-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Effect of Osteoblast Isolation Methods from Adult Rats on Osteoclastogenesis in Co-Cultures
R. Žižková, V. Hedvičáková, VH. Blahnová, V. Sovková, M. Rampichová, E. Filová
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
18-09306S
Czech Science Foundation
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2000
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2000
PubMed Central
from 2007
Europe PubMed Central
from 2007
ProQuest Central
from 2000-03-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2000-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2007-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2000-03-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2000
PubMed
35887222
DOI
10.3390/ijms23147875
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cell Differentiation MeSH
- Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor * metabolism MeSH
- Coculture Techniques MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Leukocytes, Mononuclear metabolism MeSH
- RANK Ligand metabolism MeSH
- Osteoblasts metabolism MeSH
- Osteogenesis * MeSH
- Osteoclasts metabolism MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Co-cultures of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are on the rise because they enable a more complex study. Diseases such as osteoporosis are related to a higher age. Thus, cell isolation from adult individuals is necessary. Osteoblasts can be isolated from the rat femur by three methods: explant culture, explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment, or enzymatic treatment. The isolation methods yield different populations of osteoblasts which, in a co-culture with peripheral blood mononuclear cells, might result in differences in osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, we examined the differences in osteogenic markers, cell proliferation, and the metabolic activity of isolated osteoblast-like cells in a growth and differentiation medium. We then evaluated the effect of the isolated populations of osteoblast-like cells on osteoclastogenesis in a subsequent co-culture by evaluating osteoclast markers, counting formed osteoclast-like cells, and analyzing their area and number of nuclei. Co-cultures were performed in the presence or absence of osteoclastogenic growth factors, M-CSF and RANKL. It was discovered that enzymatic isolation is not feasible in adult rats, but explant culture and explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment were both successful. Explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment yielded cells with a higher proliferation than explant culture in a growth medium. The differentiation medium reduced differences in proliferation during the culture. Some differences in metabolic activity and ALP activity were also found between the osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture or by explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment, but only on some days of cultivation. According to microscopy, the presence of exogenous growth factors supporting osteoclastogenesis in co-cultures was necessary for the formation of osteoclast-like cells. In this case, the formation of a higher number of osteoclast-like cells with a larger area was observed in the co-culture with osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture compared to the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment. Apart from this observation, no differences in osteoclast markers were noted between the co-cultures with osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture and the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment. The TRAP and CA II activity was higher in the co-cultures with exogenous growth than that in the co-cultures without exogenous growth factors on day 7, but the opposite was true on day 14. To conclude, explant culture and explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment are both suitable methods to yield osteoblast-like cells from adult rats capable of promoting osteoclastogenesis in a direct co-culture with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment yielded cells with a higher proliferation. The explant culture yielded osteoblast-like cells which induced the formation of a higher number of osteoclast-like cells with a larger area compared to the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment when cultured with exogenous M-CSF and RANKL.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025202
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100523.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijms23147875 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35887222
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Žižková, Radmila $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000216791877
- 245 14
- $a The Effect of Osteoblast Isolation Methods from Adult Rats on Osteoclastogenesis in Co-Cultures / $c R. Žižková, V. Hedvičáková, VH. Blahnová, V. Sovková, M. Rampichová, E. Filová
- 520 9_
- $a Co-cultures of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are on the rise because they enable a more complex study. Diseases such as osteoporosis are related to a higher age. Thus, cell isolation from adult individuals is necessary. Osteoblasts can be isolated from the rat femur by three methods: explant culture, explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment, or enzymatic treatment. The isolation methods yield different populations of osteoblasts which, in a co-culture with peripheral blood mononuclear cells, might result in differences in osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, we examined the differences in osteogenic markers, cell proliferation, and the metabolic activity of isolated osteoblast-like cells in a growth and differentiation medium. We then evaluated the effect of the isolated populations of osteoblast-like cells on osteoclastogenesis in a subsequent co-culture by evaluating osteoclast markers, counting formed osteoclast-like cells, and analyzing their area and number of nuclei. Co-cultures were performed in the presence or absence of osteoclastogenic growth factors, M-CSF and RANKL. It was discovered that enzymatic isolation is not feasible in adult rats, but explant culture and explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment were both successful. Explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment yielded cells with a higher proliferation than explant culture in a growth medium. The differentiation medium reduced differences in proliferation during the culture. Some differences in metabolic activity and ALP activity were also found between the osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture or by explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment, but only on some days of cultivation. According to microscopy, the presence of exogenous growth factors supporting osteoclastogenesis in co-cultures was necessary for the formation of osteoclast-like cells. In this case, the formation of a higher number of osteoclast-like cells with a larger area was observed in the co-culture with osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture compared to the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment. Apart from this observation, no differences in osteoclast markers were noted between the co-cultures with osteoblast-like cells isolated by explant culture and the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment. The TRAP and CA II activity was higher in the co-cultures with exogenous growth than that in the co-cultures without exogenous growth factors on day 7, but the opposite was true on day 14. To conclude, explant culture and explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment are both suitable methods to yield osteoblast-like cells from adult rats capable of promoting osteoclastogenesis in a direct co-culture with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment yielded cells with a higher proliferation. The explant culture yielded osteoblast-like cells which induced the formation of a higher number of osteoclast-like cells with a larger area compared to the explant culture with enzymatic pre-treatment when cultured with exogenous M-CSF and RANKL.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a buněčná diferenciace $7 D002454
- 650 _2
- $a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
- 650 _2
- $a kokultivační techniky $7 D018920
- 650 _2
- $a leukocyty mononukleární $x metabolismus $7 D007963
- 650 12
- $a faktor stimulující kolonie makrofágů $x metabolismus $7 D016173
- 650 _2
- $a osteoblasty $x metabolismus $7 D010006
- 650 _2
- $a osteoklasty $x metabolismus $7 D010010
- 650 12
- $a osteogeneze $7 D010012
- 650 _2
- $a ligand RANK $x metabolismus $7 D053245
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hedvičáková, Věra $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Blahnová, Veronika Hefka $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sovková, Věra $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246189828
- 700 1_
- $a Rampichová, Michala $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196083370
- 700 1_
- $a Filová, Eva $u The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000031028605X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176142 $t International journal of molecular sciences $x 1422-0067 $g Roč. 23, č. 14 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35887222 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100521 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854749 $s 1176492
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 23 $c 14 $e 20220717 $i 1422-0067 $m International journal of molecular sciences $n Int J Mol Sci $x MED00176142
- GRA __
- $a 18-09306S $p Czech Science Foundation
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017