Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Anti-CD38 antibody therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: differential mechanisms of action and recent clinical trial outcomes

X. Leleu, T. Martin, K. Weisel, F. Schjesvold, S. Iida, F. Malavasi, S. Manier, . Chang-Ki Min, EM. Ocio, C. Pawlyn, A. Perrot, H. Quach, J. Richter, I. Spicka, K. Yong, PG. Richardson

. 2022 ; 101 (10) : 2123-2137. [pub] 20220809

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024226
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem

CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions both as a receptor and an ectoenzyme, playing key roles in the regulation of calcium signaling and migration of immune cells to tumor microenvironments. High expression on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and limited expression on normal cells makes CD38 an ideal target for the treatment of MM patients. Two monoclonal antibodies directed at CD38, isatuximab and daratumumab, are available for use in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM); daratumumab is also approved in newly diagnosed MM and light-chain amyloidosis. Clinical experience has shown that anti-CD38 antibody therapy is transforming treatment of MM owing to its anti-myeloma efficacy and manageable safety profile. Isatuximab and daratumumab possess similarities and differences in their mechanisms of action, likely imparted by their binding to distinct, non-overlapping epitopes on the CD38 molecule. In this review, we present the mechanistic properties of these two antibodies and outline available evidence on their abilities to induce adaptive immune responses and modulate the bone marrow niche in MM. Further, we discuss differences in regulatory labeling between these two agents and analyze recent key clinical trial results, including evidence in patients with underlying renal impairment and other poor prognostic factors. Finally, we describe the limited existing evidence for the use of isatuximab or daratumumab after disease progression on prior anti-CD38 mono- or combination therapy, highlighting the need for additional clinical evaluations to define optimal anti-CD38 antibody therapy selection and sequencing in RRMM.

Clinical Haematology Service St Vincent's Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia

Department of Haematology University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

Department of Hematology and Oncology Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan

Department of Hematology CHU Universite de Lille Lille France

Department of Hematology College of Medicine Catholic Hematology Hospital and Leukemia Research Institute Seoul St Mary's Hospital The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea

Department of Hematology Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Toulouse France

Department of Medical Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA

Department of Medical Sciences University of Torino Medical School Fondazione Ricerca Molinette Turin Italy

Department of Medicine Department of Hematology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Medicine University of California at San Francisco San Francisco CA USA

Division of Cancer Therapeutics The Institute of Cancer Research London UK

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology Tisch Cancer Institute Mount Sinai New York NY USA

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain

Oslo Myeloma Center Department of Hematology KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies Oslo University Hospital University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Service d'Hématologie Et Thérapie Cellulaire CHU and CIC Inserm 1402 Poitiers Cedex France

University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024226
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100332.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00277-022-04917-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35943588
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Leleu, Xavier $u Service d'Hématologie Et Thérapie Cellulaire, CHU and CIC Inserm 1402, Poitiers Cedex, France. Xavier.LELEU@chu-poitiers.fr
245    10
$a Anti-CD38 antibody therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: differential mechanisms of action and recent clinical trial outcomes / $c X. Leleu, T. Martin, K. Weisel, F. Schjesvold, S. Iida, F. Malavasi, S. Manier, . Chang-Ki Min, EM. Ocio, C. Pawlyn, A. Perrot, H. Quach, J. Richter, I. Spicka, K. Yong, PG. Richardson
520    9_
$a CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions both as a receptor and an ectoenzyme, playing key roles in the regulation of calcium signaling and migration of immune cells to tumor microenvironments. High expression on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and limited expression on normal cells makes CD38 an ideal target for the treatment of MM patients. Two monoclonal antibodies directed at CD38, isatuximab and daratumumab, are available for use in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM); daratumumab is also approved in newly diagnosed MM and light-chain amyloidosis. Clinical experience has shown that anti-CD38 antibody therapy is transforming treatment of MM owing to its anti-myeloma efficacy and manageable safety profile. Isatuximab and daratumumab possess similarities and differences in their mechanisms of action, likely imparted by their binding to distinct, non-overlapping epitopes on the CD38 molecule. In this review, we present the mechanistic properties of these two antibodies and outline available evidence on their abilities to induce adaptive immune responses and modulate the bone marrow niche in MM. Further, we discuss differences in regulatory labeling between these two agents and analyze recent key clinical trial results, including evidence in patients with underlying renal impairment and other poor prognostic factors. Finally, we describe the limited existing evidence for the use of isatuximab or daratumumab after disease progression on prior anti-CD38 mono- or combination therapy, highlighting the need for additional clinical evaluations to define optimal anti-CD38 antibody therapy selection and sequencing in RRMM.
650    _2
$a antigeny CD38 $7 D051997
650    12
$a protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074322
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a mnohočetný myelom $x terapie $7 D009101
650    _2
$a nádorové mikroprostředí $7 D059016
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Martin, Thomas $u Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Weisel, Katja $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Schjesvold, Fredrik $u Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
700    1_
$a Iida, Shinsuke $u Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
700    1_
$a Malavasi, Fabio $u Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino Medical School, Fondazione Ricerca Molinette, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Manier, Salomon $u Department of Hematology, CHU, Universite de Lille, Lille, France
700    1_
$a Chang-Ki Min, $u Department of Hematology, College of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital and Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
700    1_
$a Ocio, Enrique M $u Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
700    1_
$a Pawlyn, Charlotte $u Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
700    1_
$a Perrot, Aurore $u Department of Hematology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
700    1_
$a Quach, Hang $u Clinical Haematology Service, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
700    1_
$a Richter, Joshua $u Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
700    1_
$a Spicka, Ivan $u Department of Medicine, Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Yong, Kwee $u Department of Haematology, University College, Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
700    1_
$a Richardson, Paul G $u Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
773    0_
$w MED00000424 $t Annals of hematology $x 1432-0584 $g Roč. 101, č. 10 (2022), s. 2123-2137
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35943588 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100330 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854123 $s 1175516
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 101 $c 10 $d 2123-2137 $e 20220809 $i 1432-0584 $m Annals of hematology $n Ann Hematol $x MED00000424
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...