Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study

A. Aminian, GA. Sgueglia, M. Wiemer, GL. Gasparini, J. Kefer, Z. Ruzsa, MAH. van Leeuwen, B. Vandeloo, C. Ungureanu, S. Kedev, JF. Iglesias, G. Leibundgut, K. Ratib, I. Bernat, I. Barriocanal, V. Borovicanin, S. Saito

. 2022 ; 244 (-) : 19-30. [pub] 20211016

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019395
E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago

Links

PubMed 34666014
DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.180
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has become the default access method for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. As compared to transfemoral access, TRA has been shown to be safer, cost-effective and more patient-friendly. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) represents the most frequent complication of TRA, and precludes future coronary procedures through the radial artery, the use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting or as arteriovenous fistula for patients on hemodialysis. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative to TRA, yielding potential for minimizing the risk of RAO. However, an international multicenter randomized comparison between DRA, and conventional TRA with respect to the rate of RAO is still lacking. TRIAL DESIGN: DISCO RADIAL is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. A total of 1300 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to undergo coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through DRA or TRA using the 6 Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath introducer. Extended experience with both TRA and DRA is required for operators' eligibility and optimal evidence-based best practice to reduce RAO systematically implemented by protocol. The primary endpoint is the incidence of forearm RAO assessed by vascular ultrasound at discharge. Several important secondary endpoints will also be assessed, including access-site cross-over, hemostasis time, and access-site related complications. SUMMARY: The DISCO RADIAL trial will provide the first large-scale multicenter randomized evidence comparing DRA to TRA in patients scheduled for coronary angiography or PCI with respect to the incidence of RAO at discharge.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019395
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135622.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.180 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34666014
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Aminian, Adel $u Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium. Electronic address: adaminian@hotmail.com
245    10
$a Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study / $c A. Aminian, GA. Sgueglia, M. Wiemer, GL. Gasparini, J. Kefer, Z. Ruzsa, MAH. van Leeuwen, B. Vandeloo, C. Ungureanu, S. Kedev, JF. Iglesias, G. Leibundgut, K. Ratib, I. Bernat, I. Barriocanal, V. Borovicanin, S. Saito
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has become the default access method for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. As compared to transfemoral access, TRA has been shown to be safer, cost-effective and more patient-friendly. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) represents the most frequent complication of TRA, and precludes future coronary procedures through the radial artery, the use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting or as arteriovenous fistula for patients on hemodialysis. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative to TRA, yielding potential for minimizing the risk of RAO. However, an international multicenter randomized comparison between DRA, and conventional TRA with respect to the rate of RAO is still lacking. TRIAL DESIGN: DISCO RADIAL is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. A total of 1300 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to undergo coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through DRA or TRA using the 6 Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath introducer. Extended experience with both TRA and DRA is required for operators' eligibility and optimal evidence-based best practice to reduce RAO systematically implemented by protocol. The primary endpoint is the incidence of forearm RAO assessed by vascular ultrasound at discharge. Several important secondary endpoints will also be assessed, including access-site cross-over, hemostasis time, and access-site related complications. SUMMARY: The DISCO RADIAL trial will provide the first large-scale multicenter randomized evidence comparing DRA to TRA in patients scheduled for coronary angiography or PCI with respect to the incidence of RAO at discharge.
650    12
$a arteriální okluzní nemoci $7 D001157
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x metody $7 D017023
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D062645
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a arteria radialis $7 D017534
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sgueglia, Gregory A $u Division of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Wiemer, Marcus $u Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Johannes Wesling University Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
700    1_
$a Gasparini, Gabriele Luigi $u Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Kefer, Joelle $u Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Ruzsa, Zoltan $u Department of Internal Medicine, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Medical Faculty, Szeged, Hungary; Cardiology Division, Bács-Kiskun County Hospital, Invasive Cardiology, Kecskemét, Hungary
700    1_
$a van Leeuwen, Maarten A H $u Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Vandeloo, Bert $u Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Ungureanu, Claudiu $u Department of Cardiology, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium
700    1_
$a Kedev, Sasko $u Interventional Cardiology Department, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, Macedonia
700    1_
$a Iglesias, Juan F $u Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Leibundgut, Gregor $u Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Ratib, Karim $u Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Bernat, Ivo $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Barriocanal, Irene $u European Medical and Clinical Division, Terumo Europe N.V., Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Borovicanin, Vladimir $u European Medical and Clinical Division, Terumo Europe N.V., Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Saito, Shigeru $u Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
773    0_
$w MED00000228 $t American heart journal $x 1097-6744 $g Roč. 244, č. - (2022), s. 19-30
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34666014 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135616 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822827 $s 1170638
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 244 $c - $d 19-30 $e 20211016 $i 1097-6744 $m The American heart journal $n Am Heart J $x MED00000228
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options