Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cytocompatibility and Bioactive Ion Release Profiles of Phosphoserine Bone Adhesive: Bridge from In Vitro to In Vivo

K. Vrchovecká, M. Pávková-Goldbergová, H. Engqvist, M. Pujari-Palmer

. 2022 ; 10 (4) : . [pub] 20220322

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017542

Grantová podpora
NU20-08-00149 Ministry of Health Research Programme 2020 - 2026
501100001729 Swedish Science Foundation
501100000811 European Institute of Innovation and Technology
0001 Viking Olov Bjork scholarship

One major challenge when developing new biomaterials is translating in vitro testing to in vivo models. We have recently shown that a single formulation of a bone tissue adhesive, phosphoserine modified cement (PMC), is safe and resorbable in vivo. Herein, we screened many new adhesive formulations, for cytocompatibility and bioactive ion release, with three cell lines: MDPC23 odontoblasts, MC3T3 preosteoblasts, and L929 fibroblasts. Most formulations were cytocompatible by indirect contact testing (ISO 10993-12). Formulations with larger amounts of phosphoserine (>50%) had delayed setting times, greater ion release, and cytotoxicity in vitro. The trends in ion release from the adhesive that were cured for 24 h (standard for in vitro) were similar to release from the adhesives cured only for 5-10 min (standard for in vivo), suggesting that we may be able to predict the material behavior in vivo, using in vitro methods. Adhesives containing calcium phosphate and silicate were both cytocompatible for seven days in direct contact with cell monolayers, and ion release increased the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in odontoblasts, but not pre-osteoblasts. This is the first study evaluating how PMC formulation affects osteogenic cell differentiation (ALP), cytocompatibility, and ion release, using in situ curing conditions similar to conditions in vivo.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017542
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220720100254.0
007      
ta
008      
220718s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/biomedicines10040736 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35453486
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Vrchovecká, Kateřina $u Department of Pathology Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000233258855
245    10
$a Cytocompatibility and Bioactive Ion Release Profiles of Phosphoserine Bone Adhesive: Bridge from In Vitro to In Vivo / $c K. Vrchovecká, M. Pávková-Goldbergová, H. Engqvist, M. Pujari-Palmer
520    9_
$a One major challenge when developing new biomaterials is translating in vitro testing to in vivo models. We have recently shown that a single formulation of a bone tissue adhesive, phosphoserine modified cement (PMC), is safe and resorbable in vivo. Herein, we screened many new adhesive formulations, for cytocompatibility and bioactive ion release, with three cell lines: MDPC23 odontoblasts, MC3T3 preosteoblasts, and L929 fibroblasts. Most formulations were cytocompatible by indirect contact testing (ISO 10993-12). Formulations with larger amounts of phosphoserine (>50%) had delayed setting times, greater ion release, and cytotoxicity in vitro. The trends in ion release from the adhesive that were cured for 24 h (standard for in vitro) were similar to release from the adhesives cured only for 5-10 min (standard for in vivo), suggesting that we may be able to predict the material behavior in vivo, using in vitro methods. Adhesives containing calcium phosphate and silicate were both cytocompatible for seven days in direct contact with cell monolayers, and ion release increased the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in odontoblasts, but not pre-osteoblasts. This is the first study evaluating how PMC formulation affects osteogenic cell differentiation (ALP), cytocompatibility, and ion release, using in situ curing conditions similar to conditions in vivo.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pávková-Goldbergová, Monika $u Department of Pathology Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Engqvist, Håkan $u Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Applied Material Science, Uppsala University, 75103 Uppsala, Sweden
700    1_
$a Pujari-Palmer, Michael $u Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Applied Material Science, Uppsala University, 75103 Uppsala, Sweden $1 https://orcid.org/0000000170042853
773    0_
$w MED00205373 $t Biomedicines $x 2227-9059 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35453486 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220720100249 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1816639 $s 1168784
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 10 $c 4 $e 20220322 $i 2227-9059 $m Biomedicines $n Biomedicines $x MED00205373
GRA    __
$a NU20-08-00149 $p Ministry of Health Research Programme 2020 - 2026
GRA    __
$a 501100001729 $p Swedish Science Foundation
GRA    __
$a 501100000811 $p European Institute of Innovation and Technology
GRA    __
$a 0001 $p Viking Olov Bjork scholarship
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...