Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The diagnostic performance of CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension-systematic review and meta-analysis

L. Lambert, P. Michalek, A. Burgetova

. 2022 ; 32 (11) : 7927-7935. [pub] 20220428

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22032931

OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic performance of CT of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) as a potential first-choice imaging modality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist. Six scientific databases and registers (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CTPA in suspected CTEPH in adult patients. Results were pooled separately for studies based on the evaluation of the pulmonary artery and those that relied solely on changes in parenchymal perfusion. RESULTS: Ten single-center studies with 734 patients were eligible for pooling of the diagnostic performance of CTPA by evaluation of the pulmonary artery. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) estimates for CTPA in the detection of CTEPH were 0.98, 0.99, 0.94, 1.00, 0.96, 0.96, and 292. Evaluation of perfusion changes yielded pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and DOR of 0.99, 0.84, 0.79, 0.98, 0.89, 0.89, and 98 across four studies with 278 patients. Scintigraphy, SPECT, digital subtraction angiography, right heart catheterization, pulmonary endarterectomy, and international guidelines were used to establish the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when the examination is evaluated by expert radiologists. Evaluation of parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. Further research is needed to determine the diagnostic performance of CTPA in excluding CTEPH in general radiology departments. KEY POINTS: • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended in the diagnostic workup of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). • CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when evaluated by an expert radiologist. • Evaluation of changes in parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. • Little is known about the diagnostic performance of CTPA in the detection of CTEPH in general radiology departments.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032931
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150813.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00330-022-08804-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35482124
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic. lukas.lambert@vfn.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322994707
245    14
$a The diagnostic performance of CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension-systematic review and meta-analysis / $c L. Lambert, P. Michalek, A. Burgetova
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic performance of CT of the pulmonary artery (CTPA) as a potential first-choice imaging modality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist. Six scientific databases and registers (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CTPA in suspected CTEPH in adult patients. Results were pooled separately for studies based on the evaluation of the pulmonary artery and those that relied solely on changes in parenchymal perfusion. RESULTS: Ten single-center studies with 734 patients were eligible for pooling of the diagnostic performance of CTPA by evaluation of the pulmonary artery. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) estimates for CTPA in the detection of CTEPH were 0.98, 0.99, 0.94, 1.00, 0.96, 0.96, and 292. Evaluation of perfusion changes yielded pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and DOR of 0.99, 0.84, 0.79, 0.98, 0.89, 0.89, and 98 across four studies with 278 patients. Scintigraphy, SPECT, digital subtraction angiography, right heart catheterization, pulmonary endarterectomy, and international guidelines were used to establish the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when the examination is evaluated by expert radiologists. Evaluation of parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. Further research is needed to determine the diagnostic performance of CTPA in excluding CTEPH in general radiology departments. KEY POINTS: • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended in the diagnostic workup of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). • CTPA has high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of CTEPH when evaluated by an expert radiologist. • Evaluation of changes in parenchymal perfusion alone is associated with slightly lower specificity. • Little is known about the diagnostic performance of CTPA in the detection of CTEPH in general radiology departments.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a plicní hypertenze $x diagnóza $7 D006976
650    12
$a plicní embolie $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D011655
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a CT angiografie $x metody $7 D000072226
650    _2
$a digitální subtrakční angiografie $7 D015901
650    _2
$a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Michalek, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague 2, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009646 $t European radiology $x 1432-1084 $g Roč. 32, č. 11 (2022), s. 7927-7935
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35482124 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150810 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891598 $s 1184266
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 32 $c 11 $d 7927-7935 $e 20220428 $i 1432-1084 $m European radiology $n Eur Radiol $x MED00009646
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...