-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prediction of pre-hospital blood transfusion in trauma patients based on scoring systems
M. Plodr, J. Berková, R. Hyšpler, A. Truhlář, J. Páral, J. Kočí
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-06-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- krevní transfuze * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemocnice MeSH
- rány a poranění * terapie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital blood transfusion (PHBT) is a safe and gradually expanding procedure applied to trauma patients. A proper decision to activate PHBT with the presently limited diagnostic options at the site of an incident poses a challenge for pre-hospital crews. The purpose of this study was to compare the selected scoring systems and to determine whether they can be used as valid tools in identifying patients with PHBT requirements. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2020. Overall, 385 patients (aged [median; IQR]: 44; 24-60; 73% males) were included in this study. The values of five selected scoring systems were calculated in all patients. To determine the accuracy of each score for the prediction of PHBT, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used and to measure the association, the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was counted (Fig. 1). RESULTS: Regarding the proper indication of PHBT, shock index (SI) and pulse pressure (PP) revealed the highest value of AUC and sensitivity/specificity ratio (SI: AUC 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.93; PP: AUC 0.85 with 95% CI 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Shock index and pulse pressure are suitable tools for predicting PHBT in trauma patients.
Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region 50012 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Faculty of Military Health Sciences University of Defence 50001 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004611
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171626.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12873-022-00770-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36635632
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Plodr, Michal $u Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, 50001, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. plodrmic@seznam.cz $u Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region, 50012, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. plodrmic@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Prediction of pre-hospital blood transfusion in trauma patients based on scoring systems / $c M. Plodr, J. Berková, R. Hyšpler, A. Truhlář, J. Páral, J. Kočí
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital blood transfusion (PHBT) is a safe and gradually expanding procedure applied to trauma patients. A proper decision to activate PHBT with the presently limited diagnostic options at the site of an incident poses a challenge for pre-hospital crews. The purpose of this study was to compare the selected scoring systems and to determine whether they can be used as valid tools in identifying patients with PHBT requirements. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2020. Overall, 385 patients (aged [median; IQR]: 44; 24-60; 73% males) were included in this study. The values of five selected scoring systems were calculated in all patients. To determine the accuracy of each score for the prediction of PHBT, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used and to measure the association, the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was counted (Fig. 1). RESULTS: Regarding the proper indication of PHBT, shock index (SI) and pulse pressure (PP) revealed the highest value of AUC and sensitivity/specificity ratio (SI: AUC 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.93; PP: AUC 0.85 with 95% CI 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Shock index and pulse pressure are suitable tools for predicting PHBT in trauma patients.
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a krevní transfuze $7 D001803
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a krevní tlak $7 D001794
- 650 _2
- $a nemocnice $7 D006761
- 650 12
- $a rány a poranění $x terapie $7 D014947
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Berková, Jana $u Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region, 50012, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Emergency Medicine, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hyšpler, Radomír $u Department of Clinical Chemistry, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Truhlář, Anatolij $u Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region, 50012, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Anestesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Páral, Jiří $u Department of Surgery, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kočí, Jaromír $u Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region, 50012, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Emergency Medicine, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50003, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006825 $t BMC emergency medicine $x 1471-227X $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2023), s. 2
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36635632 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171622 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924981 $s 1190820
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 23 $c 1 $d 2 $e 20230112 $i 1471-227X $m BMC emergency medicine $n BMC Emerg Med $x MED00006825
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418