-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Violence risk and personality assessment in adolescents by Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) and high school personality questionnaire (HSPQ): Focus on protective factors strengthening
P. Skřivánková, M. Páv, K. Faberová, D. Perkins, H. Boukalová, D. Adam, A. Mazouchová, I. Gillernová, M. Anders, E. Kitzlerová
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2009
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2010
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Adolescents are most at risk of engaging in violent interaction. Targeting violence risk and protective factors is essential for correctly understanding and assessing their role in potential violence. We aimed to use the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) tool within the sample of adolescents to capture violence risk and protective factors and personality variables related to risk and protective factors. We further aimed to identify which violence risk and protective factors were positively or negatively related to violence within personal history and if any personality traits are typical for violent and non-violent adolescents. Identifying broader or underlying constructs within the SAVRY tool factor analysis can enable appropriate therapeutic targeting. METHODS: We used the Czech standardized version of the SAVRY tool. The study sample comprised 175 men and 226 women aged 12-18 years divided into two categories according to the presence or absence of violence in their personal history. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare numerical variables between the two groups. SAVRY factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to determine the item factors. We administered the High School Personality Questionnaire (HSPQ) to capture adolescents' personality characteristics. RESULTS: In our sample, there were 151 participants with violence in their personal histories and 250 non-violent participants. Non-violent adolescents had higher values for all six SAVRY protective factors. The strongest protective factor was P3, Strong attachment and bonds across gender or a history of violence. Using factor analysis, we identified three SAVRY internal factors: social conduct, assimilation, and maladaptation. The SAVRY protective factors were significantly positively related to several factors in the HSPQ questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the significance of protective factors and their relationship with violence prevalence. HSPQ diagnostics could be helpful in clinically targeting personality-based violence risks and protective factors. The therapeutic focus should be on tension, peer rejection, and anxiety. It is also essential to foster positive attitudes toward authority, prosocial behavior, and attitudes toward school. These strategies can help strengthen protective factors of the SAVRY.
Department of Economic Statistics University of Economics and Business Prague Czechia
Department of Law and Criminology Royal Holloway University of London Egham United Kingdom
Department of Psychiatry Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital Prague Czechia
Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czechia
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic Prague Czechia
West London Mental Health NHS Trust Broadmoor Hospital London United Kingdom
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23003182
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230421095941.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230413s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1067450 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36704730
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Skřivánková, Petra $u Department of Psychiatry, Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Violence risk and personality assessment in adolescents by Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) and high school personality questionnaire (HSPQ): Focus on protective factors strengthening / $c P. Skřivánková, M. Páv, K. Faberová, D. Perkins, H. Boukalová, D. Adam, A. Mazouchová, I. Gillernová, M. Anders, E. Kitzlerová
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Adolescents are most at risk of engaging in violent interaction. Targeting violence risk and protective factors is essential for correctly understanding and assessing their role in potential violence. We aimed to use the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) tool within the sample of adolescents to capture violence risk and protective factors and personality variables related to risk and protective factors. We further aimed to identify which violence risk and protective factors were positively or negatively related to violence within personal history and if any personality traits are typical for violent and non-violent adolescents. Identifying broader or underlying constructs within the SAVRY tool factor analysis can enable appropriate therapeutic targeting. METHODS: We used the Czech standardized version of the SAVRY tool. The study sample comprised 175 men and 226 women aged 12-18 years divided into two categories according to the presence or absence of violence in their personal history. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare numerical variables between the two groups. SAVRY factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to determine the item factors. We administered the High School Personality Questionnaire (HSPQ) to capture adolescents' personality characteristics. RESULTS: In our sample, there were 151 participants with violence in their personal histories and 250 non-violent participants. Non-violent adolescents had higher values for all six SAVRY protective factors. The strongest protective factor was P3, Strong attachment and bonds across gender or a history of violence. Using factor analysis, we identified three SAVRY internal factors: social conduct, assimilation, and maladaptation. The SAVRY protective factors were significantly positively related to several factors in the HSPQ questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the significance of protective factors and their relationship with violence prevalence. HSPQ diagnostics could be helpful in clinically targeting personality-based violence risks and protective factors. The therapeutic focus should be on tension, peer rejection, and anxiety. It is also essential to foster positive attitudes toward authority, prosocial behavior, and attitudes toward school. These strategies can help strengthen protective factors of the SAVRY.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Páv, Marek $u Department of Psychiatry, Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Faberová, Karolína $u Department of Law and Criminology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Perkins, Derek $u Department of Law and Criminology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom $u West London Mental Health NHS Trust, Broadmoor Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Boukalová, Hedvika $u Police Presidium of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Adam, David $u Department of Psychiatry, Bohnice Psychiatric Hospital, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Mazouchová, Aneta $u Department of Economic Statistics, University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Gillernová, Ilona $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Anders, Martin $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kitzlerová, Eva $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174602 $t Frontiers in psychiatry $x 1664-0640 $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 1067450
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36704730 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230421095933 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1922806 $s 1189389
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 1067450 $e 20230110 $i 1664-0640 $m Frontiers in psychiatry $n Front Psychiatry $x MED00174602
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230413