• Something wrong with this record ?

Pregnancy Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Single-Center Experience

J. Chrastina, I. Dolezalova, Z. Novak, E. Pešlová, M. Brazdil

. 2022 ; 83 (3) : 259-264. [pub] 20210908

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been employed worldwide as an adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. However, the mechanisms of VNS action potentially increase the risk of obstetric complications. The study presents the long-term single-center experience with pregnancies and childbirth in women with VNS for refractory epilepsy based on prospectively collected epileptologic data and a retrospective analysis of pregnancy, childbirth, and data about long-term child development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a group of patients with VNS implanted for refractory epilepsy between October 1999 and January 2018, all the women of childbearing age (younger than 40 years) were identified. After checking their hospital records for data about any pregnancies, the women with confirmed childbirth during active VNS stimulation and their general practitioners were interviewed based on a prepared questionnaire regarding their gynecologic history, the course of pregnancy and childbirth, gestational week, birth weight and length, any congenital anomalies of the child, and the child's psychomotor development, school performance, and somatic health problems. RESULTS: From the group of 257 patients implanted with VNS for refractory epilepsy, 4 women (1.5%) became pregnant and gave birth (all on polypharmacotherapy). The mean interval from VNS implantation to birth was 44.3 months. Slight seizure worsening during the last trimester was reported in one woman. In one patient, acute caesarean section was required due to placental separation. Planned birth induction and caesarean section were used in the other two women because of their seizure disorder. No malfunction of the stimulation system was detected during pregnancy or after birth. No congenital malformations were observed. The two children who were of school age at the time of this study require special schooling. CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed a high rate of obstetric interventions in patients with VNS. Although no teratogenic effect of VNS has been proven, the higher incidence of children exposed to VNS needing special education requires attention.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018612
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134911.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0041-1730966 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34496415
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Chrastina, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Pregnancy Outcomes in Refractory Epilepsy Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Single-Center Experience / $c J. Chrastina, I. Dolezalova, Z. Novak, E. Pešlová, M. Brazdil
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been employed worldwide as an adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. However, the mechanisms of VNS action potentially increase the risk of obstetric complications. The study presents the long-term single-center experience with pregnancies and childbirth in women with VNS for refractory epilepsy based on prospectively collected epileptologic data and a retrospective analysis of pregnancy, childbirth, and data about long-term child development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a group of patients with VNS implanted for refractory epilepsy between October 1999 and January 2018, all the women of childbearing age (younger than 40 years) were identified. After checking their hospital records for data about any pregnancies, the women with confirmed childbirth during active VNS stimulation and their general practitioners were interviewed based on a prepared questionnaire regarding their gynecologic history, the course of pregnancy and childbirth, gestational week, birth weight and length, any congenital anomalies of the child, and the child's psychomotor development, school performance, and somatic health problems. RESULTS: From the group of 257 patients implanted with VNS for refractory epilepsy, 4 women (1.5%) became pregnant and gave birth (all on polypharmacotherapy). The mean interval from VNS implantation to birth was 44.3 months. Slight seizure worsening during the last trimester was reported in one woman. In one patient, acute caesarean section was required due to placental separation. Planned birth induction and caesarean section were used in the other two women because of their seizure disorder. No malfunction of the stimulation system was detected during pregnancy or after birth. No congenital malformations were observed. The two children who were of school age at the time of this study require special schooling. CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed a high rate of obstetric interventions in patients with VNS. Although no teratogenic effect of VNS has been proven, the higher incidence of children exposed to VNS needing special education requires attention.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a císařský řez $7 D002585
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    12
$a refrakterní epilepsie $x terapie $7 D000069279
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a placenta $7 D010920
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a výsledek těhotenství $7 D011256
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a vagová stimulace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D055536
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dolezalova, Irena $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Novak, Zdenek $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pešlová, Eva $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Brazdil, Milan $u Department of Neurology, Brno Epilepsy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00179151 $t Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $x 2193-6323 $g Roč. 83, č. 3 (2022), s. 259-264
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34496415 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134905 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822291 $s 1169855
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 83 $c 3 $d 259-264 $e 20210908 $i 2193-6323 $m Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $n J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg $x MED00179151
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...