-
Something wrong with this record ?
Cure or Carcinogen? A Framing Analysis of European Radon Spa Websites
R. Geysmans, T. Perko, M. Keser, C. Pölzl-Viol, I. Fojtíková, P. Mihók
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1956
PubMed Central
from 2021
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-02-01
- MeSH
- Carcinogens MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Radon * adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Objectives: Radon, a radioactive gas, is among the leading causes of lung-cancer worldwide. While public health authorities emphasize radon's health risks, there are spas across Europe which claim health benefits of radon. This study investigates how websites of European radon spas frame radon gas, in order to understand the potential controversy between "radon as carcinogen" and "radon as cure," and its potential impact on public health interventions. Methods: A two-phased frame analysis of websites of radon spas (n = 26) situated in the European Union. Results: Five frames are identified, which present radon as a 1) source of health, 2) natural gas, 3) (non) risk, 4) luxury and 5) fountain of youth. These five partly overlapping frames are at times in clear contrast with the ways in which radon is presented in a public health context. Conclusion: Being aware of the existence and contents of radon frames, which potentially challenge or contradict public health interventions, helps responsible authorities in designing more effective campaigns and interventions.
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety Vienna Austria
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre Mol Belgium
Federal Office for Radiation Protection Oberschleissheim Neuherberg Germany
National Radiation Protection Institute Prague Czechia
Research and Innovation Centre Faculty of Economics Matej Bel University Banská Bystrica Slovakia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018731
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135044.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604559 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35529478
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Geysmans, Robbe $u Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
- 245 10
- $a Cure or Carcinogen? A Framing Analysis of European Radon Spa Websites / $c R. Geysmans, T. Perko, M. Keser, C. Pölzl-Viol, I. Fojtíková, P. Mihók
- 520 9_
- $a Objectives: Radon, a radioactive gas, is among the leading causes of lung-cancer worldwide. While public health authorities emphasize radon's health risks, there are spas across Europe which claim health benefits of radon. This study investigates how websites of European radon spas frame radon gas, in order to understand the potential controversy between "radon as carcinogen" and "radon as cure," and its potential impact on public health interventions. Methods: A two-phased frame analysis of websites of radon spas (n = 26) situated in the European Union. Results: Five frames are identified, which present radon as a 1) source of health, 2) natural gas, 3) (non) risk, 4) luxury and 5) fountain of youth. These five partly overlapping frames are at times in clear contrast with the ways in which radon is presented in a public health context. Conclusion: Being aware of the existence and contents of radon frames, which potentially challenge or contradict public health interventions, helps responsible authorities in designing more effective campaigns and interventions.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a karcinogeny $7 D002273
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a radon $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011886
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Perko, Tanja $u Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Keser, Mirjana $u Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Pölzl-Viol, Christiane $u Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Oberschleissheim-Neuherberg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Fojtíková, Ivana $u National Radiation Protection Institute, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Mihók, Peter $u Research and Innovation Centre, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188766 $t International journal of public health $x 1661-8564 $g Roč. 67, č. - (2022), s. 1604559
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35529478 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135038 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822376 $s 1169974
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 67 $c - $d 1604559 $e 20220422 $i 1661-8564 $m International journal of public health $n Int J Public Health $x MED00188766
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720