Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Elimination of LRVs Elicits Different Responses in Leishmania spp

A. Saura, A. Zakharova, D. Klocek, ES. Gerasimov, A. Butenko, DH. Macedo, E. Servienė, D. Zagirova, A. Meshcheryakova, IB. Rogozin, S. Serva, AY. Kostygov, V. Yurchenko

. 2022 ; 7 (4) : e0033522. [pub] 20220809

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Leishmaniaviruses (LRVs) have been demonstrated to enhance progression of leishmaniasis, a vector-transmitted disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations that is caused by flagellates of the genus Leishmania. Here, we used two previously proposed strategies of the LRV ablation to shed light on the relationships of two Leishmania spp. with their respective viral species (L. guyanensis, LRV1 and L. major, LRV2) and demonstrated considerable difference between two studied systems. LRV1 could be easily eliminated by the expression of exogenous capsids regardless of their origin (the same or distantly related LRV1 strains, or even LRV2), while LRV2 was only partially depleted in the case of the native capsid overexpression. The striking differences were also observed in the effects of complete viral elimination with 2'C-methyladenosine (2-CMA) on the transcriptional profiles of these two Leishmania spp. While virtually no differentially expressed genes were detected after the LRV1 removal from L. guyanensis, the response of L. major after ablation of LRV2 involved 87 genes, the analysis of which suggested a considerable stress experienced even after several passages following the treatment. This effect on L. major was also reflected in a significant decrease of the proliferation rate, not documented in L. guyanensis and naturally virus-free strain of L. major. Our findings suggest that integration of L. major with LRV2 is deeper compared with that of L. guyanensis with LRV1. We presume this determines different effects of the viral presence on the Leishmania spp. infections. IMPORTANCELeishmania spp. represent human pathogens that cause leishmaniasis, a widespread parasitic disease with mild to fatal clinical manifestations. Some strains of leishmaniae bear leishmaniaviruses (LRVs), and this has been shown to aggravate disease course. We investigated the relationships of two distally related Leishmania spp. with their respective LRVs using different strategies of virus removal. Our results suggest the South American L. guyanensis easily loses its virus with no important consequences for the parasite in the laboratory culture. Conversely, the Old-World L. major is refractory to virus removal and experiences a prominent stress if this removal is nonetheless completed. The drastically different levels of integration between the studied Leishmania spp. and their viruses suggest distinct effects of the viral presence on infections in these species of parasites.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024711
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250610115518.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1128/msphere.00335-22 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35943162
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Saura, Andreu $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Elimination of LRVs Elicits Different Responses in Leishmania spp / $c A. Saura, A. Zakharova, D. Klocek, ES. Gerasimov, A. Butenko, DH. Macedo, E. Servienė, D. Zagirova, A. Meshcheryakova, IB. Rogozin, S. Serva, AY. Kostygov, V. Yurchenko
520    9_
$a Leishmaniaviruses (LRVs) have been demonstrated to enhance progression of leishmaniasis, a vector-transmitted disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations that is caused by flagellates of the genus Leishmania. Here, we used two previously proposed strategies of the LRV ablation to shed light on the relationships of two Leishmania spp. with their respective viral species (L. guyanensis, LRV1 and L. major, LRV2) and demonstrated considerable difference between two studied systems. LRV1 could be easily eliminated by the expression of exogenous capsids regardless of their origin (the same or distantly related LRV1 strains, or even LRV2), while LRV2 was only partially depleted in the case of the native capsid overexpression. The striking differences were also observed in the effects of complete viral elimination with 2'C-methyladenosine (2-CMA) on the transcriptional profiles of these two Leishmania spp. While virtually no differentially expressed genes were detected after the LRV1 removal from L. guyanensis, the response of L. major after ablation of LRV2 involved 87 genes, the analysis of which suggested a considerable stress experienced even after several passages following the treatment. This effect on L. major was also reflected in a significant decrease of the proliferation rate, not documented in L. guyanensis and naturally virus-free strain of L. major. Our findings suggest that integration of L. major with LRV2 is deeper compared with that of L. guyanensis with LRV1. We presume this determines different effects of the viral presence on the Leishmania spp. infections. IMPORTANCELeishmania spp. represent human pathogens that cause leishmaniasis, a widespread parasitic disease with mild to fatal clinical manifestations. Some strains of leishmaniae bear leishmaniaviruses (LRVs), and this has been shown to aggravate disease course. We investigated the relationships of two distally related Leishmania spp. with their respective LRVs using different strategies of virus removal. Our results suggest the South American L. guyanensis easily loses its virus with no important consequences for the parasite in the laboratory culture. Conversely, the Old-World L. major is refractory to virus removal and experiences a prominent stress if this removal is nonetheless completed. The drastically different levels of integration between the studied Leishmania spp. and their viruses suggest distinct effects of the viral presence on infections in these species of parasites.
650    _2
$a virové plášťové proteiny $7 D036022
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a Leishmania $x genetika $7 D007891
650    12
$a leishmanióza $x parazitologie $7 D007896
650    12
$a Leishmaniavirus $x genetika $7 D019199
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural $7 D052060
700    1_
$a Zakharova, Alexandra $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klocek, Donnamae $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gerasimov, Evgeny S $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Butenko, Anzhelika $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice (Budweis), Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Macedo, Diego H $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Servienė, Elena $u Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
700    1_
$a Zagirova, Diana $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Meshcheryakova, Anastasia $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Rogozin, Igor B $u National Center for Biotechnology Informationgrid.419234.9, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
700    1_
$a Serva, Saulius $u Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Vilnius Universitygrid.6441.7, Vilnius, Lithuania $1 https://orcid.org/0000000226611614
700    1_
$a Kostygov, Alexei Yu $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000021516437X $7 xx0332796
700    1_
$a Yurchenko, Vyacheslav $u Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostravagrid.412684.d, Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000347653263
773    0_
$w MED00190572 $t mSphere $x 2379-5042 $g Roč. 7, č. 4 (2022), s. e0033522
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35943162 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250610115511 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854446 $s 1176001
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 7 $c 4 $d e0033522 $e 20220809 $i 2379-5042 $m mSphere $n mSphere $x MED00190572
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...