Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

QRS micro-fragmentation as a mortality predictor

K. Hnatkova, I. Andršová, T. Novotný, A. Britton, M. Shipley, B. Vandenberk, DJ. Sprenkeler, J. Junttila, T. Reichlin, S. Schlögl, MA. Vos, T. Friede, A. Bauer, HV. Huikuri, R. Willems, G. Schmidt, MR. Franz, C. Sticherling, M. Zabel, M. Malik

. 2022 ; 43 (40) : 4177-4191. [pub] 2022Oct21

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22033014

Grantová podpora
MR/M006638/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
NH/16/2/32499 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom

AIMS: Fragmented QRS complex with visible notching on standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is understood to represent depolarization abnormalities and to signify risk of cardiac events. Depolarization abnormalities with similar prognostic implications likely exist beyond visual recognition but no technology is presently suitable for quantification of such invisible ECG abnormalities. We present such a technology. METHODS AND RESULTS: A signal processing method projects all ECG leads of the QRS complex into optimized three perpendicular dimensions, reconstructs the ECG back from this three-dimensional projection, and quantifies the difference (QRS 'micro'-fragmentation, QRS-μf) between the original and reconstructed signals. QRS 'micro'-fragmentation was assessed in three different populations: cardiac patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac patients with severe abnormalities, and general public. The predictive value of QRS-μf for mortality was investigated both univariably and in multivariable comparisons with other risk factors including visible QRS 'macro'-fragmentation, QRS-Mf. The analysis was made in a total of 7779 subjects of whom 504 have not survived the first 5 years of follow-up. In all three populations, QRS-μf was strongly predictive of survival (P < 0.001 univariably, and P < 0.001 to P = 0.024 in multivariable regression analyses). A similar strong association with outcome was found when dichotomizing QRS-μf prospectively at 3.5%. When QRS-μf was used in multivariable analyses, QRS-Mf and QRS duration lost their predictive value. CONCLUSION: In three populations with different clinical characteristics, QRS-μf was a powerful mortality risk factor independent of several previously established risk indices. Electrophysiologic abnormalities that contribute to increased QRS-μf values are likely responsible for the predictive power of visible QRS-Mf.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033014
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151055.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac085 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35187560
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hnatkova, Katerina $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Road, Shepherd's Bush, London W12 0NN, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000201591610
245    10
$a QRS micro-fragmentation as a mortality predictor / $c K. Hnatkova, I. Andršová, T. Novotný, A. Britton, M. Shipley, B. Vandenberk, DJ. Sprenkeler, J. Junttila, T. Reichlin, S. Schlögl, MA. Vos, T. Friede, A. Bauer, HV. Huikuri, R. Willems, G. Schmidt, MR. Franz, C. Sticherling, M. Zabel, M. Malik
520    9_
$a AIMS: Fragmented QRS complex with visible notching on standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is understood to represent depolarization abnormalities and to signify risk of cardiac events. Depolarization abnormalities with similar prognostic implications likely exist beyond visual recognition but no technology is presently suitable for quantification of such invisible ECG abnormalities. We present such a technology. METHODS AND RESULTS: A signal processing method projects all ECG leads of the QRS complex into optimized three perpendicular dimensions, reconstructs the ECG back from this three-dimensional projection, and quantifies the difference (QRS 'micro'-fragmentation, QRS-μf) between the original and reconstructed signals. QRS 'micro'-fragmentation was assessed in three different populations: cardiac patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac patients with severe abnormalities, and general public. The predictive value of QRS-μf for mortality was investigated both univariably and in multivariable comparisons with other risk factors including visible QRS 'macro'-fragmentation, QRS-Mf. The analysis was made in a total of 7779 subjects of whom 504 have not survived the first 5 years of follow-up. In all three populations, QRS-μf was strongly predictive of survival (P < 0.001 univariably, and P < 0.001 to P = 0.024 in multivariable regression analyses). A similar strong association with outcome was found when dichotomizing QRS-μf prospectively at 3.5%. When QRS-μf was used in multivariable analyses, QRS-Mf and QRS duration lost their predictive value. CONCLUSION: In three populations with different clinical characteristics, QRS-μf was a powerful mortality risk factor independent of several previously established risk indices. Electrophysiologic abnormalities that contribute to increased QRS-μf values are likely responsible for the predictive power of visible QRS-Mf.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Andršová, Irena $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000189735967
700    1_
$a Novotný, Tomáš $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000202924034
700    1_
$a Britton, Annie $u Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
700    1_
$a Shipley, Martin $u Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
700    1_
$a Vandenberk, Bert $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/000000018296920X
700    1_
$a Sprenkeler, David J $u Department of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/000000031572280X
700    1_
$a Junttila, Juhani $u Medical Research Center Oulu, University Central Hospital of Oulu and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000288961281
700    1_
$a Reichlin, Tobias $u Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000271978415
700    1_
$a Schlögl, Simon $u Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany $u German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
700    1_
$a Vos, Marc A $u Department of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Friede, Tim $u German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany $u Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000153477441
700    1_
$a Bauer, Axel $u University Hospital for Internal Medicine III, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000192018555
700    1_
$a Huikuri, Heikki V $u Medical Research Center Oulu, University Central Hospital of Oulu and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
700    1_
$a Willems, Rik $u Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254699609
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Georg $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany $u German Center for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000336925243
700    1_
$a Franz, Michael R $u Veteran Affairs and Georgetown University Medical Centers, Washington, DC, USA
700    1_
$a Sticherling, Christian $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000184287050
700    1_
$a Zabel, Markus $u Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany $u German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308954602
700    1_
$a Malik, Marek $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Road, Shepherd's Bush, London W12 0NN, UK $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000237921407
773    0_
$w MED00009622 $t European heart journal $x 1522-9645 $g Roč. 43, č. 40 (2022), s. 4177-4191
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35187560 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151051 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891652 $s 1184349
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 43 $c 40 $d 4177-4191 $e 2022Oct21 $i 1522-9645 $m European heart journal $n Eur Heart J $x MED00009622
GRA    __
$a MR/M006638/1 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a NH/16/2/32499 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace