-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach
A. Vlasák, V. Gerla, P. Skalický, A. Mládek, V. Sedlák, J. Vrána, H. Whitley, L. Lhotská, V. Beneš, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1996
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2015-06-01
- MeSH
- aquaeductus cerebri MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody MeSH
- normotenzní hydrocefalus * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- strojové učení MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% ± 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% ± 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% ± 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 ± 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% ± 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 ± 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019040
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135316.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3171/2022.1.FOCUS21733 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35364583
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vlasák, Aleš $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
- 245 10
- $a Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach / $c A. Vlasák, V. Gerla, P. Skalický, A. Mládek, V. Sedlák, J. Vrána, H. Whitley, L. Lhotská, V. Beneš, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% ± 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% ± 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% ± 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 ± 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% ± 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 ± 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.
- 650 _2
- $a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
- 650 _2
- $a aquaeductus cerebri $7 D002535
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006850
- 650 _2
- $a strojové učení $7 D000069550
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Gerla, Václav $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Skalický, Petr $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Mládek, Arnošt $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Sedlák, Vojtěch $u 4Department of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague; and
- 700 1_
- $a Vrána, Jiří $u 4Department of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague; and
- 700 1_
- $a Whitley, Helen $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Lhotská, Lenka $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague $u 5Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Beneš, Vladimír $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Beneš, Vladimír $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague
- 700 1_
- $a Bradáč, Ondřej $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008278 $t Neurosurgical focus $x 1092-0684 $g Roč. 52, č. 4 (2022), s. E6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35364583 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135310 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822587 $s 1170283
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 52 $c 4 $d E6 $e - $i 1092-0684 $m Neurosurgical focus $n Neurosurg Focus $x MED00008278
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720