-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Central versus Peripheral CTEPH-Clinical and Hemodynamic Specifications
M. Kaldararova, I. Simkova, M. Bohacekova, A. Reptova, T. Hlavata, J. Pacak, J. Lindner, P. Jansa
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2007
PubMed Central
od 2018
Europe PubMed Central
od 2018
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2007
PubMed
36363494
DOI
10.3390/medicina58111538
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cévní rezistence MeSH
- chronická nemoc MeSH
- hemodynamika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- plíce MeSH
- plicní embolie * komplikace MeSH
- plicní hypertenze * komplikace farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background and Objectives: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a chronic progressive disease, resulting from persistent arterial obstruction combined with small-vessel remodeling. Central and peripheral CTEPH are distinguished, according to the dominant lesion's location. This is important for surgical or percutaneous interventional assessment or for medical treatment. Material and Methods: Eighty-one patients (51 male/30 female) with confirmed CTEPH were analyzed, while the CENTRAL type included 51 patients (63%) and the PERIPHERAL type 30 patients (37%). Results: A significant difference in CENTRAL type vs. PERIPHERAL type was determined in gender (male 72.5% vs. 46.7%; p = 0.0198). No difference was found in age, functional status, or echocardiographic parameters. Invasive hemodynamic parameters showed a significant difference in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (46 vs. 58 mmHg; p = 0.0002), transpulmonary gradient (34 vs. 47 mmHg; p = 0.0005), and cardiac index (2.04 vs. 2.5 L.min.m2; p = 0.02) but not in pulmonary vascular resistance. Risk factors showed a significant difference only in acute pulmonary embolism (93.8% vs. 60%; p = 0.0002) and malignancy (2% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.0426). Conclusions: Our study showed hemodynamic differences between CENTRAL type vs. PERIPHERAL type CTEPH with a worse hemodynamic picture in CENTRAL form. This may indicate a different pathophysiological response and/or possible additional influences contributing especially to the peripheral pulmonary bed affection.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032967
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240801112254.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/medicina58111538 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36363494
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Kaldarárová, Monika, $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia $d 1968- $7 xx0320891
- 245 10
- $a Central versus Peripheral CTEPH-Clinical and Hemodynamic Specifications / $c M. Kaldararova, I. Simkova, M. Bohacekova, A. Reptova, T. Hlavata, J. Pacak, J. Lindner, P. Jansa
- 520 9_
- $a Background and Objectives: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a chronic progressive disease, resulting from persistent arterial obstruction combined with small-vessel remodeling. Central and peripheral CTEPH are distinguished, according to the dominant lesion's location. This is important for surgical or percutaneous interventional assessment or for medical treatment. Material and Methods: Eighty-one patients (51 male/30 female) with confirmed CTEPH were analyzed, while the CENTRAL type included 51 patients (63%) and the PERIPHERAL type 30 patients (37%). Results: A significant difference in CENTRAL type vs. PERIPHERAL type was determined in gender (male 72.5% vs. 46.7%; p = 0.0198). No difference was found in age, functional status, or echocardiographic parameters. Invasive hemodynamic parameters showed a significant difference in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (46 vs. 58 mmHg; p = 0.0002), transpulmonary gradient (34 vs. 47 mmHg; p = 0.0005), and cardiac index (2.04 vs. 2.5 L.min.m2; p = 0.02) but not in pulmonary vascular resistance. Risk factors showed a significant difference only in acute pulmonary embolism (93.8% vs. 60%; p = 0.0002) and malignancy (2% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.0426). Conclusions: Our study showed hemodynamic differences between CENTRAL type vs. PERIPHERAL type CTEPH with a worse hemodynamic picture in CENTRAL form. This may indicate a different pathophysiological response and/or possible additional influences contributing especially to the peripheral pulmonary bed affection.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a plicní hypertenze $x komplikace $x farmakoterapie $7 D006976
- 650 12
- $a plicní embolie $x komplikace $7 D011655
- 650 _2
- $a hemodynamika $7 D006439
- 650 _2
- $a plíce $7 D008168
- 650 _2
- $a cévní rezistence $7 D014655
- 650 _2
- $a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Simkova, Iveta $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Bohacekova, Marcela $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Reptova, Adriana $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Hlavata, Tereza $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Pacak, Jozef $u Department of Cardiology and Angiology, CTEPH Expert Centre, Medical Faculty, The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Pod Krasnou horkou 1, 833 48 Bratislava, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Lindner, Jaroslav $u 2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, U nemocnice 2, 128 02 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jansa, Pavel $u Center for Pulmonary Hypertension, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, U nemocnice 2, 128 02 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180386 $t Medicina $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 58, č. 11 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36363494 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240801112251 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891625 $s 1184302
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 58 $c 11 $e 20221027 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120