Web zdroj
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in the Czech Republic [Škála vnímaného stresu: psychometrické charakteristiky české verze]

Nikol Figalová, Miroslav Charvát

. 2021 ; 65 (1) : 46-59.

Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22014020

Objectives. The aim of this study was to create a Czech translation of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), to assess its psychometric properties on a representative sample of the Czech general adult population, and to compare the original 14-item version (PSS-14) with the shortened 10-item (PSS-10) and four-item (PSS-4) versions. Sample and setting. Two pilot studies were conducted to create the final Czech translation of the scale (n = 365 and n = 420). The final version of the Czech PSS was administered to a sample of the Czech general adult population (n = 1725 of whom 981 were women, M = 44.32, SD = 12.8). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) or the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were administered alongside the PSS to a part of the sample. A retest measurement after 14 days was conducted (n = 159). Statistical analysis. Using the confirmatory factor analysis, the one-factor, two-factor and bifactor models were compared. The internal consistency, stability in time, and convergent validity of the scale, as well as the known-group differences, were assessed. The three versions of the PSS were compared. Results. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the bifactor model of the PSS-14 and PSS-10, and the two-factor model of the PSS-4. All versions of the scale showed good internal consistency and stability in time. There was a moderate to strong positive correlation between the PSS and the BDI-II and STAI. Differences based on age, sex, education level, and situational factors were found. Overall, the PSS-10 showed the best psychometric properties of all three versions of the scale.

Škála vnímaného stresu: psychometrické charakteristiky české verze

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22014020
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220605105814.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220527s2021 xr a fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.51561/cspsych.65.1.46 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng $b cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Figalová, Nikol $7 xx0273369 $u Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Psychology
245    14
$a The perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in the Czech Republic / $c Nikol Figalová, Miroslav Charvát
246    31
$a Škála vnímaného stresu: psychometrické charakteristiky české verze
504    __
$a Literatura
520    3_
$a Objectives. The aim of this study was to create a Czech translation of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), to assess its psychometric properties on a representative sample of the Czech general adult population, and to compare the original 14-item version (PSS-14) with the shortened 10-item (PSS-10) and four-item (PSS-4) versions. Sample and setting. Two pilot studies were conducted to create the final Czech translation of the scale (n = 365 and n = 420). The final version of the Czech PSS was administered to a sample of the Czech general adult population (n = 1725 of whom 981 were women, M = 44.32, SD = 12.8). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) or the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were administered alongside the PSS to a part of the sample. A retest measurement after 14 days was conducted (n = 159). Statistical analysis. Using the confirmatory factor analysis, the one-factor, two-factor and bifactor models were compared. The internal consistency, stability in time, and convergent validity of the scale, as well as the known-group differences, were assessed. The three versions of the PSS were compared. Results. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the bifactor model of the PSS-14 and PSS-10, and the two-factor model of the PSS-4. All versions of the scale showed good internal consistency and stability in time. There was a moderate to strong positive correlation between the PSS and the BDI-II and STAI. Differences based on age, sex, education level, and situational factors were found. Overall, the PSS-10 showed the best psychometric properties of all three versions of the scale.
700    1_
$a Charvát, Miroslav, $d 1978- $7 mzk2007417174 $u Department of Psychology, Palacký University Olomouc
773    0_
$t Československá psychologie $x 0009-062X $g Roč. 65, č. 1 (2021), s. 46-59 $w MED00010994
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $c 618 $y 0 $z 0
990    __
$a 20220527095737 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220605110841 $b ABA008
999    __
$a min $b bmc $g 1797514 $s 1165237
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 65 $c 1 $d 46-59 $i 0009-062X $m Československá psychologie $x MED00010994
LZP    __
$a NLK 2022-23/dk

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...