Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Post-Isometric Back Squat Performance Enhancement of Squat and Countermovement Jump

M. Spieszny, R. Trybulski, P. Biel, A. Zając, M. Krzysztofik

. 2022 ; 19 (19) : . [pub] 20221005

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

The effectiveness of isometric conditioning activity (CA) is not well described in terms of the level of performance enhancement and the presence of a stretch and shortening cycle in subsequent explosive tasks. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a maximum isometric squat as the CA and a subsequent squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height. A total of 31 semi-professional handball and soccer players were randomly assigned to two different conditions: (i) 3 sets of 3 repetitions (each lasting 3 s) of maximum isometric back squats (EXP), and (ii) no CA (CTRL). The jump height measurements were performed 5 min before the CA and approximately at the 4th and 8th minute following the completion of the CA. Due to the high inter-individual variability in the potentiation responses, the best value obtained post-CA was also analyzed. The SJ height significantly increased from baseline to the 8th minute post-CA (p = 0.004; ES = 0.31; Δ = +3.1 ± 5.0%) in the EXP condition. On the other hand, the CMJ height was significantly higher in the 4th (p = 0.001; ES = 0.23; Δ = +2.7 ± 3.7%) and 8th minute post-CA (p = 0.005; ES = 0.32; Δ = +3.6 ± 5.7%) in comparison to baseline during the EXP condition. Furthermore, SJ height significantly increased from baseline to the best time-point during the EXP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.47; Δ = +4.9 ± 4.9%) and CTRL (p = 0.038; ES = 0.21; Δ = +2.5 ± 5.8%) condition. Moreover, the CMJ height was significantly higher at the best time-points than at the baseline during EXP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.53; Δ = +5.6 ± 4.7%) and CTRL (p = 0.002; ES = 0.38; Δ = +3.1 ± 5.2%) condition. The findings from this study indicate that a maximum isometric squat, used as a CA, effectively improved SJ and CMJ height. This suggests that the presence or absence of a stretch and shortening cycle in both CA and post-CA tasks does not significantly impact the post-activation performance enhancement response.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033121
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151338.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijerph191912720 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36232019
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Spieszny, Michał $u Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Physical Education in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299346911
245    10
$a Post-Isometric Back Squat Performance Enhancement of Squat and Countermovement Jump / $c M. Spieszny, R. Trybulski, P. Biel, A. Zając, M. Krzysztofik
520    9_
$a The effectiveness of isometric conditioning activity (CA) is not well described in terms of the level of performance enhancement and the presence of a stretch and shortening cycle in subsequent explosive tasks. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a maximum isometric squat as the CA and a subsequent squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height. A total of 31 semi-professional handball and soccer players were randomly assigned to two different conditions: (i) 3 sets of 3 repetitions (each lasting 3 s) of maximum isometric back squats (EXP), and (ii) no CA (CTRL). The jump height measurements were performed 5 min before the CA and approximately at the 4th and 8th minute following the completion of the CA. Due to the high inter-individual variability in the potentiation responses, the best value obtained post-CA was also analyzed. The SJ height significantly increased from baseline to the 8th minute post-CA (p = 0.004; ES = 0.31; Δ = +3.1 ± 5.0%) in the EXP condition. On the other hand, the CMJ height was significantly higher in the 4th (p = 0.001; ES = 0.23; Δ = +2.7 ± 3.7%) and 8th minute post-CA (p = 0.005; ES = 0.32; Δ = +3.6 ± 5.7%) in comparison to baseline during the EXP condition. Furthermore, SJ height significantly increased from baseline to the best time-point during the EXP (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.47; Δ = +4.9 ± 4.9%) and CTRL (p = 0.038; ES = 0.21; Δ = +2.5 ± 5.8%) condition. Moreover, the CMJ height was significantly higher at the best time-points than at the baseline during EXP (p &lt; 0.001; ES = 0.53; Δ = +5.6 ± 4.7%) and CTRL (p = 0.002; ES = 0.38; Δ = +3.1 ± 5.2%) condition. The findings from this study indicate that a maximum isometric squat, used as a CA, effectively improved SJ and CMJ height. This suggests that the presence or absence of a stretch and shortening cycle in both CA and post-CA tasks does not significantly impact the post-activation performance enhancement response.
650    _2
$a tělesná výška $7 D001827
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a svalová síla $x fyziologie $7 D053580
650    _2
$a postura těla $7 D011187
650    12
$a fotbal $7 D012916
650    12
$a sporty $7 D013177
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Trybulski, Robert $u Provita Zory Medical Center, 44-240 Zory, Poland $u Department of Medical Sciences, The Wojciech Korfanty School of Economics, 40-659 Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Biel, Piotr $u Department of Sport and Physical Education, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
700    1_
$a Zając, Adam $u Institute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065 Katowice, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243744822
700    1_
$a Krzysztofik, Michał $u Institute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065 Katowice, Poland $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000327978431
773    0_
$w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 19, č. 19 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36232019 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151334 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891716 $s 1184456
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 19 $c 19 $e 20221005 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...