-
Something wrong with this record ?
The diagnostic performance of CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension-systematic review and meta-analysis
L. Lambert, P. Michalek, A. Burgetova
Language English Country Germany
Document type Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article, Review
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Chronic Disease MeSH
- Computed Tomography Angiography methods MeSH
- Angiography, Digital Subtraction MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pulmonary Embolism * complications diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Hypertension, Pulmonary * diagnosis MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic performance of CT of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) as a potential first-choice imaging modality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist. Six scientific databases and registers (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CTPA in suspected CTEPH in adult patients. Results were pooled separately for studies based on the evaluation of the pulmonary artery and those that relied solely on changes in parenchymal perfusion. RESULTS: Ten single-center studies with 734 patients were eligible for pooling of the diagnostic performance of CTPA by evaluation of the pulmonary artery. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) estimates for CTPA in the detection of CTEPH were 0.98, 0.99, 0.94, 1.00, 0.96, 0.96, and 292. Evaluation of perfusion changes yielded pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and DOR of 0.99, 0.84, 0.79, 0.98, 0.89, 0.89, and 98 across four studies with 278 patients. Scintigraphy, SPECT, digital subtraction angiography, right heart catheterization, pulmonary endarterectomy, and international guidelines were used to establish the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when the examination is evaluated by expert radiologists. Evaluation of parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. Further research is needed to determine the diagnostic performance of CTPA in excluding CTEPH in general radiology departments. KEY POINTS: • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended in the diagnostic workup of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). • CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when evaluated by an expert radiologist. • Evaluation of changes in parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. • Little is known about the diagnostic performance of CTPA in the detection of CTEPH in general radiology departments.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032931
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131150813.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00330-022-08804-5 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35482124
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic. lukas.lambert@vfn.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322994707
- 245 14
- $a The diagnostic performance of CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension-systematic review and meta-analysis / $c L. Lambert, P. Michalek, A. Burgetova
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic performance of CT of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) as a potential first-choice imaging modality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist. Six scientific databases and registers (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CTPA in suspected CTEPH in adult patients. Results were pooled separately for studies based on the evaluation of the pulmonary artery and those that relied solely on changes in parenchymal perfusion. RESULTS: Ten single-center studies with 734 patients were eligible for pooling of the diagnostic performance of CTPA by evaluation of the pulmonary artery. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) estimates for CTPA in the detection of CTEPH were 0.98, 0.99, 0.94, 1.00, 0.96, 0.96, and 292. Evaluation of perfusion changes yielded pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and DOR of 0.99, 0.84, 0.79, 0.98, 0.89, 0.89, and 98 across four studies with 278 patients. Scintigraphy, SPECT, digital subtraction angiography, right heart catheterization, pulmonary endarterectomy, and international guidelines were used to establish the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when the examination is evaluated by expert radiologists. Evaluation of parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. Further research is needed to determine the diagnostic performance of CTPA in excluding CTEPH in general radiology departments. KEY POINTS: • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended in the diagnostic workup of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). • CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when evaluated by an expert radiologist. • Evaluation of changes in parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. • Little is known about the diagnostic performance of CTPA in the detection of CTEPH in general radiology departments.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a plicní hypertenze $x diagnóza $7 D006976
- 650 12
- $a plicní embolie $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D011655
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a CT angiografie $x metody $7 D000072226
- 650 _2
- $a digitální subtrakční angiografie $7 D015901
- 650 _2
- $a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Michalek, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009646 $t European radiology $x 1432-1084 $g Roč. 32, č. 11 (2022), s. 7927-7935
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35482124 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131150810 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891598 $s 1184266
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 32 $c 11 $d 7927-7935 $e 20220428 $i 1432-1084 $m European radiology $n Eur Radiol $x MED00009646
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120