Research into face processing consistently shows an outgroup disadvantage in areas such as recognition memory and emotional identification. Potential ingroup advantage with respect to inferences regarding personality and behavioural outcomes, on the other hand, has not yet been studied. In the present study, we used the faces of male professional mixed martial arts (MMA) fighters of apparent African, European, or mixed-race origin as targets and males from four distant populations that vary in ethnic composition as perceivers. We compared the perceivers' inferences about targets' aggressiveness with the fighters' actual performance in professional MMA championships. Surprisingly, across three distant populations used in the study (Cameroon, Czech Republic, and Turkey), perceivers' inferences based on face rating were more congruent with real-world performance for targets belonging to an apparent racial outgroup (as opposed to ingroup). In an ethnically mixed population (Brazil), perceivers showed the lowest congruence for apparently mixed-race targets. It thus seems that the outgroup disadvantage observed in other face processing domains does not carry over to inferences about aggressive behavioural outcomes. In fact, it seems that this relationship is, if anything, reversed.

Faculty of Arts and Sciences Boğaziçi University Istanbul Turkey

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Social and Management Sciences University of Buea Buea Cameroon

Institute of Psychology University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Todorov AT, Olivola CY, Dotsch R, Mende-Siedlecki P. Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2015;66:519–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. PubMed DOI

Borkenau P, Brecke S, Möttig C, Paelecke M. Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. J. Res. Pers. 2009;43:703–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.007. DOI

Třebický V, Havlíček J, Roberts SC, Little AC, Kleisner K. Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychol. Sci. 2013;24:1664–72. doi: 10.1177/0956797613477117. PubMed DOI

Meissner CA, Brigham JC. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Public Policy, Law. 2001;7:3–35. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3. DOI

Furl N, Phillips PJ, O’Toole AJ. Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cogn. Sci. 2002;26:797–815. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2606_4. DOI

Sangrigoli S, Pallier C, Argenti A-M, Ventureyra VAG, De Schonen S. Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science. 2005;16:440–444. PubMed

Brambilla M, Riva P, Rule NO. Familiarity increases the accuracy of categorizing male sexual orientation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2013;55:193–195. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.023. DOI

Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1971;1:149–178. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202. DOI

Hugenberg K, Corneille O. Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces. Cogn. Sci. 2009;33:1173–1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01048.x. PubMed DOI

Michel C, Rossion B, Han J, Chung CS, Caldara R. Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science. 2006;17:608–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x. PubMed DOI

Young SG, Hugenberg K, Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF. Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2012;16:116–142. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418987. PubMed DOI

Levin DT. Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1996;22:1364–1382. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364. DOI

Lipp OV, et al. Searching for differences in race: Is there evidence for preferential detection of other-race faces? Emotion. 2009;9:350–360. doi: 10.1037/a0015530. PubMed DOI

Van Bavel JJ, Cunningham WA. A social identity approach to person memory: Group membership, collective identification, and social role shape attention and memory. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2012;38:1566–78. doi: 10.1177/0146167212455829. PubMed DOI

Kawakami K, et al. An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2014;107:1–20. doi: 10.1037/a0036838. PubMed DOI

Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2002;128:203–235. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203. PubMed DOI

Young SG, Hugenberg K. Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010;99:964–977. doi: 10.1037/a0020400. PubMed DOI

Young SG. An outgroup advantage in discriminating between genuine and posed smiles. Self Identity. 2017;16:298–312. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1270851. DOI

Hwang HC, Matsumoto D. Sender Ethnicity Differences in Lie Detection Accuracy and Confidence. GSTF J. Law Soc. Sci. 2014;3(1):15–19.

Valentová J, Rieger G, Havlíček J, Linsenmeier JAW, Bailey JM. Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: a cross-cultural comparison. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2011;40:1145–52. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9818-1. PubMed DOI

Rule NO. The influence of target and perceiver race in the categorisation of male sexual orientation. Perception. 2011;40:830–839. doi: 10.1068/p7001. PubMed DOI

Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM, Lee HK. They don’t all look alike: individuated impressions of other racial groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993;65:85–101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.85. PubMed DOI

Zebrowitz LA, et al. First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest. J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 2012;43:119–134. doi: 10.1177/0022022111411386. DOI

Rule NO, et al. Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010;98:1–15. doi: 10.1037/a0017673. PubMed DOI

Na J, Kim S, Oh H, Choi I, O’Toole A. Competence judgments based on facial appearance are better predictors of American elections than of Korean elections. Psychol. Sci. 2015;26:1107–1113. doi: 10.1177/0956797615576489. PubMed DOI

Short LA, et al. Detection of propensity for aggression based on facial structure irrespective of face race. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2012;33:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.07.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Rule NO, Ishii K, Ambady N. Cross-cultural impressions of leaders’ faces: Consensus and predictive validity. Int. J. Intercult. Relations. 2011;35:833–841. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.06.001. DOI

Brewer, M. In Advances in Social Cognition (eds Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S.) vol. 1, 1–36, 10.1521/soco.1993.11.1.150 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988).

Chance JE, Goldstein AG. Depth of processing in response to own- and other-race faces. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1981;7:475–480. doi: 10.1177/014616728173017. DOI

Trawalter S, Todd AR, Baird AA, Richeson JA. Attending to threat: Race-based patterns of selective attention. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2008;44:1322–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.006. PubMed DOI PMC

Ackerman JM, et al. They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychol. Sci. 2006;17:836–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x. PubMed DOI

Becker DV, et al. More memory bang for the attentional buck: Self-protection goals enhance encoding efficiency for potentially threatening males. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2010;1:182–189. doi: 10.1177/1948550609359202. PubMed DOI PMC

Maner JK, Miller S. Adaptive attentional attunement: Perceptions of danger and attention to outgroup men. Soc. Cogn. 2013;31:733–744. doi: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.733. DOI

Wilson TD, Schooler JW. Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1991;60:181–192. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181. PubMed DOI

Hancock KJ, Rhodes G. Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 2008;99:45–56. doi: 10.1348/000712607X199981. PubMed DOI

Stevenson MT, Soto JA, Adams RB. More than meets the eye: The role of self-identity in decoding complex emotional states. Emotion. 2012;12:882–886. doi: 10.1037/a0028628. PubMed DOI

Skorska, M. N., Geniole, S. N., Vrysen, B. M., McCormick, C. M. & Bogaert, A. F. Facial structure predicts sexual orientation in both men and women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 44, 1377–1394 (2015). PubMed

Valentová J, Kleisner K, Havlíček J, Neustupa J. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2014;43:353–61. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0194-x. PubMed DOI

Stirrat MR, Perrett DI. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychol. Sci. 2010;21:349–54. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362647. PubMed DOI

Environmental convergence in facial preferences: a cross-group comparison of Asian Vietnamese, Czech Vietnamese, and Czechs

Predictors of Fighting Ability Inferences Based on Faces