-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review
L. Lipková, M. Kumstát, I. Struhár
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2004
PubMed
35805242
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19137589
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fyzická vytrvalost * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- sportovci * MeSH
- únava MeSH
- zátěžový test metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025413
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100507.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph19137589 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35805242
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Lipková, Lucie $u Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review / $c L. Lipková, M. Kumstát, I. Struhár
- 520 9_
- $a Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a sportovci $7 D056352
- 650 _2
- $a zátěžový test $x metody $7 D005080
- 650 _2
- $a únava $7 D005221
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fyzická vytrvalost $7 D010807
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Kumstát, Michal $u Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Struhár, Ivan $u Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 19, č. 13 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35805242 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100505 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854901 $s 1176703
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 19 $c 13 $e 20220621 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017