-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Long-Term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure to Oral Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
MV. Madhavan, JP. Howard, MI. Brener, C. Der Nigoghossian, S. Chen, R. Makkar, P. Osmancik, VY. Reddy, DR. Holmes, GW. Stone, MB. Leon, Y. Ahmad
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2022
PubMed Central
od 2022
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2017
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been considered the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; however, many individuals are unable or unwilling to take long-term OAC. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been controversial, and new trial data have recently emerged. We therefore sought to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OAC to percutaneous LAAC, focusing on individual clinical endpoints. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 through December 2021 for all RCTs comparing percutaneous LAAC to OAC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Fixed and random effects meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) were performed using the longest follow-up duration available by intention-to-treat. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Three RCTs enrolling 1516 patients were identified. The weighted mean follow-up was 54.7 months. LAAC was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; p = 0.023), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.61; p = 0.003), and major nonprocedural bleeding (HR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LAAC and OAC for any other endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from RCTs suggests LAAC therapy is associated with reduced long-term risk of death compared with OAC. This may be driven by reductions in hemorrhagic stroke and major nonprocedural bleeding. There were no significant differences in the risk of all stroke. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York New York USA
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
Smidt Heart Institute Cedars Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA
The Helmsley Electrophysiology Center Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
Yale School of Medicine Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23010181
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230721095305.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230707s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100096 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37275318
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Madhavan, Mahesh V $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
- 245 10
- $a Long-Term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure to Oral Anticoagulation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis / $c MV. Madhavan, JP. Howard, MI. Brener, C. Der Nigoghossian, S. Chen, R. Makkar, P. Osmancik, VY. Reddy, DR. Holmes, GW. Stone, MB. Leon, Y. Ahmad
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been considered the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; however, many individuals are unable or unwilling to take long-term OAC. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been controversial, and new trial data have recently emerged. We therefore sought to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing OAC to percutaneous LAAC, focusing on individual clinical endpoints. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 through December 2021 for all RCTs comparing percutaneous LAAC to OAC in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Fixed and random effects meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) were performed using the longest follow-up duration available by intention-to-treat. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Three RCTs enrolling 1516 patients were identified. The weighted mean follow-up was 54.7 months. LAAC was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; p = 0.023), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.61; p = 0.003), and major nonprocedural bleeding (HR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between LAAC and OAC for any other endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from RCTs suggests LAAC therapy is associated with reduced long-term risk of death compared with OAC. This may be driven by reductions in hemorrhagic stroke and major nonprocedural bleeding. There were no significant differences in the risk of all stroke. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Howard, James P $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Brener, Michael I $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Der Nigoghossian, Caroline $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Shmuel $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Makkar, Raj $u Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Reddy, Vivek Y $u The Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA $u The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Holmes, David R $u Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Stone, Gregg W $u The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Leon, Martin B $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA $u Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Ahmad, Yousif $u Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00211269 $t Structural heart $x 2474-8714 $g Roč. 7, č. 1 (2023), s. 100096
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37275318 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230707 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230721095258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1958667 $s 1196445
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 7 $c 1 $d 100096 $e 20220924 $i 2474-8714 $m Structural heart $n Struct. heart $x MED00211269
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230707