-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
V. Antoniou, CH. Davos, E. Kapreli, L. Batalik, DB. Panagiotakos, G. Pepera
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
Grantová podpora
FNBr, 65269705
Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2012
PubMed Central
od 2012
Europe PubMed Central
od 2012
ProQuest Central
od 2019-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2019-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2012
PubMed
35807055
DOI
10.3390/jcm11133772
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a highly recommended intervention towards the advancement of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients' health profile; though with low participation rates. Although home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) with the use of wearable sensors is proposed as a feasible alternative rehabilitation model, further investigation is needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable sensors-assisted HBCR in improving the CVD patients' cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health profile. PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 2010 to January 2022, using relevant keywords. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials, written in English, comparing wearable sensors-assisted HBCR to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) or usual care (UC), were included. Wearable sensors-assisted HBCR significantly improved CRF when compared to CBCR (Hedges' g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06, 0.39; I2 = 0%; p = 0.01), whilst comparison of HBCR to UC revealed a nonsignificant effect (Hedges' g = 0.87, 95% CI -0.87, 1.85; I2 = 96.41%; p = 0.08). Effects on physical activity, quality of life, depression levels, modification of cardiovascular risk factors/laboratory parameters, and adherence were synthesized narratively. No significant differences were noted. Technology tools are growing fast in the cardiac rehabilitation era and promote exercise-based interventions into a more home-based setting. Wearable-assisted HBCR presents the potential to act as an adjunct or an alternative to CBCR.
Department of Public Health Masaryk University Brno Zerotinovo nam 617 9 601 77 Brno Czech Republic
Department of Rehabilitation University Hospital Brno Jihlavska 20 62500 Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Health University of Canberra Bruce 2617 Australia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22023814
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031095154.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221010s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jcm11133772 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35807055
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Antoniou, Varsamo $u Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35100 Lamia, Greece $1 0000000180299767
- 245 10
- $a Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c V. Antoniou, CH. Davos, E. Kapreli, L. Batalik, DB. Panagiotakos, G. Pepera
- 520 9_
- $a Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a highly recommended intervention towards the advancement of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients' health profile; though with low participation rates. Although home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) with the use of wearable sensors is proposed as a feasible alternative rehabilitation model, further investigation is needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable sensors-assisted HBCR in improving the CVD patients' cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health profile. PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 2010 to January 2022, using relevant keywords. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials, written in English, comparing wearable sensors-assisted HBCR to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) or usual care (UC), were included. Wearable sensors-assisted HBCR significantly improved CRF when compared to CBCR (Hedges' g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06, 0.39; I2 = 0%; p = 0.01), whilst comparison of HBCR to UC revealed a nonsignificant effect (Hedges' g = 0.87, 95% CI -0.87, 1.85; I2 = 96.41%; p = 0.08). Effects on physical activity, quality of life, depression levels, modification of cardiovascular risk factors/laboratory parameters, and adherence were synthesized narratively. No significant differences were noted. Technology tools are growing fast in the cardiac rehabilitation era and promote exercise-based interventions into a more home-based setting. Wearable-assisted HBCR presents the potential to act as an adjunct or an alternative to CBCR.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Davos, Constantinos H $u Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou Street, 115 27 Athens, Greece $1 0000000203217569
- 700 1_
- $a Kapreli, Eleni $u Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35100 Lamia, Greece
- 700 1_
- $a Batalik, Ladislav $u Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Public Health, Masaryk University Brno, Zerotinovo nam. 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic $1 0000000321471541
- 700 1_
- $a Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B $u Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, 176 71 Kallithea, Greece $u Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce 2617, Australia $1 000000018583153X
- 700 1_
- $a Pepera, Garyfallia $u Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35100 Lamia, Greece $1 0000000180120325
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 11, č. 13 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35807055 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221010 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031095152 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1854034 $s 1175102
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 11 $c 13 $e 20220629 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
- GRA __
- $a FNBr, 65269705 $p Ministry of Health Czech Republic
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221010