AIM: Assessment of islet mass before islet transplantation requires a reliable technique to enable exact analysis of islet volume. This study aimed to test the applicability of digital image analysis (DIA) for evaluation of samples of purified and non-purified islets. METHODS: Pancreatic islets were isolated from 10 Lewis rats. Samples of purified (n = 10) and non-purified islets (n = 30) were counted conventionally and by using a computerized method. The equipment for the computerized counting consisted of a digital camera installed on a stereomicroscope and connected to a personal computer. Images of 2272x1704 pixels were processed using a previously described non-commercial program originally developed for this purpose. Islets were converted to equivalents using globe and ellipsoid models. The insulin content of purified islets was assessed using radioimmunoassay and was correlated to the absolute and standardized islet number. RESULTS: Mean absolute numbers of purified islets +/- SD were 908 +/- 130 and 1049 +/- 230 (manually and DIA respectively). Mean insulin content +/- SD obtained from purified islets was 161 +/- 45 mU. The mean equivalents of purified islets (1589 +/- 555 for globe and 1219 +/- 452 for ellipsoid) significantly correlated with insulin content. However, this correlation was not significant when absolute islet numbers were used, counted using either method. There was no significant difference in absolute non-purified islet numbers assessed by manual and computerized methods (average +/- SD in 50 microl samples; 12.6 +/- 4.1 and 13.3 +/- 5.3 respectively; p = 0.22). The manual method showed a significantly higher yield of islet equivalents (IE; p < 0.001 for both globe and ellipsoid). CONCLUSION: The computer-based system for islet counting correlated better to insulin content than conventional islet estimation and prevented overestimation. Reproducibility and ease of assessment make it potentially applicable to clinical islet transplantation.

Diabetes Center Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ryan EA, Lakey JR, Rajotte RV, Korbutt GS, Kin T, Imes S, Rabinovitch A, Elliott JF, Bigam D, Kneteman NM et al. Clinical outcomes and insulin secretion after islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol. Diabetes. 2001;50(4):710–719. PubMed

Hesse U, Sutherland DE, Florack G, Field J, Ward S, Najarian JS. Comparison of two methods of islet preparation and transplantation in dogs. Diabetes. 1986;35(10):1109–1118. PubMed

Jindal RM, Taylor RP, Gray DW, Esmeraldo R, Morris PJ. A new method for quantification of islets by measurement of zinc content. Diabetes. 1992;41(9):1056–1062. PubMed

Lehmann R, Fernandez LA, Bottino R, Szabo S, Ricordi C, Alejandro R, Kenyon NS. Evaluation of islet isolation by a new automated method (Coulter Multisizer Ile) and manual counting. Transplant Proc. 1998;30(2):373–374. PubMed

Gray DW, Gohde W, Carter N, Heiden T, Morris PJ. Separation of pancreatic islets by fluorescence-activated sorting. Diabetes. 1989;38(Suppl 1):133–135. PubMed

Merchant FA, Diller KR, Aggarwal SJ, Bovik AC. Viability analysis of cryopreserved rat pancreatic islets using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Cryobiology. 1996;33(2):236–252. PubMed

Brissova M, Fowler MJ, Nicholson WE, Chu A, Hirshberg B, Harlan DM, Powers AC. Assessment of human pancreatic islet architecture and composition by laser scanning confocal microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005;53(9):1087–1097. PubMed

Ricordi C, Gray DW, Hering BJ, Kaufman DB, Warnock GL, Kneteman NM, Lake SP, London NJ, Socci C, Alejandro R et al. Islet isolation assessment in man and large animals. Acta Diabetol Lat. 1990;27(3):185–195. PubMed

Fetterhoff TJ, Wile KJ, Coffing D, Cavanagh T, Wright MJ. Quantitation of isolated pancreatic islets using imaging technology. Transplant Proc. 1994;26(6):3351. PubMed

Stegemann JP, O'Neil JJ, Nicholson DT, Mullon CJ, Solomon BA. Automated counting and sizing of isolated porcine islets using digital image analysis. Transplant Proc. 1997;29(4):2272–2273. PubMed

Stegemann JP, O'Neil JJ, Nicholson DT, Mullon CJ. Improved assessment of isolated islet tissue volume using digital image analysis. Cell Transplant. 1998;7(5):469–478. PubMed

Friberg A, Stahle M, Svensson A, Korsgren O, Brandhorst D. Digital image analysis of islet samples yields consistent, reproducible results. CTS-IPITA-IXA 2007 Joint Conference; Minneapolis. 2007.

Kissler HJ, Zhang X, Chen X, Kaufman DB. Software digital image analysis to assess the islet yield of human islet products. Abstract 1529; The 2006 World Transplant Congress; Boston, MA. 2006.

Niclauss N, Morel PH, Sgroi A, Baertschiger R, Wojtusciszyn A, Berney T, Bosco D. Computer-assisted digital image analysis of human islets. 27th Workshop of the AIDPIT Study Group; 2nd European Diabetes Technology and Transplantation Meeting (EuDDT); Igls. 2008. PubMed

Girman P, Kriz J, Friedmansky J, Saudek F. Digital imaging as a possible approach in evaluation of islet yield. Cell Transplant. 2003;12(2):129–133. PubMed

Saudek F, Cihalova E, Karasova L, Kobylka P, Lomsky R. Increased glucagon-stimulated insulin secretion of cryopreserved rat islets transplanted into nude mice. J Mol Med. 1999;77(1):107–110. PubMed

Kriz J, Saudek F, Girman P, Novota P. Enhancement of rat islet tolerance with bone marrow transplantation using a non-myeloablative procedure II: failure despite the presence of lymphocyte microchimerism in the fully allogeneic Lewis/Brown-Norway model. Int J Tissue React. 2004;26(3-4):75–83. PubMed

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310. PubMed

Pisania A, Weir CG, Colton CK. Comparison of light and electron microscopy for estimating islet fraction and enumeration of islet equivalents with nuclei counting. The 2006 World Transplant Congress; Boston, MA. 2006.

Bock T, Svenstrup K, Pakkenberg B, Buschard K. Unbiased estimation of total beta-cell number and mean beta-cell volume in rodent pancreas. Apmis. 1999;107(8):791–799. PubMed

Inuwa IM, El Mardi AS. Correlation between volume fraction and volume-weighted mean volume, and between total number and total mass of islets in post-weaning and young Wistar rats. J Anat. 2005;206(2):185–192. PubMed PMC

Goldstein MB, Davis EA Jr. The three dimensional architecture of the islets of Langerhans. Acta Anat (Basel) 1968;71(2):161–171. PubMed

Kriz J, Jirak D, Girman P, Berkova Z, Zacharovova K, Honsova E, Lodererova A, Hajek M, Saudek F. Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets in tolerance and rejection. Transplantation. 2005;80(11):1596–1603. PubMed

Moore A, Bonner-Weir S, Weissleder R. Noninvasive in vivo measurement of beta-cell mass in mouse model of diabetes. Diabetes. 2001;50(10):2231–2236. PubMed

Toso C, Zaidi H, Morel P, Armanet M, Wojtusciszyn A, Mai G, Baertschiger R, Buhler L, Berney T. Assessment of 18F-FDG-leukocyte imaging to monitor rejection after pancreatic islet transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(9):3033–3034. PubMed