• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A comparative study of single-channel signal processing methods in fetal phonocardiography

K. Barnova, R. Kahankova, R. Jaros, M. Litschmannova, R. Martinek

. 2022 ; 17 (8) : e0269884. [pub] 20220819

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024800

Fetal phonocardiography is a non-invasive, completely passive and low-cost method based on sensing acoustic signals from the maternal abdomen. However, different types of interference are sensed along with the desired fetal phonocardiography. This study focuses on the comparison of fetal phonocardiography filtering using eight algorithms: Savitzky-Golay filter, finite impulse response filter, adaptive wavelet transform, maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform, variational mode decomposition, empirical mode decomposition, ensemble empirical mode decomposition, and complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. The effectiveness of those methods was tested on four types of interference (maternal sounds, movement artifacts, Gaussian noise, and ambient noise) and eleven combinations of these disturbances. The dataset was created using two synthetic records r01 and r02, where the record r02 was loaded with higher levels of interference than the record r01. The evaluation was performed using the objective parameters such as accuracy of the detection of S1 and S2 sounds, signal-to-noise ratio improvement, and mean error of heart interval measurement. According to all parameters, the best results were achieved using the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise method with average values of accuracy = 91.53% in the detection of S1 and accuracy = 68.89% in the detection of S2. The average value of signal-to-noise ratio improvement achieved by complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise method was 9.75 dB and the average value of the mean error of heart interval measurement was 3.27 ms.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024800
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031101332.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0269884 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35984866
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Barnova, Katerina $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000155948294
245    12
$a A comparative study of single-channel signal processing methods in fetal phonocardiography / $c K. Barnova, R. Kahankova, R. Jaros, M. Litschmannova, R. Martinek
520    9_
$a Fetal phonocardiography is a non-invasive, completely passive and low-cost method based on sensing acoustic signals from the maternal abdomen. However, different types of interference are sensed along with the desired fetal phonocardiography. This study focuses on the comparison of fetal phonocardiography filtering using eight algorithms: Savitzky-Golay filter, finite impulse response filter, adaptive wavelet transform, maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform, variational mode decomposition, empirical mode decomposition, ensemble empirical mode decomposition, and complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. The effectiveness of those methods was tested on four types of interference (maternal sounds, movement artifacts, Gaussian noise, and ambient noise) and eleven combinations of these disturbances. The dataset was created using two synthetic records r01 and r02, where the record r02 was loaded with higher levels of interference than the record r01. The evaluation was performed using the objective parameters such as accuracy of the detection of S1 and S2 sounds, signal-to-noise ratio improvement, and mean error of heart interval measurement. According to all parameters, the best results were achieved using the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise method with average values of accuracy = 91.53% in the detection of S1 and accuracy = 68.89% in the detection of S2. The average value of signal-to-noise ratio improvement achieved by complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise method was 9.75 dB and the average value of the mean error of heart interval measurement was 3.27 ms.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a fonokardiografie $x metody $7 D010701
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
650    _2
$a poměr signál - šum $7 D059629
650    12
$a vlnková analýza $7 D058067
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kahankova, Radana $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Jaros, Rene $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000333466467
700    1_
$a Litschmannova, Martina $u Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000189286620
700    1_
$a Martinek, Radek $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/000000032054143X
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 17, č. 8 (2022), s. e0269884
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35984866 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031101330 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854499 $s 1176090
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 17 $c 8 $d e0269884 $e 20220819 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...