• Something wrong with this record ?

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac arrest patients without return of spontaneous circulation

D. Rob, P. Kavalkova, J. Smalcova, A. Kral, T. Kovarnik, D. Zemanek, O. Franěk, O. Smid, S. Havranek, A. Linhart, J. Belohlavek

. 2022 ; 175 (-) : 133-141. [pub] 20220330

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine coronary angiography (CAG) findings, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on admission to hospital. METHODS: We analyzed the OHCA register and compared CAG, PCI, and outcome data in patients with and without ROSC on admission to hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2020, 697 OHCA patients were analyzed. Of these, 163 (23%) did not have ROSC at admission. Patients without ROSC were younger (59 vs. 61 years, p = 0.001) and had a longer resuscitation time (62 vs. 18 minutes, p < 0.001) than patients with ROSC. Significant coronary artery disease was highly prevalent in both groups (65% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Patients without ROSC had higher rates of acute coronary occlusions (42% vs. 33%, p = 0.046), specifically affecting the left main stem (16% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). PCI was performed in 81 patients (50%) without ROSC and in 295 (55%) with ROSC (p = 0.21). The success rate was 86% in patients without ROSC and 90% in patients with ROSC (p = 0.33). Thirty-day survival was 24% in patients without ROSC and 70% in patients with ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without ROSC on admission to hospital had higher acute coronary occlusion rates than patients with prehospital ROSC. PCI is feasible with a high success rate in patients without ROSC. Despite prolonged resuscitation times, meaningful survival in patients admitted without ROSC is achievable.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018266
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134649.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.03.027 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35367316
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Rob, Daniel $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: daniel.rob@vfn.cz
245    10
$a Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac arrest patients without return of spontaneous circulation / $c D. Rob, P. Kavalkova, J. Smalcova, A. Kral, T. Kovarnik, D. Zemanek, O. Franěk, O. Smid, S. Havranek, A. Linhart, J. Belohlavek
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine coronary angiography (CAG) findings, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on admission to hospital. METHODS: We analyzed the OHCA register and compared CAG, PCI, and outcome data in patients with and without ROSC on admission to hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2020, 697 OHCA patients were analyzed. Of these, 163 (23%) did not have ROSC at admission. Patients without ROSC were younger (59 vs. 61 years, p = 0.001) and had a longer resuscitation time (62 vs. 18 minutes, p < 0.001) than patients with ROSC. Significant coronary artery disease was highly prevalent in both groups (65% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Patients without ROSC had higher rates of acute coronary occlusions (42% vs. 33%, p = 0.046), specifically affecting the left main stem (16% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). PCI was performed in 81 patients (50%) without ROSC and in 295 (55%) with ROSC (p = 0.21). The success rate was 86% in patients without ROSC and 90% in patients with ROSC (p = 0.33). Thirty-day survival was 24% in patients without ROSC and 70% in patients with ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without ROSC on admission to hospital had higher acute coronary occlusion rates than patients with prehospital ROSC. PCI is feasible with a high success rate in patients without ROSC. Despite prolonged resuscitation times, meaningful survival in patients admitted without ROSC is achievable.
650    12
$a kardiopulmonální resuscitace $x metody $7 D016887
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x metody $7 D017023
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a zástava srdce mimo nemocnici $x terapie $7 D058687
650    12
$a koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D062645
650    _2
$a obnovení spontánní cirukulace $7 D000084102
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kavalkova, Petra $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smalcova, Jana $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kral, Ales $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kovarnik, Tomas $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zemanek, David $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Franěk, Ondrej $u Prague Emergency Medical Service, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smid, Ondrej $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Havranek, Stepan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Linhart, Ales $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Belohlavek, Jan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00004106 $t Resuscitation $x 1873-1570 $g Roč. 175, č. - (2022), s. 133-141
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35367316 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134643 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822051 $s 1169509
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 175 $c - $d 133-141 $e 20220330 $i 1873-1570 $m Resuscitation $n Resuscitation $x MED00004106
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...