-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Fusion of two unrelated protein domains in a chimera protein and its 3D prediction: Justification of the x-ray reference structures as a prediction benchmark
J. Vymětal, K. Mertová, K. Boušová, J. Šulc, K. Tripsianes, J. Vondrasek
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35833233
DOI
10.1002/prot.26398
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- proteinové domény MeSH
- proteiny * chemie MeSH
- rekombinantní fúzní proteiny * chemie MeSH
- rentgenové záření MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Proteins are naturally formed by domains edging their functional and structural properties. A domain out of the context of an entire protein can retain its structure and to some extent also function on its own. These properties rationalize construction of artificial fusion multidomain proteins with unique combination of various functions. Information on the specific functional and structural characteristics of individual domains in the context of new artificial fusion proteins is inevitably encoded in sequential order of composing domains defining their mutual spatial positions. So the challenges in designing new proteins with new domain combinations lie dominantly in structure/function prediction and its context dependency. Despite the enormous body of publications on artificial fusion proteins, the task of their structure/function prediction is complex and nontrivial. The degree of spatial freedom facilitated by a linker between domains and their mutual orientation driven by noncovalent interactions is beyond a simple and straightforward methodology to predict their structure with reasonable accuracy. In the presented manuscript, we tested methodology using available modeling tools and computational methods. We show that the process and methodology of such prediction are not straightforward and must be done with care even when recently introduced AlphaFold II is used. We also addressed a question of benchmarking standards for prediction of multidomain protein structures-x-ray or Nuclear Magnetic Resonance experiments. On the study of six two-domain protein chimeras as well as their composing domains and their x-ray structures selected from PDB, we conclude that the major obstacle for justified prediction is inappropriate sampling of the conformational space by the explored methods. On the other hands, we can still address particular steps of the methodology and improve the process of chimera proteins prediction.
Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Natural Sciences Charles University Praha 2 Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032494
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131150653.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/prot.26398 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35833233
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vymětal, Jiří $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Fusion of two unrelated protein domains in a chimera protein and its 3D prediction: Justification of the x-ray reference structures as a prediction benchmark / $c J. Vymětal, K. Mertová, K. Boušová, J. Šulc, K. Tripsianes, J. Vondrasek
- 520 9_
- $a Proteins are naturally formed by domains edging their functional and structural properties. A domain out of the context of an entire protein can retain its structure and to some extent also function on its own. These properties rationalize construction of artificial fusion multidomain proteins with unique combination of various functions. Information on the specific functional and structural characteristics of individual domains in the context of new artificial fusion proteins is inevitably encoded in sequential order of composing domains defining their mutual spatial positions. So the challenges in designing new proteins with new domain combinations lie dominantly in structure/function prediction and its context dependency. Despite the enormous body of publications on artificial fusion proteins, the task of their structure/function prediction is complex and nontrivial. The degree of spatial freedom facilitated by a linker between domains and their mutual orientation driven by noncovalent interactions is beyond a simple and straightforward methodology to predict their structure with reasonable accuracy. In the presented manuscript, we tested methodology using available modeling tools and computational methods. We show that the process and methodology of such prediction are not straightforward and must be done with care even when recently introduced AlphaFold II is used. We also addressed a question of benchmarking standards for prediction of multidomain protein structures-x-ray or Nuclear Magnetic Resonance experiments. On the study of six two-domain protein chimeras as well as their composing domains and their x-ray structures selected from PDB, we conclude that the major obstacle for justified prediction is inappropriate sampling of the conformational space by the explored methods. On the other hands, we can still address particular steps of the methodology and improve the process of chimera proteins prediction.
- 650 _2
- $a proteinové domény $7 D000072417
- 650 12
- $a proteiny $x chemie $7 D011506
- 650 _2
- $a rentgenové záření $7 D014965
- 650 12
- $a rekombinantní fúzní proteiny $x chemie $7 D011993
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mertová, Kateřina $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Natural Sciences, Charles University, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Boušová, Kristýna $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Šulc, Josef $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Natural Sciences, Charles University, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tripsianes, Konstantinos $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vondrasek, Jiri $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000026066973X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003938 $t Proteins $x 1097-0134 $g Roč. 90, č. 12 (2022), s. 2067-2079
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35833233 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131150649 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891322 $s 1183829
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 90 $c 12 $d 2067-2079 $e 20220727 $i 1097-0134 $m Proteins $n Proteins $x MED00003938
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120