Can triad forestry reconcile Europe's biodiversity and forestry strategies? A critical evaluation of forest zoning
Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CA18207
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
P4-0059
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
GACR 22-31322S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PubMed
39699610
PubMed Central
PMC11871248
DOI
10.1007/s13280-024-02116-2
PII: 10.1007/s13280-024-02116-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biodiversity conservation, Disturbance, Forest management, Forest reserve, Land sharing/sparing, Wood production,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- lesnictví * metody MeSH
- lesy * MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů * metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Balancing increasing demand for wood products while also maintaining forest biodiversity is a paramount challenge. Europe's Biodiversity and Forest Strategies for 2030 attempt to address this challenge. Together, they call for strict protection of 10% of land area, including all primary and old growth forests, increasing use of ecological forestry, and less reliance on monocultural plantations. Using data on country wide silvicultural practices and a new database on strict forest reserves across Europe, we assess how triad forest zoning could help meet these goals. Our analysis reveals that zoning in Europe is overwhelmingly focused on wood production, while there has been little concomitant protection of forests in strict reserves. Moreover, most strict forest reserves are < 50 ha in size, likely too small to capture the minimum dynamic area necessary to sustain many taxa. We outline research priorities to meet future demands for timber while minimizing the impact on native biodiversity.
Austrian Research Centre for Forests Seckendorff Gudent Weg 8 1131 Vienna Austria
Bioeconomy Research Institute Vytautas Magnus University Studentų 11 53361 Akademija Lithuania
Biotechnical Faculty University of Montenegro Mihaila Lalica 1 81000 Podgorica Montenegro
Centre for Macroecology Evolution and Climate University of Copenhagen 2100 Copenhagen Denmark
Dendrology Department University of Forestry Kliment Ohridski 10 Blvd 1757 Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome P le Aldo Moro 5 00185 Rome Italy
Department of Forest Ecology and Silviculture Forestry Faculty University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Mangement University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Faculty of Forestry University of Sarajevo Zagrebačka 20 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina
Forest Research Institute Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA 57006 Thessaloniki Greece
Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu J Liivi 2 50409 Tartu Estonia
Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava Riga Street 111 Salaspils 2169 Latvia
National Biodiversity Future Centre Piazza Marina 61 90133 Palermo Italy
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Sognsveien 68 0855 Oslo Norway
School of Forest Sciences University of Eastern Finland Yliopistokatu 7 80101 Joensuu Finland
TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany
Université Grenoble Alpes INRAE Lessem 2 rue de la Papeterie BP76 38402 Saint Martin d'Heres France
Wageningen Environmental Research P O Box 47 Wageningen The Netherlands
WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute 8903 Birmensdorf Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Angeleri, R., U.G. Kormann, N. Roth, A. Ettwein, G. Pasinelli, R. Arlettaz, and T. Lachat. 2024. The White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) as an umbrella species for threatened sraproxylic beetle communities in Central European beech forests. Ecological Indicators 167: 112632. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112632.
Aszalós, R., D. Thom, T. Aakala, P. Angelstam, G. Brūmelis, L. Gálhidy, G. Gratzer, T. Hlásny, et al. 2022. Natural disturbance regimes as a guide for sustainable forest management in Europe. Ecological Applications 32: e2596. 10.1002/eap.2596. PubMed
Betts, M.G., B.T. Phalan, C. Wolf, S.C. Baker, C. Messier, K.J. Puettmann, R. Green, S.H. Harris, et al. 2021. Producing wood at least cost to biodiversity: Integrating triad and sharing-sparing approaches to inform forest landscape management. Biological Reviews 96: 1301–1317. 10.1111/brv.12703. PubMed
Blattert, C., K. Eyvindson, M. Monkkonen, K.J. Raatikainen, M. Trivino, and R. Duflot. 2023. Enhancing multifunctionality in European boreal forests: The potential role of Triad landscape functional zoning. Journal of Environmental Management 348: 119250. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119250. PubMed
Brunet, J., O. Fritz, and G. Richnau. 2010. Biodiversity in European beech forests-a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecological Bulletins 53: 77–94.
Burrascano, S., F. Chianucci, G. Trentanovi, S. Kepfer-Rojas, T. Sitzia, F. Tinya, I. Doerfler, Y. Pailletj, et al. 2023. Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to? Biological Conservation 284: 110176. 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110176.
Campion, D., I. Pardo, M. Elosegui, and D. Villanua. 2020. GPS telemetry and home range of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos: Results of the first experience. Acta Ornithologica 55: 77–87. 10.3161/00016454AO2020.55.1.008.
Chapron, G., P. Kaczensky, J.D.C. Linnell, M. von Arx, D. Huber, H. Andren, J. Vicente Lopez-Bao, M. Adamec, et al. 2014. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346: 1517–1519. 10.1126/science.1257553. PubMed
Eckelt, A., J. Müller, U. Bense, H. Brustel, H. Bußler, Y. Chittaro, L. Cizek, A. Frei, et al. 2018. “Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: A set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants. Journal of Insect Conservation 22: 15–28. 10.1007/s10841-017-0028-6.
Edwards, M., K. Lisgo, S. Leroux, M. Krawchuk, S. Cumming, and F. Schmiegelow. 2022. Conservation planning integrating natural disturbances: Estimating minimum reserve sizes for an insect disturbance in the boreal forest of eastern Canada. PLoS ONE 17: e0268236. 10.1371/journal.pone.0268236. PubMed PMC
Forest Europe. 2020. State of Europe’s Forests 2020.
Franklin, J.F., and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2009. Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 349–350. 10.1073/pnas.0812016105. PubMed PMC
Gloor, R., M. Svitok, M. Mikoláš, J. Hofmeister, J. Halda, P. Janda, F.M. Sabatini, L. Zemanová, et al. 2024. Sustaining forest biodiversity: Exploring the effect of long-term natural disturbance dynamics on contemporary lichen communities in primary forest ecosystems. Forest Ecosystems 11: 100214. 10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100214.
Gossner, M.M., T. Lachat, J. Brunet, G. Isacsson, C. Bouget, H. Brustel, R. Brandl, W.W. Weisser, et al. 2013. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests: functional diversity of beetles. Conservation Biology 27: 605–614. 10.1111/cobi.12023. PubMed
Gregor, K., T. Knoke, A. Krause, C.P.O. Reyer, M. Lindeskog, P. Papastefanou, B. Smith, A.-S. Lanso, et al. 2022. Trade-offs for climate-smart forestry in Europe under uncertain future climate. Earths Future 10: e2022EF002796. 10.1029/2022EF002796.
Gregor, K., C.P.O. Reyer, T.A. Nagel, A. Mäkelä, A. Krause, T. Knoke, and A. Rammig. 2024. Reconciling the EU forest, biodiversity, and climate strategies. Global Change Biology 30: e17431. 10.1111/gcb.17431. PubMed
Hanski, I. 2011. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40: 248–255. 10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3. PubMed PMC
Harris, S.H., and M.G. Betts. 2023. Selecting among land sparing, sharing and Triad in a temperate rainforest depends on biodiversity and timber production targets. Journal of Applied Ecology 60: 737–750. 10.1111/1365-2664.14385.
Kaasik, A., R. Kont, and A. Lohmus. 2023. Modeling forest landscape futures: Full scale simulation of realistic socioeconomic scenarios in Estonia. PLoS ONE 18: e0294650. 10.1371/journal.pone.0294650. PubMed PMC
Keith, H., Z. Kun, S. Hugh, M. Svoboda, M. Mikolas, D. Adam, D. Bernatski, V. Blujdea, et al. 2024. Carbon carrying capacity in primary forests shows potential for mitigation achieving the European Green Deal 2030 target. Communications Earth & Environment 5: 256. 10.1038/s43247-024-01416-5.
Kozák, D., M. Svitok, M. Wiezik, M. Mikoláš, S. Thorn, A. Buechling, J. Hofmeister, R. Matula, et al. 2021. Historical disturbances determine current taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity of saproxylic beetle communities in temperate primary forests. Ecosystems 24: 37–55. 10.1007/s10021-020-00502-x.
Kulakowski, D., R. Seidl, J. Holeksa, T. Kuuluvainen, T.A. Nagel, M. Panayotov, M. Svoboda, S. Thorn, et al. 2017. A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 388: 120–131. 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.037. PubMed PMC
Kuuluvainen, T., and T. Pukkala. 2024. Ecological silviculture for fennoscandian scots pine ecosystems. In Ecological silvicultural systems: Exemplary models for sustainable forest management, ed. B.J. Palik and A.W. D’Amato, 229–243. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Larsen, J. B., P. Angelstam, J. Bauhus, J. F. Carvalho, J. Diaci, D. Dobrowolska, A. Gazda, L. Gustafsson, et al. 2022. Closer-to-Nature Forest Management. From Science to Policy 12. Vol. 12. EFI European Forest Institute.
Mason, W.L., J. Diaci, J. Carvalho, and S. Valkonen. 2021. Continuous cover forestry in Europe: Usage and the knowledge gaps and challenges to wider adoption. Forestry: an International Journal of Forest Research 95: 1–12. 10.1093/forestry/cpab038.
Mikolas, M., M. Svitok, R. Bace, G.W. Meigs, W.S. Keeton, H. Keith, A. Buechling, V. Trotsiuk, et al. 2021. Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 288: 20211631. 10.1098/rspb.2021.1631. PubMed PMC
Mikolas, M., G. Piovesan, A. Ahlstrom, D.C. Donato, R. Gloor, J. Hofmeister, W.S. Keeton, B. Muys, et al. 2023. Protect old-growth forests in Europe now. Science 380: 466. 10.1126/science.adh2303. PubMed
Nagel, T.A., M. Svoboda, and M. Kobal. 2014. Disturbance, life history traits, and dynamics in an old-growth forest landscape of southeastern Europe. Ecological Applications 24: 663–679. PubMed
Nagel, T.A., D. Firm, R. Pisek, T. Mihelic, D. Hladnik, M. de Groot, and D. Rozenbergar. 2017a. Evaluating the influence of integrative forest management on old-growth habitat structures in a temperate forest region. Biological Conservation 216: 101–107. 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.008.
Nagel, T.A., S. Mikac, M. Dolinar, M. Klopcic, S. Keren, M. Svoboda, J. Diaci, A. Boncina, et al. 2017b. The natural disturbance regime in forests of the Dinaric mountains: A synthesis of evidence. Forest Ecology and Management 388: 29–42. 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.047.
Nagel, T.A., M. Svoboda, L. Vitkova, and D. Rozenbergar. 2024. Ecological silviculture for european beech-dominated forest ecosystems. In Ecological silvicultural systems: exemplary models for sustainable forest management, ed. B.J. Palik and A.W. D’Amato, 257–270. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Naumov, V., M. Manton, M. Elbakidze, Z. Rendenieks, J. Priednieks, S. Uhlianets, T. Yamelynets, A. Zhivotov, et al. 2018. How to reconcile wood production and biodiversity conservation? The Pan-European boreal forest history gradient as an “experiment.” Journal of Environmental Management 218: 1–13. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.095. PubMed
Paquette, A., and C. Messier. 2010. The role of plantations in managing the world’s forests in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 27–34. 10.1890/080116.
Parviainen, J., W. Bücking, K. Vandekerkhove, A. Schuck, and R. Päivinen. 2000. Strict forest reserves in Europe: Efforts to enhance biodiversity and research on forests left for free development in Europe (EU-COST-Action E4). Forestry 73: 107–118. 10.1093/forestry/73.2.107.
Pawson, S.M., A. Brin, E.G. Brockerhoff, D. Lamb, T.W. Payn, A. Paquette, and J.A. Parrotta. 2013. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 1203–1227. 10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8.
Peng, L., T.D.D. Searchinger, J. Zionts, and R. Waite. 2023. The carbon costs of global wood harvests. Nature 620: 110. 10.1038/s41586-023-06187-1. PubMed PMC
Pickett, S., and J. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13: 27–37. 10.1016/0006-3207(78)90016-2.
Ranius, T., and J.-M. Roberge. 2011. Effects of intensified forestry on the landscape-scale extinction risk of dead wood dependent species. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 2867–2882. 10.1007/s10531-011-0143-8.
Roberge, J.-M., G. Mikusinski, and S. Svensson. 2008. The white-backed woodpecker: Umbrella species for forest conservation planning? Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2479–2494. 10.1007/s10531-008-9394-4.
Schall, P., M.M. Gossner, S. Heinrichs, M. Fischer, S. Boch, D. Prati, K. Jung, V. Baumgartner, et al. 2018. The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 267–278. 10.1111/1365-2664.12950.
Seymour, R. S., and M. L. Hunter. 1992. New Forestry in Eastern Spruce-Fir Forests: Principles and Applications to Maine. 716. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication.
Thorn, S., S. Seibold, A.B. Leverkus, T. Michler, J. Mueller, R.F. Noss, N. Stork, S. Vogel, et al. 2020. The living dead: acknowledging life after tree death to stop forest degradation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18: 505–512. 10.1002/fee.2252.
Trivino, M., T. Pohjanmies, A. Mazziotta, A. Juutinen, D. Podkopaev, E. Le Tortorec, and M. Monkkonen. 2017. Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 61–70. 10.1111/1365-2664.12790.
Wesołowski, T. 2005. Virtual conservation: how the European Union is turning a blind eye to its vanishing primeval forests. Conservation Biology 19: 1349–1358. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00265.x.