PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The preferred treatment of giant cell tumor of bone is curettage with the use of local adjuvant. If the tumor spreads beyond the bone into soft tissues, en bloc excision should be performed. Intralesional curettage allows joint preservation, but it is associated with a high recurrence rate. The purpose of the study was to identify the risk factors for local recurrence and to compare the functional outcomes after both types of surgical procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group included 16 patients (5 women, 11 men) with giant cell tumor of bone in distal forearm treated at the First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne s University Hospital Brno in 2005-2019. The mean age of patients was 38 years (22-53). The follow-up period was 6.75 years (2-15) on average. The most common location of the tumor was distal radius (14). In 6 patients denosumab treatment was indicated. Based on the obtained data, we compared the effects of gender, Campanacci grade, type of surgery and administration of denosumab on the risk of local recurrence. The functional outcomes were evaluated retrospectively based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system for upper limb salvage surgeries. RESULTS Resection and reconstruction using an osteocartilaginous allograft was performed in 9 patients. Seven patients were treated with tumor curettage with bone cement used to fill the cavity. The group of patients who underwent curettage showed a significantly higher mean MSTS score 89% compared to the group of patients with resection with the mean MSTS score 66% (P < 0.05). Local tumor recurrence was reported in 3 patients (18.75%). No statistically significant difference was found in gender, tumor grade, radicality of surgery or administration of targeted therapy with respect to the incidence of local recurrence. Altogether 6 complications (37.5%) were observed in the group. DISCUSSION The treatment of a giant cell tumor of bone aims to completely remove the tumor and to preserve the best possible function of the limb. The complications in distal forearm involve particularly an increase incidence of local recurrence and painful or limited range of motion of the wrist. Whereas curettage with the use of local adjuvant is burdened with a higher recurrence rate, resection with allograft reconstruction of bone defect is usually associated with poorer functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Tumor curettage using local adjuvant is preferred in a well-circumscribed tumor and offers an excellent functional outcome. En bloc tumor resection and reconstruction using an osteocartilaginous allograft is a suitable treatment option for a locally advanced tumor with a low risk of local recurrence. Key words: giant cell tumor of bone, distal radius, distal ulna, curettage, osteocartilaginous allograft.

1 ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv Anny v Brně Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Brno

Ústav patologie Fakultní nemocnice u sv Anny v Brně Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity Brno

Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in the Distal Radius and Ulna

000      

00000naa a2200000 a 4500

001      

bmc22016370

003      

CZ-PrNML

005      

20230224085007.0

007      

ta

008      

220714s2022 xr ad f 000 0|cze||

009      

AR

035    __

$a (PubMed)35815484

040    __

$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2

041    0_

$a cze $b eng

044    __

$a xr

100    1_

$a Mahdal, Michal $u I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $7 xx0254094

245    10

$a Léčba obrovskobuněčného kostního nádoru distálního radia a ulny / $c M. Mahdal, J. Jindra, I. Staniczková Zambo, L. Pazourek, L. Nachtnebl, T. Tomáš

246    31

$a [Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in the Distal Radius and Ulna]

520    9_

$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The preferred treatment of giant cell tumor of bone is curettage with the use of local adjuvant. If the tumor spreads beyond the bone into soft tissues, en bloc excision should be performed. Intralesional curettage allows joint preservation, but it is associated with a high recurrence rate. The purpose of the study was to identify the risk factors for local recurrence and to compare the functional outcomes after both types of surgical procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The group included 16 patients (5 women, 11 men) with giant cell tumor of bone in distal forearm treated at the First Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anne s University Hospital Brno in 2005-2019. The mean age of patients was 38 years (22-53). The follow-up period was 6.75 years (2-15) on average. The most common location of the tumor was distal radius (14). In 6 patients denosumab treatment was indicated. Based on the obtained data, we compared the effects of gender, Campanacci grade, type of surgery and administration of denosumab on the risk of local recurrence. The functional outcomes were evaluated retrospectively based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system for upper limb salvage surgeries. RESULTS Resection and reconstruction using an osteocartilaginous allograft was performed in 9 patients. Seven patients were treated with tumor curettage with bone cement used to fill the cavity. The group of patients who underwent curettage showed a significantly higher mean MSTS score 89% compared to the group of patients with resection with the mean MSTS score 66% (P < 0.05). Local tumor recurrence was reported in 3 patients (18.75%). No statistically significant difference was found in gender, tumor grade, radicality of surgery or administration of targeted therapy with respect to the incidence of local recurrence. Altogether 6 complications (37.5%) were observed in the group. DISCUSSION The treatment of a giant cell tumor of bone aims to completely remove the tumor and to preserve the best possible function of the limb. The complications in distal forearm involve particularly an increase incidence of local recurrence and painful or limited range of motion of the wrist. Whereas curettage with the use of local adjuvant is burdened with a higher recurrence rate, resection with allograft reconstruction of bone defect is usually associated with poorer functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Tumor curettage using local adjuvant is preferred in a well-circumscribed tumor and offers an excellent functional outcome. En bloc tumor resection and reconstruction using an osteocartilaginous allograft is a suitable treatment option for a locally advanced tumor with a low risk of local recurrence. Key words: giant cell tumor of bone, distal radius, distal ulna, curettage, osteocartilaginous allograft.

650    _2

$a dospělí $7 D000328

650    12

$a nádory kostí $x patologie $7 D001859

650    _2

$a denosumab $7 D000069448

650    _2

$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260

650    _2

$a následné studie $7 D005500

650    12

$a obrovskobuněčný nádor kosti $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D018212

650    _2

$a lidé $7 D006801

650    _2

$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297

650    _2

$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875

650    _2

$a radius $x chirurgie $7 D011884

650    _2

$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189

650    _2

$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896

650    _2

$a ulna $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D014457

650    _2

$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815

655    _2

$a časopisecké články $7 D016428

700    1_

$a Jindra, Jakub $u I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $7 xx0277027

700    1_

$a Zambo, Iva $u Ústav patologie, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $7 xx0211296

700    1_

$a Pazourek, Lukáš $u I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $7 xx0123254

700    1_

$a Nachtnebl, Luboš $u I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $7 xx0106708

700    1_

$a Tomáš, Tomáš, $u I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno $d 1968- $7 ola2006319238

773    0_

$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 89, č. 3 (2022), s. 188-192

856    41

$u https://achot.cz/pdfs/ach/2022/03/02.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný

910    __

$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0

990    __

$a 20220714 $b ABA008

991    __

$a 20230224084959 $b ABA008

999    __

$a ok $b bmc $g 1825265 $s 1167612

BAS    __

$a 3

BAS    __

$a PreBMC

BMC    __

$a 2022 $b 89 $c 3 $d 188-192 $e $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021

LZP    __

$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20220714