-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Š. Solecka, K. Matler, T. Kostlivý, V. Kubec, H. Tomášková, J. Betka
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
00669806
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
PubMed
36143452
DOI
10.3390/life12091416
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22023330
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031095240.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221010s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/life12091416 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36143452
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Solecka, Šárka $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital in Frýdek-Místek, 73801 Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 0000000294622032
- 245 12
- $a A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea / $c Š. Solecka, K. Matler, T. Kostlivý, V. Kubec, H. Tomášková, J. Betka
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Matler, Karel $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital in Frýdek-Místek, 73801 Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kostlivý, Tomáš $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30000 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kubec, Vojtěch $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30000 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tomášková, Hana $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 0000000296081276
- 700 1_
- $a Betka, Jaroslav $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186366 $t Life (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-1729 $g Roč. 12, č. 9 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36143452 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221010 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031095238 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1853814 $s 1174618
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 12 $c 9 $e 20220910 $i 2075-1729 $m Life $n Life (Basel) $x MED00186366
- GRA __
- $a 00669806 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221010