Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Š. Solecka, K. Matler, T. Kostlivý, V. Kubec, H. Tomášková, J. Betka

. 2022 ; 12 (9) : . [pub] 20220910

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22023330

Grantová podpora
00669806 Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl

The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22023330
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031095240.0
007      
ta
008      
221010s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/life12091416 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36143452
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Solecka, Šárka $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital in Frýdek-Místek, 73801 Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 0000000294622032
245    12
$a A Comparison of the Reliability of Five Sleep Questionnaires for the Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea / $c Š. Solecka, K. Matler, T. Kostlivý, V. Kubec, H. Tomášková, J. Betka
520    9_
$a The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of five sleep questionnaires in detecting the occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study was conducted on a group of 201 patients. The patients completed five sleep questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, the patients were examined using limited polygraphy, and the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires were evaluated. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity for OSA detection (81.6%, 78.7%, and 74.2%, respectively), while the sensitivities of PSQI and ESS were low (50.8% and 34.5%). The ESS, STOP-Bang, STOP and Berlin questionnaires had the highest specificity (82.6%, 75%, 61.9%, and 61.9%). In our sample, we found the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires to be the most suitable for OSA screening with the highest sensitivities (81.6%, 78.7%) and satisfactory specificities (75%, 61.9%). The STOP questionnaire was also relatively reliable, especially given its time-saving nature; though short, it preserved satisfactory sensitivity (74.2%) and specificity (61.9%). The ESS and PSQI were unsuitable for OSA screening.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Matler, Karel $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital in Frýdek-Místek, 73801 Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kostlivý, Tomáš $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30000 Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kubec, Vojtěch $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30000 Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tomášková, Hana $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 0000000296081276
700    1_
$a Betka, Jaroslav $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00186366 $t Life (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-1729 $g Roč. 12, č. 9 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36143452 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20221010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031095238 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1853814 $s 1174618
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 12 $c 9 $e 20220910 $i 2075-1729 $m Life $n Life (Basel) $x MED00186366
GRA    __
$a 00669806 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organization, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221010

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...