-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pregnancy Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Single-Center Experience
J. Chrastina, I. Dolezalova, Z. Novak, E. Pešlová, M. Brazdil
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Cesarean Section MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Placenta MeSH
- Drug Resistant Epilepsy * therapy MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation * adverse effects methods MeSH
- Pregnancy Outcome MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been employed worldwide as an adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. However, the mechanisms of VNS action potentially increase the risk of obstetric complications. The study presents the long-term single-center experience with pregnancies and childbirth in women with VNS for refractory epilepsy based on prospectively collected epileptologic data and a retrospective analysis of pregnancy, childbirth, and data about long-term child development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a group of patients with VNS implanted for refractory epilepsy between October 1999 and January 2018, all the women of childbearing age (younger than 40 years) were identified. After checking their hospital records for data about any pregnancies, the women with confirmed childbirth during active VNS stimulation and their general practitioners were interviewed based on a prepared questionnaire regarding their gynecologic history, the course of pregnancy and childbirth, gestational week, birth weight and length, any congenital anomalies of the child, and the child's psychomotor development, school performance, and somatic health problems. RESULTS: From the group of 257 patients implanted with VNS for refractory epilepsy, 4 women (1.5%) became pregnant and gave birth (all on polypharmacotherapy). The mean interval from VNS implantation to birth was 44.3 months. Slight seizure worsening during the last trimester was reported in one woman. In one patient, acute caesarean section was required due to placental separation. Planned birth induction and caesarean section were used in the other two women because of their seizure disorder. No malfunction of the stimulation system was detected during pregnancy or after birth. No congenital malformations were observed. The two children who were of school age at the time of this study require special schooling. CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed a high rate of obstetric interventions in patients with VNS. Although no teratogenic effect of VNS has been proven, the higher incidence of children exposed to VNS needing special education requires attention.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018612
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134911.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1055/s-0041-1730966 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34496415
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Chrastina, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Pregnancy Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Single-Center Experience / $c J. Chrastina, I. Dolezalova, Z. Novak, E. Pešlová, M. Brazdil
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been employed worldwide as an adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. However, the mechanisms of VNS action potentially increase the risk of obstetric complications. The study presents the long-term single-center experience with pregnancies and childbirth in women with VNS for refractory epilepsy based on prospectively collected epileptologic data and a retrospective analysis of pregnancy, childbirth, and data about long-term child development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a group of patients with VNS implanted for refractory epilepsy between October 1999 and January 2018, all the women of childbearing age (younger than 40 years) were identified. After checking their hospital records for data about any pregnancies, the women with confirmed childbirth during active VNS stimulation and their general practitioners were interviewed based on a prepared questionnaire regarding their gynecologic history, the course of pregnancy and childbirth, gestational week, birth weight and length, any congenital anomalies of the child, and the child's psychomotor development, school performance, and somatic health problems. RESULTS: From the group of 257 patients implanted with VNS for refractory epilepsy, 4 women (1.5%) became pregnant and gave birth (all on polypharmacotherapy). The mean interval from VNS implantation to birth was 44.3 months. Slight seizure worsening during the last trimester was reported in one woman. In one patient, acute caesarean section was required due to placental separation. Planned birth induction and caesarean section were used in the other two women because of their seizure disorder. No malfunction of the stimulation system was detected during pregnancy or after birth. No congenital malformations were observed. The two children who were of school age at the time of this study require special schooling. CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed a high rate of obstetric interventions in patients with VNS. Although no teratogenic effect of VNS has been proven, the higher incidence of children exposed to VNS needing special education requires attention.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a císařský řez $7 D002585
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 12
- $a refrakterní epilepsie $x terapie $7 D000069279
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a placenta $7 D010920
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek těhotenství $7 D011256
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 12
- $a vagová stimulace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D055536
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dolezalova, Irena $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Novak, Zdenek $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pešlová, Eva $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brazdil, Milan $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00179151 $t Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $x 2193-6323 $g Roč. 83, č. 3 (2022), s. 259-264
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34496415 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134905 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822291 $s 1169855
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 83 $c 3 $d 259-264 $e 20210908 $i 2193-6323 $m Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $n J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg $x MED00179151
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720