• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Immersive Virtual Reality and Cadaveric Bone are Equally Effective in Skeletal Anatomy Education: A Randomized Crossover Noninferiority Trial

R. Koucheki, JR. Lex, A. Morozova, D. Ferri, TM. Hauer, S. Mirzaie, PC. Ferguson, B. Ballyk

. 2023 ; 80 (7) : 1028-1038. [pub] 20230505

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23010897

OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology is transforming medical education. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of IVR with cadaveric bone models in teaching skeletal anatomy. DESIGN: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial was conducted. SETTING: Anatomy laboratory of a large medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Incoming first-year medical students. Participants were randomized to IVR or cadaveric groups studying upper limb skeletal anatomy, and then were crossed over to use the opposite tool, to study lower limb skeletal anatomy. Participants in both groups completed a pre-and postintervention knowledge test. The primary endpoint of the study was change in performance from the pre-to postintervention knowledge test. Surveys were completed to assess participant's impressions on IVR as an educational tool. RESULTS: Fifty first-year medical students met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Among all students, the average score on the preintervention knowledge test was 14.6% (standard deviation (SD) = 18.2%) and 25.0% (SD = 17%) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Percentage increase in scores between pre-and postintervention knowledge test, was 15.0% in the upper limb IVR group, and 16.7% for upper limb cadaveric bones (p = 0.286). For the lower limb, score increase was 22.6% in the IVR and 22.5% in the cadaveric bone group (p = 0.936). 79% of participants found that IVR was most valuable for teaching 3-dimensional orientation, anatomical relationships, and key landmarks. Majority of participants were favorable towards combination use of traditional methods and IVR technology for learning skeletal anatomy (LSM>3). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference in knowledge after using IVR or cadaveric bones for skeletal anatomy education. These findings have further implications for medical schools that face challenges in acquiring human cadavers and cadaveric parts.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23010897
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132659.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.04.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37150701
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Koucheki, Robert $u Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Robert.koucheki@mail.utoronto.ca
245    10
$a Immersive Virtual Reality and Cadaveric Bone are Equally Effective in Skeletal Anatomy Education: A Randomized Crossover Noninferiority Trial / $c R. Koucheki, JR. Lex, A. Morozova, D. Ferri, TM. Hauer, S. Mirzaie, PC. Ferguson, B. Ballyk
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology is transforming medical education. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of IVR with cadaveric bone models in teaching skeletal anatomy. DESIGN: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial was conducted. SETTING: Anatomy laboratory of a large medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Incoming first-year medical students. Participants were randomized to IVR or cadaveric groups studying upper limb skeletal anatomy, and then were crossed over to use the opposite tool, to study lower limb skeletal anatomy. Participants in both groups completed a pre-and postintervention knowledge test. The primary endpoint of the study was change in performance from the pre-to postintervention knowledge test. Surveys were completed to assess participant's impressions on IVR as an educational tool. RESULTS: Fifty first-year medical students met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Among all students, the average score on the preintervention knowledge test was 14.6% (standard deviation (SD) = 18.2%) and 25.0% (SD = 17%) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Percentage increase in scores between pre-and postintervention knowledge test, was 15.0% in the upper limb IVR group, and 16.7% for upper limb cadaveric bones (p = 0.286). For the lower limb, score increase was 22.6% in the IVR and 22.5% in the cadaveric bone group (p = 0.936). 79% of participants found that IVR was most valuable for teaching 3-dimensional orientation, anatomical relationships, and key landmarks. Majority of participants were favorable towards combination use of traditional methods and IVR technology for learning skeletal anatomy (LSM>3). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference in knowledge after using IVR or cadaveric bones for skeletal anatomy education. These findings have further implications for medical schools that face challenges in acquiring human cadavers and cadaveric parts.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a virtuální realita $7 D000076142
650    _2
$a učení $7 D007858
650    12
$a studenti lékařství $7 D013337
650    12
$a studium lékařství $x metody $7 D004501
650    _2
$a mrtvola $7 D002102
650    12
$a anatomie $x výchova $7 D000715
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lex, Johnathan R $u Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Morozova, Alexandra $u Division of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anatomy, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Ferri, Dario $u Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Hauer, Tyler M $u Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Mirzaie, Sarah $u David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
700    1_
$a Ferguson, Peter C $u Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Ballyk, Barbara $u Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00158969 $t Journal of surgical education $x 1878-7452 $g Roč. 80, č. 7 (2023), s. 1028-1038
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37150701 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132656 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963358 $s 1197162
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 80 $c 7 $d 1028-1038 $e 20230505 $i 1878-7452 $m Journal of surgical education $n J Surg Educ $x MED00158969
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace