-
Something wrong with this record ?
Combination of Urinary MiR-501 and MiR-335 With Current Clinical Diagnostic Parameters as Potential Predictive Factors of Prostate Biopsy Outcome
J. Juracek, M. Madrzyk, K. Trachtova, M. Ruckova, J. Bohosova, DA. Barth, M. Pichler, M. Stanik, O. Slaby
Language English Country Greece
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004 to 2 years ago
PubMed Central
from 2016
Europe PubMed Central
from 2016
PubMed
37093688
DOI
10.21873/cgp.20383
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biopsy MeSH
- Prostatic Hyperplasia * genetics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- MicroRNAs * genetics MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Prostatic Neoplasms * genetics MeSH
- Prostate pathology MeSH
- Prostate-Specific Antigen MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: The detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) quantification as an initial screening followed by ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy. However, the high rate of false-negative biopsies often leads to inappropriate treatment. Therefore, new molecular biomarkers, such as urine microRNAs (miRNAs), are a possible way to redefine PCa diagnostics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urine samples of 356 patients undergoing prostate biopsy (256 cases with confirmed prostate cancer, 100 cases with negative prostate biopsy) at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (Czech Republic) and additional 36 control subjects (healthy controls, benign prostatic hyperplasia - BPH) were divided into the discovery and validation cohorts and analyzed. In the discovery phase, small RNA sequencing was performed using the QIAseq miRNA Library Kit and the NextSeq 500 platform. Identified miRNA candidates were validated by the RT-qPCR method in the independent validation phase. RESULTS: Using the small RNA sequencing method, we identified 12 urine miRNAs significantly dysregulated between PCa patients and controls. Furthermore, independent validation showed the ability of miR-501-3p and the quantitative miR-335:miR-501 ratio to distinguish between PCa patients and patients with negative prostate biopsy. The subsequent combination of the miR-335:miR-501 ratio with PSA and total prostate volume (TPV) using logistic regression exceeded the analytical accuracy of standalone parameters [area under curve (AUC)=0.75, positive predictive value (PPV)=0.85, negative predictive value (NPV)=0.51)] and discriminated patients according to biopsy outcome. CONCLUSION: Combination of miR-335:miR-501 ratio with PSA and total prostate volume was able to identify patients with negative prostate biopsy and could potentially streamline decision making for biopsy indication.
Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Biology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011532
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801133121.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21873/cgp.20383 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37093688
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Juracek, Jaroslav $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Combination of Urinary MiR-501 and MiR-335 With Current Clinical Diagnostic Parameters as Potential Predictive Factors of Prostate Biopsy Outcome / $c J. Juracek, M. Madrzyk, K. Trachtova, M. Ruckova, J. Bohosova, DA. Barth, M. Pichler, M. Stanik, O. Slaby
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) quantification as an initial screening followed by ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy. However, the high rate of false-negative biopsies often leads to inappropriate treatment. Therefore, new molecular biomarkers, such as urine microRNAs (miRNAs), are a possible way to redefine PCa diagnostics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urine samples of 356 patients undergoing prostate biopsy (256 cases with confirmed prostate cancer, 100 cases with negative prostate biopsy) at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (Czech Republic) and additional 36 control subjects (healthy controls, benign prostatic hyperplasia - BPH) were divided into the discovery and validation cohorts and analyzed. In the discovery phase, small RNA sequencing was performed using the QIAseq miRNA Library Kit and the NextSeq 500 platform. Identified miRNA candidates were validated by the RT-qPCR method in the independent validation phase. RESULTS: Using the small RNA sequencing method, we identified 12 urine miRNAs significantly dysregulated between PCa patients and controls. Furthermore, independent validation showed the ability of miR-501-3p and the quantitative miR-335:miR-501 ratio to distinguish between PCa patients and patients with negative prostate biopsy. The subsequent combination of the miR-335:miR-501 ratio with PSA and total prostate volume (TPV) using logistic regression exceeded the analytical accuracy of standalone parameters [area under curve (AUC)=0.75, positive predictive value (PPV)=0.85, negative predictive value (NPV)=0.51)] and discriminated patients according to biopsy outcome. CONCLUSION: Combination of miR-335:miR-501 ratio with PSA and total prostate volume was able to identify patients with negative prostate biopsy and could potentially streamline decision making for biopsy indication.
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a prostata $x patologie $7 D011467
- 650 _2
- $a prostatický specifický antigen $7 D017430
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $7 D014408
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty $x genetika $7 D011471
- 650 12
- $a mikro RNA $x genetika $7 D035683
- 650 12
- $a hyperplazie prostaty $x genetika $7 D011470
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $7 D001706
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Madrzyk, Marie $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Trachtova, Karolina $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ruckova, Michaela $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bohosova, Julia $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Barth, Dominik A $u Research Unit of Non-Coding RNAs and Genome Editing in Cancer, Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Pichler, Martin $u Research Unit of Non-Coding RNAs and Genome Editing in Cancer, Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Stanik, Michal $u Department of Urologic Oncology, Clinic of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; stanik@mou.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Slaby, Ondrej $u Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; ondrej.slaby@ceitec.muni.cz $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180194 $t Cancer genomics & proteomics $x 1790-6245 $g Roč. 20, č. 3 (2023), s. 308-316
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37093688 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801133117 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963759 $s 1197797
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 20 $c 3 $d 308-316 $e - $i 1790-6245 $m Cancer genomics & proteomics $n Cancer Genomics Proteomics $x MED00180194
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718