Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Influence of diabetes on sacubitril/valsartan titration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure

KK. Witte, R. Wachter, M. Senni, J. Belohlavek, E. Straburzynska-Migaj, C. Fonseca, E. Lonn, A. Noè, H. Schwende, D. Butylin, Y. Chiang, D. Pascual-Figal, TRANSITION investigators

. 2023 ; 10 (1) : 80-89. [pub] 20220920

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

AIMS: Diabetes mellitus is associated with worse outcomes and lower attainment of disease-modifying therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This post hoc analysis of TRANSITION compared the patterns of tolerability and uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF stabilized after hospital admission due to acute decompensated HF depending on the presence or absence of diabetes as a co-morbidity. METHODS: TRANSITION, a randomized, open-label study compared sacubitril/valsartan initiation pre-discharge vs. post-discharge (up to14 days) in 991 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated HFrEF. The impact of diabetes status on tolerability and safety was studied at 10-week and 26-week post-randomization. RESULTS: Among the 991 patients analysed at baseline, 460 (46.4%) had diabetes and exhibited a higher risk profile. At 10 weeks, sacubitril/valsartan target dose (97/103 mg bid) was achieved in a similar proportion of patients in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge respectively [diabetes subgroup: 47% (n = 105/226) vs. 50% (n = 115/228); relative risk ratio (RRR), 0.923; P = 0.412; non-diabetes subgroup: 45% (n = 119/267) vs. 51% (n = 133/261); RRR, 0.878; P = 0.155]. The proportions of patients achieving and maintaining either 49/51 mg or 97/103 mg bid [diabetes subgroup: 61.1% (n = 138/226) vs. 67.5% (n = 154/228); RRR, 0.909; P = 0.175; non-diabetes subgroup: 62.9% [n = 168/267] vs 69.3% [n = 181/261]; RRR, 0.906; P = 0.118] or any dose for ≥2 weeks leading to Week 10 [diabetes subgroup: 85% (n = 192/226) vs. 88.2% (n = 201/228); RRR, 0.966; P = 0.356; non-diabetes subgroup: 86.9% (n = 232/267) vs. 90.8% (n = 237/261); RRR, 0.963; P = 0.215] were also similar in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge, respectively. At 10 weeks, hypotension and renal dysfunction rates were similar, although hyperkalaemia was higher among patients with diabetes (15.9% vs. 9.5%). The rate of permanent discontinuation due to adverse events was similar in the diabetes and non-diabetes subgroups at 10 weeks, respectively: pre-discharge (7.5% vs. 7.1%) or post-discharge (5.7% vs. 4.2%). Similar patterns of uptitration and tolerability were observed at 26 weeks. Cardiac biomarkers including NT-proBNP (P < 0.005) and hs-TnT (P < 0.005) reduced significantly from baseline levels in both subgroups at Weeks 4 and 10; however, the response was greater among patients without diabetes. Mortality (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 3.3% vs 4.0%; P = 0.438) and HF rehospitalization (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 36.3% vs. 33.0%; P = 0.295) did not differ between the groups at 26 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher risk profile among patients with diabetes, sacubitril/valsartan initiation either before or shortly after discharge in hospitalized patients with HFrEF resulted in comparable rates of dose up-titration and tolerability as in those without diabetes.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004442
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425141408.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ehf2.14166 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36125177
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Witte, Klaus K $u Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, DE; and Leeds Institute of Cardio and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000271467105
245    10
$a Influence of diabetes on sacubitril/valsartan titration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure / $c KK. Witte, R. Wachter, M. Senni, J. Belohlavek, E. Straburzynska-Migaj, C. Fonseca, E. Lonn, A. Noè, H. Schwende, D. Butylin, Y. Chiang, D. Pascual-Figal, TRANSITION investigators
520    9_
$a AIMS: Diabetes mellitus is associated with worse outcomes and lower attainment of disease-modifying therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This post hoc analysis of TRANSITION compared the patterns of tolerability and uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF stabilized after hospital admission due to acute decompensated HF depending on the presence or absence of diabetes as a co-morbidity. METHODS: TRANSITION, a randomized, open-label study compared sacubitril/valsartan initiation pre-discharge vs. post-discharge (up to14 days) in 991 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated HFrEF. The impact of diabetes status on tolerability and safety was studied at 10-week and 26-week post-randomization. RESULTS: Among the 991 patients analysed at baseline, 460 (46.4%) had diabetes and exhibited a higher risk profile. At 10 weeks, sacubitril/valsartan target dose (97/103 mg bid) was achieved in a similar proportion of patients in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge respectively [diabetes subgroup: 47% (n = 105/226) vs. 50% (n = 115/228); relative risk ratio (RRR), 0.923; P = 0.412; non-diabetes subgroup: 45% (n = 119/267) vs. 51% (n = 133/261); RRR, 0.878; P = 0.155]. The proportions of patients achieving and maintaining either 49/51 mg or 97/103 mg bid [diabetes subgroup: 61.1% (n = 138/226) vs. 67.5% (n = 154/228); RRR, 0.909; P = 0.175; non-diabetes subgroup: 62.9% [n = 168/267] vs 69.3% [n = 181/261]; RRR, 0.906; P = 0.118] or any dose for ≥2 weeks leading to Week 10 [diabetes subgroup: 85% (n = 192/226) vs. 88.2% (n = 201/228); RRR, 0.966; P = 0.356; non-diabetes subgroup: 86.9% (n = 232/267) vs. 90.8% (n = 237/261); RRR, 0.963; P = 0.215] were also similar in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge, respectively. At 10 weeks, hypotension and renal dysfunction rates were similar, although hyperkalaemia was higher among patients with diabetes (15.9% vs. 9.5%). The rate of permanent discontinuation due to adverse events was similar in the diabetes and non-diabetes subgroups at 10 weeks, respectively: pre-discharge (7.5% vs. 7.1%) or post-discharge (5.7% vs. 4.2%). Similar patterns of uptitration and tolerability were observed at 26 weeks. Cardiac biomarkers including NT-proBNP (P < 0.005) and hs-TnT (P < 0.005) reduced significantly from baseline levels in both subgroups at Weeks 4 and 10; however, the response was greater among patients without diabetes. Mortality (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 3.3% vs 4.0%; P = 0.438) and HF rehospitalization (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 36.3% vs. 33.0%; P = 0.295) did not differ between the groups at 26 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher risk profile among patients with diabetes, sacubitril/valsartan initiation either before or shortly after discharge in hospitalized patients with HFrEF resulted in comparable rates of dose up-titration and tolerability as in those without diabetes.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a následná péče $7 D000359
650    _2
$a aminobutyráty $x terapeutické užití $7 D000613
650    _2
$a antagonisté receptorů pro angiotenzin $x terapeutické užití $7 D057911
650    _2
$a bifenylové sloučeniny $x terapeutické užití $7 D001713
650    12
$a diabetes mellitus $7 D003920
650    12
$a srdeční selhání $7 D006333
650    _2
$a propuštění pacienta $7 D010351
650    _2
$a tepový objem $x fyziologie $7 D013318
650    _2
$a tetrazoly $x terapeutické užití $7 D013777
650    _2
$a valsartan $x terapeutické užití $7 D000068756
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Wachter, Rolf $u Department of Cardiology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
700    1_
$a Senni, Michele $u Cardiovascular Department & Cardiology Unit, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
700    1_
$a Belohlavek, Jan $u 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Straburzynska-Migaj, Ewa $u 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
700    1_
$a Fonseca, Candida $u Hospital de Sao Francisco Xavier, Lisbon, Portugal
700    1_
$a Lonn, Eva $u Department of Medicine and Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
700    1_
$a Noè, Adele $u Cardio Renal and Metabolic Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Schwende, Heike $u Cardio Renal and Metabolic Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Butylin, Dmytro $u Cardio Renal and Metabolic Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Chiang, YannTong $u Cardio, Renal and Metabolic Department, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA
700    1_
$a Pascual-Figal, Domingo $u Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain & Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain
710    2_
$a TRANSITION investigators
773    0_
$w MED00197251 $t ESC heart failure $x 2055-5822 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2023), s. 80-89
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36125177 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425141404 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1924872 $s 1190651
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 10 $c 1 $d 80-89 $e 20220920 $i 2055-5822 $m ESC heart failure $n ESC Heart Fail $x MED00197251
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...