-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Overall survival and adverse events after treatment with darolutamide vs. apalutamide vs. enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
M. Wenzel, L. Nocera, C. Collà Ruvolo, C. Würnschimmel, Z. Tian, SF. Shariat, F. Saad, D. Tilki, M. Graefen, LA. Kluth, A. Briganti, P. Mandel, F. Montorsi, FKH. Chun, PI. Karakiewicz
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy, systematický přehled, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-09-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1997-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-09-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- benzamidy MeSH
- fenylthiohydantoin MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- nitrily MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
- pyrazoly MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- thiohydantoiny MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: The most recent overall survival (OS) and adverse event (AE) data have not been compared for the three guideline-recommended high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treatment alternatives. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis focusing on OS and AE according to the most recent apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide reports. We systematically examined and compared apalutamide vs. enzalutamide vs. darolutamide efficacy and toxicity, relative to ADT according to PRISMA. We relied on PubMed search for most recent reports addressing prospective randomized trials with proven predefined OS benefit, relative to ADT: SPARTAN, PROSPER, and ARAMIS. OS represented the primary outcome and AEs represented secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, data originated from 4117 observations made within the three trials that were analyzed. Regarding OS benefit relative to ADT, darolutamide ranked first, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. In the subgroup of PSA-doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤ 6 months patients, enzalutamide ranked first, followed by darolutamide and apalutamide in that order. Conversely, in the subgroup of PSA-DT 6-10 months patients, darolutamide ranked first, followed by apalutamide and enzalutamide, in that order. Regarding grade 3+ AEs, darolutamide was most favorable, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. CONCLUSION: The current network meta-analysis suggests the highest OS efficacy and lowest grade 3+ toxicity for darolutamide. However, in the PSA-DT ≤ 6 months subgroup, the highest efficacy was recorded for enzalutamide. It is noteworthy that study design, study population, and follow-up duration represent some of the potentially critical differences that distinguish between the three studies and remained statistically unaccounted for using the network meta-analysis methodology. Those differences should be strongly considered in the interpretation of the current and any network meta-analyses.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czechia
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019452
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135656.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41391-021-00395-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34054128
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Wenzel, Mike $u Department of Urology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Mike.Wenzel@kgu.de $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada. Mike.Wenzel@kgu.de $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243380889
- 245 10
- $a Overall survival and adverse events after treatment with darolutamide vs. apalutamide vs. enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis / $c M. Wenzel, L. Nocera, C. Collà Ruvolo, C. Würnschimmel, Z. Tian, SF. Shariat, F. Saad, D. Tilki, M. Graefen, LA. Kluth, A. Briganti, P. Mandel, F. Montorsi, FKH. Chun, PI. Karakiewicz
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The most recent overall survival (OS) and adverse event (AE) data have not been compared for the three guideline-recommended high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treatment alternatives. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis focusing on OS and AE according to the most recent apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide reports. We systematically examined and compared apalutamide vs. enzalutamide vs. darolutamide efficacy and toxicity, relative to ADT according to PRISMA. We relied on PubMed search for most recent reports addressing prospective randomized trials with proven predefined OS benefit, relative to ADT: SPARTAN, PROSPER, and ARAMIS. OS represented the primary outcome and AEs represented secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, data originated from 4117 observations made within the three trials that were analyzed. Regarding OS benefit relative to ADT, darolutamide ranked first, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. In the subgroup of PSA-doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤ 6 months patients, enzalutamide ranked first, followed by darolutamide and apalutamide in that order. Conversely, in the subgroup of PSA-DT 6-10 months patients, darolutamide ranked first, followed by apalutamide and enzalutamide, in that order. Regarding grade 3+ AEs, darolutamide was most favorable, followed by enzalutamide and apalutamide, in that order. CONCLUSION: The current network meta-analysis suggests the highest OS efficacy and lowest grade 3+ toxicity for darolutamide. However, in the PSA-DT ≤ 6 months subgroup, the highest efficacy was recorded for enzalutamide. It is noteworthy that study design, study population, and follow-up duration represent some of the potentially critical differences that distinguish between the three studies and remained statistically unaccounted for using the network meta-analysis methodology. Those differences should be strongly considered in the interpretation of the current and any network meta-analyses.
- 650 _2
- $a benzamidy $7 D001549
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a síťová metaanalýza $7 D000071076
- 650 _2
- $a nitrily $7 D009570
- 650 _2
- $a fenylthiohydantoin $7 D010669
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a prostatický specifický antigen $7 D017430
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D064129
- 650 _2
- $a pyrazoly $7 D011720
- 650 _2
- $a thiohydantoiny $7 D013867
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Nocera, Luigi $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000333548139
- 700 1_
- $a Collà Ruvolo, Claudia $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada $u Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181107341
- 700 1_
- $a Würnschimmel, Christoph $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada $u Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000178914791
- 700 1_
- $a Tian, Zhe $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czechia $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000314269273
- 700 1_
- $a Saad, Fred $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Tilki, Derya $u Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000170331380
- 700 1_
- $a Graefen, Markus $u Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kluth, Luis A $u Department of Urology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Briganti, Alberto $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Mandel, Philipp $u Department of Urology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Montorsi, Francesco $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Chun, Felix K H $u Department of Urology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008064 $t Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $x 1476-5608 $g Roč. 25, č. 2 (2022), s. 139-148
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34054128 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135649 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822875 $s 1170695
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 25 $c 2 $d 139-148 $e 20210530 $i 1476-5608 $m Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $n Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis $x MED00008064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720