-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of a Bioresorbable, Magnesium-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Permanent, Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent for Treating Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: the PRAGUE-22 Study
P. Toušek, T. Lazarák, I. Varvařovský, M. Nováčková, M. Neuberg, V. Kočka
Language English Country United States
Document type Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2022-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2022-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Acute Coronary Syndrome * diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Everolimus adverse effects MeSH
- Magnesium MeSH
- Coronary Angiography MeSH
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention * adverse effects methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Coronary Artery Disease * therapy MeSH
- Sirolimus MeSH
- Drug-Eluting Stents * MeSH
- Absorbable Implants MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: Magnesium-based bioresorbable Magmaris stents are rapidly resorbed. Few randomized studies have evaluated the efficacy of such stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome. AIM: To investigate late lumen loss as assessed via quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with Magmaris stents or permanent, everolimus-eluting metallic Xience stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: This PRAGUE-22 study was a two-centre, investigator-initiated, randomized study. Fifty patients were randomized based on the inclusion criteria for acute coronary syndrome and the anatomical suitability to receive Magmaris or Xience stents. The patient characteristics did not differ between the Magmaris group (n = 25) and Xience group (n = 25). The mean ages were 57.0 ± 10.5 vs. 55.5 ± 9.2 years (p = 0.541) and the total implanted stent length was 24.6 ± 10.7 mm vs. 27.6 ± 11.1 mm (p = 0.368), respectively. Four clinical events occurred in the Magmaris group and one in the Xience group during 12 months of follow-up. The extent of late lumen loss (assessed via QCA) at 12 months was greater in the Magmaris group than in the Xience group (0.54 ± 0.70 vs. 0.11 ± 0.37 mm; p = 0.029). The late lumen loss diameter (measured via OCT) in the Magmaris group was also significantly larger than that in the Xience group (0.59 ± 0.37 vs. 0.22 ± 0.20 mm; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Implantation of a magnesium-based bioresorbable stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome is associated with a greater extent of late lumen loss at the 12-month follow-up compared with implantation of a permanent, everolimus-eluting metallic stent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN89434356.
Department of Cardiology AGEL Pardubice Czech Republic
Medtronic Czechia Partner of INTERCARDIS Project Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032539
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131151312.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10557-021-07258-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34505954
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Toušek, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Third Medical Faculty Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. petr.tousek@fnkv.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000225983635
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of a Bioresorbable, Magnesium-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Permanent, Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent for Treating Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: the PRAGUE-22 Study / $c P. Toušek, T. Lazarák, I. Varvařovský, M. Nováčková, M. Neuberg, V. Kočka
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Magnesium-based bioresorbable Magmaris stents are rapidly resorbed. Few randomized studies have evaluated the efficacy of such stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome. AIM: To investigate late lumen loss as assessed via quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with Magmaris stents or permanent, everolimus-eluting metallic Xience stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: This PRAGUE-22 study was a two-centre, investigator-initiated, randomized study. Fifty patients were randomized based on the inclusion criteria for acute coronary syndrome and the anatomical suitability to receive Magmaris or Xience stents. The patient characteristics did not differ between the Magmaris group (n = 25) and Xience group (n = 25). The mean ages were 57.0 ± 10.5 vs. 55.5 ± 9.2 years (p = 0.541) and the total implanted stent length was 24.6 ± 10.7 mm vs. 27.6 ± 11.1 mm (p = 0.368), respectively. Four clinical events occurred in the Magmaris group and one in the Xience group during 12 months of follow-up. The extent of late lumen loss (assessed via QCA) at 12 months was greater in the Magmaris group than in the Xience group (0.54 ± 0.70 vs. 0.11 ± 0.37 mm; p = 0.029). The late lumen loss diameter (measured via OCT) in the Magmaris group was also significantly larger than that in the Xience group (0.59 ± 0.37 vs. 0.22 ± 0.20 mm; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Implantation of a magnesium-based bioresorbable stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome is associated with a greater extent of late lumen loss at the 12-month follow-up compared with implantation of a permanent, everolimus-eluting metallic stent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN89434356.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a everolimus $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000068338
- 650 _2
- $a sirolimus $7 D020123
- 650 12
- $a stenty uvolňující léky $7 D054855
- 650 _2
- $a hořčík $7 D008274
- 650 _2
- $a vstřebatelné implantáty $7 D020341
- 650 12
- $a akutní koronární syndrom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D054058
- 650 _2
- $a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 12
- $a koronární angioplastika $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D062645
- 650 12
- $a nemoci koronárních tepen $x terapie $7 D003324
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lazarák, Tomáš $u Department of Cardiology, AGEL, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Varvařovský, Ivo $u Department of Cardiology, AGEL, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nováčková, Markéta $u Department of Cardiology, Third Medical Faculty Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Neuberg, Marek $u Medtronic Czechia, Partner of INTERCARDIS Project, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kočka, Viktor $u Department of Cardiology, Third Medical Faculty Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001057 $t Cardiovascular drugs and therapy $x 1573-7241 $g Roč. 36, č. 6 (2022), s. 1129-1136
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34505954 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131151308 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891356 $s 1183874
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 36 $c 6 $d 1129-1136 $e 20210910 $i 1573-7241 $m Cardiovascular drugs and therapy $n Cardiovasc Drugs Ther $x MED00001057
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120