-
Something wrong with this record ?
Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac arrest patients without return of spontaneous circulation
D. Rob, P. Kavalkova, J. Smalcova, A. Kral, T. Kovarnik, D. Zemanek, O. Franěk, O. Smid, S. Havranek, A. Linhart, J. Belohlavek
Language English Country Ireland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation * methods MeSH
- Coronary Angiography methods MeSH
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention * methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Return of Spontaneous Circulation MeSH
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest * therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine coronary angiography (CAG) findings, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on admission to hospital. METHODS: We analyzed the OHCA register and compared CAG, PCI, and outcome data in patients with and without ROSC on admission to hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2020, 697 OHCA patients were analyzed. Of these, 163 (23%) did not have ROSC at admission. Patients without ROSC were younger (59 vs. 61 years, p = 0.001) and had a longer resuscitation time (62 vs. 18 minutes, p < 0.001) than patients with ROSC. Significant coronary artery disease was highly prevalent in both groups (65% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Patients without ROSC had higher rates of acute coronary occlusions (42% vs. 33%, p = 0.046), specifically affecting the left main stem (16% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). PCI was performed in 81 patients (50%) without ROSC and in 295 (55%) with ROSC (p = 0.21). The success rate was 86% in patients without ROSC and 90% in patients with ROSC (p = 0.33). Thirty-day survival was 24% in patients without ROSC and 70% in patients with ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without ROSC on admission to hospital had higher acute coronary occlusion rates than patients with prehospital ROSC. PCI is feasible with a high success rate in patients without ROSC. Despite prolonged resuscitation times, meaningful survival in patients admitted without ROSC is achievable.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018266
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134649.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 ie f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.03.027 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35367316
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Rob, Daniel $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: daniel.rob@vfn.cz
- 245 10
- $a Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac arrest patients without return of spontaneous circulation / $c D. Rob, P. Kavalkova, J. Smalcova, A. Kral, T. Kovarnik, D. Zemanek, O. Franěk, O. Smid, S. Havranek, A. Linhart, J. Belohlavek
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine coronary angiography (CAG) findings, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on admission to hospital. METHODS: We analyzed the OHCA register and compared CAG, PCI, and outcome data in patients with and without ROSC on admission to hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2020, 697 OHCA patients were analyzed. Of these, 163 (23%) did not have ROSC at admission. Patients without ROSC were younger (59 vs. 61 years, p = 0.001) and had a longer resuscitation time (62 vs. 18 minutes, p < 0.001) than patients with ROSC. Significant coronary artery disease was highly prevalent in both groups (65% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Patients without ROSC had higher rates of acute coronary occlusions (42% vs. 33%, p = 0.046), specifically affecting the left main stem (16% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). PCI was performed in 81 patients (50%) without ROSC and in 295 (55%) with ROSC (p = 0.21). The success rate was 86% in patients without ROSC and 90% in patients with ROSC (p = 0.33). Thirty-day survival was 24% in patients without ROSC and 70% in patients with ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without ROSC on admission to hospital had higher acute coronary occlusion rates than patients with prehospital ROSC. PCI is feasible with a high success rate in patients without ROSC. Despite prolonged resuscitation times, meaningful survival in patients admitted without ROSC is achievable.
- 650 12
- $a kardiopulmonální resuscitace $x metody $7 D016887
- 650 _2
- $a koronární angiografie $x metody $7 D017023
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a zástava srdce mimo nemocnici $x terapie $7 D058687
- 650 12
- $a koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D062645
- 650 _2
- $a obnovení spontánní cirukulace $7 D000084102
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kavalkova, Petra $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Smalcova, Jana $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kral, Ales $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kovarnik, Tomas $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zemanek, David $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Franěk, Ondrej $u Prague Emergency Medical Service, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Smid, Ondrej $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Havranek, Stepan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Linhart, Ales $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Belohlavek, Jan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004106 $t Resuscitation $x 1873-1570 $g Roč. 175, č. - (2022), s. 133-141
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35367316 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134643 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822051 $s 1169509
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 175 $c - $d 133-141 $e 20220330 $i 1873-1570 $m Resuscitation $n Resuscitation $x MED00004106
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720