• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach

A. Vlasák, V. Gerla, P. Skalický, A. Mládek, V. Sedlák, J. Vrána, H. Whitley, L. Lhotská, V. Beneš, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč

. 2022 ; 52 (4) : E6. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019040

OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% ± 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% ± 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% ± 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 ± 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% ± 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 ± 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019040
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135316.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3171/2022.1.FOCUS21733 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35364583
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vlasák, Aleš $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
245    10
$a Boosting phase-contrast MRI performance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnostics by means of machine learning approach / $c A. Vlasák, V. Gerla, P. Skalický, A. Mládek, V. Sedlák, J. Vrána, H. Whitley, L. Lhotská, V. Beneš, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Phase-contrast MRI allows detailed measurements of various parameters of CSF motion. This examination is technically demanding and machine dependent. The literature on this topic is ambiguous. Machine learning (ML) approaches have already been successfully utilized in medical research, but none have yet been applied to enhance the results of CSF flowmetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ML algorithms in enhancing the utilization and results of MRI flowmetry in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) diagnostics. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 30 iNPH patients and 15 healthy controls examined on one MRI machine. All major phase-contrast parameters were inspected: peak positive, peak negative, and average velocities; peak amplitude; positive, negative, and average flow rates; and aqueductal area. The authors applied ML algorithms to 85 complex features calculated from a phase-contrast study. RESULTS: The most distinctive parameters with p < 0.005 were the peak negative velocity, peak amplitude, and negative flow. From the ML algorithms, the Adaptive Boosting classifier showed the highest specificity and best discrimination potential overall, with 80.4% ± 2.9% accuracy, 72.0% ± 5.6% sensitivity, 84.7% ± 3.8% specificity, and 0.812 ± 0.047 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The highest sensitivity was 85.7% ± 5.6%, reached by the Gaussian Naive Bayes model, and the best AUC was 0.854 ± 0.028 by the Extra Trees classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Feature extraction algorithms combined with ML approaches simplify the utilization of phase-contrast MRI. The highest-performing ML algorithm was Adaptive Boosting, which showed good calibration and discrimination on the testing data, with 80.4% accuracy, 72.0% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.812 AUC. Phase-contrast MRI boosted by the ML approach can help to determine shunt-responsive iNPH patients.
650    _2
$a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
650    _2
$a aquaeductus cerebri $7 D002535
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006850
650    _2
$a strojové učení $7 D000069550
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Gerla, Václav $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague
700    1_
$a Skalický, Petr $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Mládek, Arnošt $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague
700    1_
$a Sedlák, Vojtěch $u 4Department of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague; and
700    1_
$a Vrána, Jiří $u 4Department of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague; and
700    1_
$a Whitley, Helen $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Lhotská, Lenka $u 3Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, Prague $u 5Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Beneš, Vladimír $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Beneš, Vladimír $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Bradáč, Ondřej $u 1Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague $u 2Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague
773    0_
$w MED00008278 $t Neurosurgical focus $x 1092-0684 $g Roč. 52, č. 4 (2022), s. E6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35364583 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135310 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822587 $s 1170283
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 52 $c 4 $d E6 $e - $i 1092-0684 $m Neurosurgical focus $n Neurosurg Focus $x MED00008278
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...