-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prognostic awareness in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: A longitudinal cohort study
M. Loučka, K. Vlčková, A. Tučková, K. Poláková, A. Houska, M. Matějů, Z. Donátová
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33864323
DOI
10.1002/pon.5704
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- nádory * terapie MeSH
- osoby pečující o pacienty * MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse longitudinal development of prognostic awareness in advanced cancer patients and their families. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study, involving 134 adult cancer patients, 91 primary family caregivers and 21 treating oncologists. Key eligibility criterion for patients was life expectancy less than 1 year (estimated by their oncologists using the 12-month surprised question). Structured interviews, including tools to measure prognostic awareness, health information needs, and demographics were conducted face to face or via phone three times over 9 months. Forty-four patients completed all three phases of data collection. RESULTS: Only 16% of patients reported accurate prognostic awareness, 58% being partially aware. Prognostic awareness of both patients and family caregivers remained stable over the course of the study, with only small non-significant changes. Gender, education, type of cancer, spirituality or health information needs were not associated with the level of prognostic awareness. Family caregivers reported more accurate prognostic awareness, which was not associated with patients' own prognostic awareness (agreement rate 59%, weighted kappa 0.348, CI = 0.185-0.510). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic awareness appears to be a stable concept over the course of the illness. Clinicians must focus on the initial patients' understanding of the disease and be able to communicate the prognostic information effectively from the early stages of patients' trajectory.
Center for Palliative Care Prague Czech Republic
Department of Oncology 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Sociology Faculty of Social Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Division of Medical Psychology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004972
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171826.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2021 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/pon.5704 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33864323
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Loučka, Martin $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $u Division of Medical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000298757997 $7 mzk2016899455
- 245 10
- $a Prognostic awareness in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: A longitudinal cohort study / $c M. Loučka, K. Vlčková, A. Tučková, K. Poláková, A. Houska, M. Matějů, Z. Donátová
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse longitudinal development of prognostic awareness in advanced cancer patients and their families. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study, involving 134 adult cancer patients, 91 primary family caregivers and 21 treating oncologists. Key eligibility criterion for patients was life expectancy less than 1 year (estimated by their oncologists using the 12-month surprised question). Structured interviews, including tools to measure prognostic awareness, health information needs, and demographics were conducted face to face or via phone three times over 9 months. Forty-four patients completed all three phases of data collection. RESULTS: Only 16% of patients reported accurate prognostic awareness, 58% being partially aware. Prognostic awareness of both patients and family caregivers remained stable over the course of the study, with only small non-significant changes. Gender, education, type of cancer, spirituality or health information needs were not associated with the level of prognostic awareness. Family caregivers reported more accurate prognostic awareness, which was not associated with patients' own prognostic awareness (agreement rate 59%, weighted kappa 0.348, CI = 0.185-0.510). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic awareness appears to be a stable concept over the course of the illness. Clinicians must focus on the initial patients' understanding of the disease and be able to communicate the prognostic information effectively from the early stages of patients' trajectory.
- 650 12
- $a osoby pečující o pacienty $7 D017028
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
- 650 12
- $a nádory $x terapie $7 D009369
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vlčková, Karolína $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $u Division of Medical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tučková, Anna $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Poláková, Kristýna $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $u Division of Medical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Houska, Adam $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic $u Division of Medical Psychology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Matějů, Martin $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Donátová, Zuzana $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008071 $t Psycho-oncology $x 1099-1611 $g Roč. 30, č. 9 (2021), s. 1449-1456
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33864323 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171823 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1925204 $s 1191181
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 30 $c 9 $d 1449-1456 $e 20210425 $i 1099-1611 $m Psycho-oncology $n Psychooncology $x MED00008071
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418