Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Validation of Existing Clinical Prediction Tools for Primary Aldosteronism Subtyping

B. Kološová, P. Waldauf, D. Wichterle, J. Kvasnička, T. Zelinka, O. Petrák, Z. Krátká, L. Forejtová, J. Kaván, J. Widimský, R. Holaj

. 2022 ; 12 (11) : . [pub] 20221115

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22031279

The new clinical prediction score (SCORE) has been recently proposed for primary aldosteronism (PA) subtyping prior to adrenal vein sampling (AVS). This study aimed to compare that SCORE with previously published scores and their validation using a cohort of patients at our center who had had positive SIT confirming PA and had been diagnosed with either bilateral PA according to AVS or unilateral PA if biochemically cured after an adrenalectomy. Final diagnoses were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed clinical prediction tools. Only Kamemura's model (with a maximum score of 4 points) and Kobayashi's score (with a maximum score of 12 points) reached 100% reliability for prediction of bilateral PA; however, with sensitivity of only 3%. On the other hand, the values of SCORE = 3 (with sensitivity of 48%), the SPACE score ≥18 (with sensitivity of 35%), the Kobayashi's score ≤2 (with sensitivity of 28%), and the Kocjan's score = 3 (with sensitivity of 28%) were able to predict unilateral PA with 100% probability. Furthermore, Umakoshi's and Young's models both reached 100% reliability for a unilateral PA with score = 4 and both predictive factors together respectively; however, the sensitivity was lower compared with previous models; 4% and 14%, respectively. None of the clinical prediction tools applied to our cohort predicted unilateral and bilateral subtypes together with the expected high diagnostic performance, and therefore can only be used for precisely defined cases.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22031279
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231102102410.0
007      
ta
008      
230119s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/diagnostics12112806 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36428866
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kološová, Barbora $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0309398
245    10
$a Validation of Existing Clinical Prediction Tools for Primary Aldosteronism Subtyping / $c B. Kološová, P. Waldauf, D. Wichterle, J. Kvasnička, T. Zelinka, O. Petrák, Z. Krátká, L. Forejtová, J. Kaván, J. Widimský, R. Holaj
520    9_
$a The new clinical prediction score (SCORE) has been recently proposed for primary aldosteronism (PA) subtyping prior to adrenal vein sampling (AVS). This study aimed to compare that SCORE with previously published scores and their validation using a cohort of patients at our center who had had positive SIT confirming PA and had been diagnosed with either bilateral PA according to AVS or unilateral PA if biochemically cured after an adrenalectomy. Final diagnoses were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed clinical prediction tools. Only Kamemura's model (with a maximum score of 4 points) and Kobayashi's score (with a maximum score of 12 points) reached 100% reliability for prediction of bilateral PA; however, with sensitivity of only 3%. On the other hand, the values of SCORE = 3 (with sensitivity of 48%), the SPACE score ≥18 (with sensitivity of 35%), the Kobayashi's score ≤2 (with sensitivity of 28%), and the Kocjan's score = 3 (with sensitivity of 28%) were able to predict unilateral PA with 100% probability. Furthermore, Umakoshi's and Young's models both reached 100% reliability for a unilateral PA with score = 4 and both predictive factors together respectively; however, the sensitivity was lower compared with previous models; 4% and 14%, respectively. None of the clinical prediction tools applied to our cohort predicted unilateral and bilateral subtypes together with the expected high diagnostic performance, and therefore can only be used for precisely defined cases.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Šrobárova 1150/50, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000346685837
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kvasnička, Jan $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zelinka, Tomáš $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Petrák, Ondřej $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000189923562
700    1_
$a Krátká, Zuzana $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000151072926
700    1_
$a Forejtová, Lubomíra $u Department of Radiology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kaván, Jan $u Department of Radiology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Widimský, Jiří $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Holaj, Robert $u Centre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000294889706
773    0_
$w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 12, č. 11 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36428866 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230119 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231102102404 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1889434 $s 1182612
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 12 $c 11 $e 20221115 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics $x MED00195450
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230119

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...