Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Changes in cognitive function after thoracoscopic and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

D. Herman, A. Javůrková, J. Raudenská, P. Budera, V. Rizov, P. Kačer, T. Peisker, M. Malý, P. Osmančík

. 2023 ; 46 (1) : 84-90. [pub] 20221210

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004751

BACKGROUND: Comparative data regarding the effect of percutaneous and thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) on cognitive function are very limited. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the effect of both types of ablations on patient cognitive functions in the mid-term. METHODS: Patients with AF indicated for ablation procedure were included. Forty-six patients underwent thoracoscopic, off-pump ablation using the COBRA Fusion radiofrequency system, followed by a catheter ablation three months afterward (Hybrid group). A comparative cohort of 53 AF patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation only (PVI group). Neuropsychological examinations were done before and nine months after the surgical or catheter ablation procedure. Neuropsychological testing comprised 13 subtests of seven domains, and the results were expressed as post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) nine months after the procedure. RESULTS: Patients in both groups were similar with respect to the baseline clinical characteristics; only non-paroxysmal AF was more common in the hybrid group (98% vs. 34%). Major POCD was present in eight (17.4%) of hybrid patients versus three (5.7%) of PVI patients (p = 0.11), combined (major/minor) worsened cognitive decline was present in 10 (21.7%) hybrid patients versus three (5.6%) PVI patients (p = 0.034). On the other hand, combined (major/minor) improvement was present in 15 (32.6%) hybrid patients versus nine (16.9%) patients in the PVI group (p = 0.099). CONCLUSION: Hybrid ablation, a combination of thoracoscopic and percutaneous ablation, is associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline compared to sole percutaneous ablation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004751
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425171712.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/pace.14634 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36428282
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Herman, Dalibor $u Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Changes in cognitive function after thoracoscopic and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation / $c D. Herman, A. Javůrková, J. Raudenská, P. Budera, V. Rizov, P. Kačer, T. Peisker, M. Malý, P. Osmančík
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Comparative data regarding the effect of percutaneous and thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) on cognitive function are very limited. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the effect of both types of ablations on patient cognitive functions in the mid-term. METHODS: Patients with AF indicated for ablation procedure were included. Forty-six patients underwent thoracoscopic, off-pump ablation using the COBRA Fusion radiofrequency system, followed by a catheter ablation three months afterward (Hybrid group). A comparative cohort of 53 AF patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation only (PVI group). Neuropsychological examinations were done before and nine months after the surgical or catheter ablation procedure. Neuropsychological testing comprised 13 subtests of seven domains, and the results were expressed as post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) nine months after the procedure. RESULTS: Patients in both groups were similar with respect to the baseline clinical characteristics; only non-paroxysmal AF was more common in the hybrid group (98% vs. 34%). Major POCD was present in eight (17.4%) of hybrid patients versus three (5.7%) of PVI patients (p = 0.11), combined (major/minor) worsened cognitive decline was present in 10 (21.7%) hybrid patients versus three (5.6%) PVI patients (p = 0.034). On the other hand, combined (major/minor) improvement was present in 15 (32.6%) hybrid patients versus nine (16.9%) patients in the PVI group (p = 0.099). CONCLUSION: Hybrid ablation, a combination of thoracoscopic and percutaneous ablation, is associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline compared to sole percutaneous ablation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a kognitivní dysfunkce $x etiologie $7 D060825
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a kognice $7 D003071
650    12
$a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Javůrková, Alena $u Department of Clinical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Nursing, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Raudenská, Jaroslava $u Department of Clinical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Nursing, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Budera, Petr $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rizov, Vitalii $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kačer, Petr $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Peisker, Tomáš $u Department of Neurology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Malý, Marek $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Osmančík, Pavel $u Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00003671 $t Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE $x 1540-8159 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2023), s. 84-90
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36428282 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425171709 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1925067 $s 1190960
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 46 $c 1 $d 84-90 $e 20221210 $i 1540-8159 $m Pacing and clinical electrophysiology $n Pacing Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00003671
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace