Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Long-Term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure to Oral Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

MV. Madhavan, JP. Howard, MI. Brener, C. Der Nigoghossian, S. Chen, R. Makkar, P. Osmancik, VY. Reddy, DR. Holmes, GW. Stone, MB. Leon, Y. Ahmad

. 2023 ; 7 (1) : 100096. [pub] 20220924

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23010181

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been considered the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; however, many individuals are unable or unwilling to take long-term OAC. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been controversial, and new trial data have recently emerged. We therefore sought to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OAC to percutaneous LAAC, focusing on individual clinical endpoints. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 through December 2021 for all RCTs comparing percutaneous LAAC to OAC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Fixed and random effects meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) were performed using the longest follow-up duration available by intention-to-treat. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Three RCTs enrolling 1516 patients were identified. The weighted mean follow-up was 54.7 months. LAAC was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; p = 0.023), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.61; p = 0.003), and major nonprocedural bleeding (HR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LAAC and OAC for any other endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from RCTs suggests LAAC therapy is associated with reduced long-term risk of death compared with OAC. This may be driven by reductions in hemorrhagic stroke and major nonprocedural bleeding. There were no significant differences in the risk of all stroke. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23010181
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230721095305.0
007      
ta
008      
230707s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100096 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37275318
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Madhavan, Mahesh V $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
245    10
$a Long-Term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure to Oral Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis / $c MV. Madhavan, JP. Howard, MI. Brener, C. Der Nigoghossian, S. Chen, R. Makkar, P. Osmancik, VY. Reddy, DR. Holmes, GW. Stone, MB. Leon, Y. Ahmad
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been considered the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; however, many individuals are unable or unwilling to take long-term OAC. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been controversial, and new trial data have recently emerged. We therefore sought to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OAC to percutaneous LAAC, focusing on individual clinical endpoints. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 through December 2021 for all RCTs comparing percutaneous LAAC to OAC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Fixed and random effects meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) were performed using the longest follow-up duration available by intention-to-treat. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Three RCTs enrolling 1516 patients were identified. The weighted mean follow-up was 54.7 months. LAAC was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; p = 0.023), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.61; p = 0.003), and major nonprocedural bleeding (HR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LAAC and OAC for any other endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from RCTs suggests LAAC therapy is associated with reduced long-term risk of death compared with OAC. This may be driven by reductions in hemorrhagic stroke and major nonprocedural bleeding. There were no significant differences in the risk of all stroke. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Howard, James P $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Brener, Michael I $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Der Nigoghossian, Caroline $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Chen, Shmuel $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Makkar, Raj $u Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u The Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA $u The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Holmes, David R $u Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
700    1_
$a Stone, Gregg W $u The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Leon, Martin B $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Ahmad, Yousif $u Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
773    0_
$w MED00211269 $t Structural heart $x 2474-8714 $g Roč. 7, č. 1 (2023), s. 100096
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37275318 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230721095258 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1958667 $s 1196445
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 7 $c 1 $d 100096 $e 20220924 $i 2474-8714 $m Structural heart $n Struct. heart $x MED00211269
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230707

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...