Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of multicenter MRI protocols for visualizing the spinal cord gray matter

J. Cohen-Adad, E. Alonso-Ortiz, S. Alley, MM. Lagana, F. Baglio, SJ. Vannesjo, H. Karbasforoushan, M. Seif, AC. Seifert, J. Xu, JW. Kim, R. Labounek, L. Vojtíšek, M. Dostál, J. Valošek, RS. Samson, F. Grussu, M. Battiston, CAM. Gandini...

. 2022 ; 88 (2) : 849-859. [pub] 20220405

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017813

Grantová podpora
FDN-143263 CIHR - Canada
K01 NS105160 NINDS NIH HHS - United States
R&D 03/10/RAG0449 Department of Health - United Kingdom

PURPOSE: Spinal cord gray-matter imaging is valuable for a number of applications, but remains challenging. The purpose of this work was to compare various MRI protocols at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T for visualizing the gray matter. METHODS: In vivo data of the cervical spinal cord were collected from nine different imaging centers. Data processing consisted of automatically segmenting the spinal cord and its gray matter and co-registering back-to-back scans. We computed the SNR using two methods (SNR_single using a single scan and SNR_diff using the difference between back-to-back scans) and the white/gray matter contrast-to-noise ratio per unit time. Synthetic phantom data were generated to evaluate the metrics performance. Experienced radiologists qualitatively scored the images. We ran the same processing on an open-access multicenter data set of the spinal cord MRI (N = 267 participants). RESULTS: Qualitative assessments indicated comparable image quality for 3T and 7T scans. Spatial resolution was higher at higher field strength, and image quality at 1.5 T was found to be moderate to low. The proposed quantitative metrics were found to be robust to underlying changes to the SNR and contrast; however, the SNR_single method lacked accuracy when there were excessive partial-volume effects. CONCLUSION: We propose quality assessment criteria and metrics for gray-matter visualization and apply them to different protocols. The proposed criteria and metrics, the analyzed protocols, and our open-source code can serve as a benchmark for future optimization of spinal cord gray-matter imaging protocols.

Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute Department of Radiology Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA

Brain MRI 3T Research Center C Mondino National Neurological Institute Pavia Italy

Center for Medical Imaging Computing Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK

Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy

Department of Neurophysics Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany

Department of Physics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience Department of Pediatrics Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA

e Health Center Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona Spain

Functional Neuroimaging Unit CRIUGM University of Montreal Montreal Canada

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program Northwestern University School of Medicine Chicago IL USA

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS Milan Italy

Mila Quebec AI Institute Montreal Canada

MR Clinical Development Philips North America Gainesville FL USA

MR Clinical Science Philips Canada Mississauga Canada

MR Clinical Science Philips UK Surrey UK

NeuroPoly Lab Institute of Biomedical Engineering Polytechnique Montreal Montreal Canada

Queen Square MS Centre UCL Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London UK

Radiomics Group Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain

Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Wellcome Center for Integrative Neuroimaging FMRIB University of Oxford John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017813
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250423101444.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mrm.29249 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35476875
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Cohen-Adad, Julien $u NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada $u Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada $u Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000336629532
245    10
$a Comparison of multicenter MRI protocols for visualizing the spinal cord gray matter / $c J. Cohen-Adad, E. Alonso-Ortiz, S. Alley, MM. Lagana, F. Baglio, SJ. Vannesjo, H. Karbasforoushan, M. Seif, AC. Seifert, J. Xu, JW. Kim, R. Labounek, L. Vojtíšek, M. Dostál, J. Valošek, RS. Samson, F. Grussu, M. Battiston, CAM. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, MC. Yiannakas, G. Gilbert, T. Schneider, B. Johnson, F. Prados
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Spinal cord gray-matter imaging is valuable for a number of applications, but remains challenging. The purpose of this work was to compare various MRI protocols at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T for visualizing the gray matter. METHODS: In vivo data of the cervical spinal cord were collected from nine different imaging centers. Data processing consisted of automatically segmenting the spinal cord and its gray matter and co-registering back-to-back scans. We computed the SNR using two methods (SNR_single using a single scan and SNR_diff using the difference between back-to-back scans) and the white/gray matter contrast-to-noise ratio per unit time. Synthetic phantom data were generated to evaluate the metrics performance. Experienced radiologists qualitatively scored the images. We ran the same processing on an open-access multicenter data set of the spinal cord MRI (N = 267 participants). RESULTS: Qualitative assessments indicated comparable image quality for 3T and 7T scans. Spatial resolution was higher at higher field strength, and image quality at 1.5 T was found to be moderate to low. The proposed quantitative metrics were found to be robust to underlying changes to the SNR and contrast; however, the SNR_single method lacked accuracy when there were excessive partial-volume effects. CONCLUSION: We propose quality assessment criteria and metrics for gray-matter visualization and apply them to different protocols. The proposed criteria and metrics, the analyzed protocols, and our open-source code can serve as a benchmark for future optimization of spinal cord gray-matter imaging protocols.
650    12
$a krční mícha $7 D066193
650    _2
$a šedá hmota $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D066128
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a multicentrické studie jako téma $7 D015337
650    _2
$a mícha $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013116
650    12
$a bílá hmota $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D066127
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Alonso-Ortiz, Eva $u NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000165907234
700    1_
$a Alley, Stephanie $u NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada
700    1_
$a Lagana, Maria Marcella $u IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Baglio, Francesca $u IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Vannesjo, Signe Johanna $u Wellcome Center for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK $u Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324324192
700    1_
$a Karbasforoushan, Haleh $u Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA $u Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320329703
700    1_
$a Seif, Maryam $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland $u Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
700    1_
$a Seifert, Alan C $u Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000178774813
700    1_
$a Xu, Junqian $u Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
700    1_
$a Kim, Joo-Won $u Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
700    1_
$a Labounek, René $u Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304391304
700    1_
$a Vojtíšek, Lubomír $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0331412
700    1_
$a Dostál, Marek $u Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Valošek, Jan $u Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000273984990 $7 xx0274853
700    1_
$a Samson, Rebecca S $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Grussu, Francesco $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK $u Radiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000209453909
700    1_
$a Battiston, Marco $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322312251
700    1_
$a Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A M $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK $u Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy $u Brain MRI 3T Research Center, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy
700    1_
$a Yiannakas, Marios C $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Gilbert, Guillaume $u MR Clinical Science, Philips Canada, Mississauga, Canada
700    1_
$a Schneider, Torben $u MR Clinical Science, Philips UK, Surrey, UK
700    1_
$a Johnson, Brian $u MR Clinical Development, Philips North America, Gainesville, FL, USA
700    1_
$a Prados, Ferran $u Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK $u e-Health Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain $u Center for Medical Imaging Computing, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
773    0_
$w MED00003172 $t Magnetic resonance in medicine $x 1522-2594 $g Roč. 88, č. 2 (2022), s. 849-859
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35476875 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250423101445 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821759 $s 1169056
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 88 $c 2 $d 849-859 $e 20220405 $i 1522-2594 $m Magnetic resonance in medicine $n Magn Reson Med $x MED00003172
GRA    __
$a FDN-143263 $p CIHR $2 Canada
GRA    __
$a K01 NS105160 $p NINDS NIH HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a R&D 03/10/RAG0449 $p Department of Health $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...