Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES EYE LENS DOSEMETERS USED IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY

J. Martinčík, T. Čechák, T. Urban, J. Tamášová, L. Siková, I. Jakubcová, Z. Balogová

. 2022 ; 198 (9-11) : 580-585. [pub] 2022Aug22

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024767

Grant support
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000778 European Regional Development Fund-Project

The aim of this contribution is to provide an overview of comparison of two types of eye lens dosemeter systems. The comparison was performed at the Department of Intravenous Cardiology using patient and physician phantoms and supplemented by dose simulation using the Monte Carlo method. The tests were performed in several specific geometries and in addition to eye lens dosemeters the value of a personal dosemeter located at the reference point was also monitored. The value of Hp(3) and Hp(10) was monitored. It is clear from the results that film dosemeters achieve more correct results in most cases. It is probably due to a better correction for the angle of exposure. This assumption must be verified by more detailed measurements in laboratory conditions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024767
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100047.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/rpd/ncac101 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36005993
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Martinčík, Jiří $u Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES EYE LENS DOSEMETERS USED IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY / $c J. Martinčík, T. Čechák, T. Urban, J. Tamášová, L. Siková, I. Jakubcová, Z. Balogová
520    9_
$a The aim of this contribution is to provide an overview of comparison of two types of eye lens dosemeter systems. The comparison was performed at the Department of Intravenous Cardiology using patient and physician phantoms and supplemented by dose simulation using the Monte Carlo method. The tests were performed in several specific geometries and in addition to eye lens dosemeters the value of a personal dosemeter located at the reference point was also monitored. The value of Hp(3) and Hp(10) was monitored. It is clear from the results that film dosemeters achieve more correct results in most cases. It is probably due to a better correction for the angle of exposure. This assumption must be verified by more detailed measurements in laboratory conditions.
650    12
$a kardiologie $x metody $7 D002309
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a oční čočka $7 D007908
650    12
$a pracovní expozice $x analýza $7 D016273
650    _2
$a dávka záření $7 D011829
650    12
$a radiační ochrana $x metody $7 D011835
650    _2
$a intervenční radiologie $x metody $7 D015642
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Čechák, Tomáš $u Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Urban, Tomáš $u Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tamášová, Jana $u Department of Radiation Protection, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Roentgenova 37/2, 150 30, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Siková, Lenka $u Department of Radiation Protection, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Roentgenova 37/2, 150 30, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jakubcová, Iva $u Department of Radiation Protection, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Roentgenova 37/2, 150 30, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Balogová, Zdenka $u Department of Radiation Protection, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Roentgenova 37/2, 150 30, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 198, č. 9-11 (2022), s. 580-585
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36005993 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100045 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854482 $s 1176057
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 198 $c 9-11 $d 580-585 $e 2022Aug22 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000778 $p European Regional Development Fund-Project
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options