• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effects of Neuroanatomic Structural Distances on Pituitary Function After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Study

N. Ironside, CJ. Chen, Z. Xu, D. Schlesinger, M. Lee Vance, GK. Hong, JA. Jane, S. Patel, SK. Bindal, A. Niranjan, LD. Lunsford, R. Liscak, T. Chytka, J. Jezkova, O. Saifi, DM. Trifiletti, A. Berger, J. Alzate, K. Bernstein, D. Kondziolka, H....

. 2023 ; 92 (5) : 1035-1042. [pub] 20230117

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23011621

BACKGROUND: Delayed hypopituitarism is the most common complication after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between neuroanatomic structure distances from the radiation target and anterior pituitary function preservation after SRS through multicenter study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database from January 2002 to December 2021 for adult patients undergoing SRS for pituitary adenomas with >6 months of follow-up. Distances between centers or edges of hypothalamic-pituitary axis structures and SRS target volumes were measured using MRI. The primary outcome was anterior pituitary function preservation. Predictors were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven patients were categorized by preservation (n = 384) and no preservation (n = 103) of anterior pituitary function. The mean margin dose was 19.1(6.2) Gy. Larger distance from the center of the stalk to the tumor margin isodose was a positive predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.162 [1.046-1.291], P = .005), while pre-SRS hypopituitarism (aOR = 0.646 [0.405-1.031], P = .067) and larger treatment volume (aOR = 0.965 [0.929-1.002], P = .061) were near negative predictors of the primary outcome. An interaction between the treatment volume and center stalk to margin isodose distance was found (aOR = 0.980 [0.961-0.999], P = .045). Center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.620 (0.557-0.693), at 3.95-mm distance. For patients with treatment volumes of <2.34 mL, center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.719 (0.614-0.823), at 2.95-mm distance. CONCLUSION: Achieving a distance between the center of the pituitary stalk and the tumor margin isodose ≥3.95 mm predicted anterior pituitary function preservation. For smaller treatment volumes <2.34 mL, the optimal distance was ≥2.95 mm. This may be modifiable during trans-sphenoidal resection to preserve pituitary function.

3rd Department of Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Endocrinology Centre de Recherche du CHUS Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada

Department of Neurological Surgery University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurological Surgery University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny Health Network Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurosurgery Centre de Recherche du CHUS Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada

Department of Neurosurgery Koç University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey

Department of Neurosurgery NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA

Department of Neurosurgery Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurosurgery The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston Texas USA

Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA

Department of Radiation Oncology NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA

Department of Radiation Oncology University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Division of Radiation Oncology Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Division of Radiation Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Radiology Department Dominican Gamma Knife Center CEDIMAT Santo Domingo Dominican Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011621
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801133211.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1227/neu.0000000000002347 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36700741
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ironside, Natasha $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000293901574
245    10
$a Effects of Neuroanatomic Structural Distances on Pituitary Function After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Study / $c N. Ironside, CJ. Chen, Z. Xu, D. Schlesinger, M. Lee Vance, GK. Hong, JA. Jane, S. Patel, SK. Bindal, A. Niranjan, LD. Lunsford, R. Liscak, T. Chytka, J. Jezkova, O. Saifi, DM. Trifiletti, A. Berger, J. Alzate, K. Bernstein, D. Kondziolka, H. Speckter, W. Hernandez, E. Lazo, S. Peker, Y. Samanci, BE. Zacharia, C. Mau, RE. Wegner, MJ. Shepard, D. Mathieu, M. Maillet, JP. Sheehan
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Delayed hypopituitarism is the most common complication after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between neuroanatomic structure distances from the radiation target and anterior pituitary function preservation after SRS through multicenter study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database from January 2002 to December 2021 for adult patients undergoing SRS for pituitary adenomas with >6 months of follow-up. Distances between centers or edges of hypothalamic-pituitary axis structures and SRS target volumes were measured using MRI. The primary outcome was anterior pituitary function preservation. Predictors were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven patients were categorized by preservation (n = 384) and no preservation (n = 103) of anterior pituitary function. The mean margin dose was 19.1(6.2) Gy. Larger distance from the center of the stalk to the tumor margin isodose was a positive predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.162 [1.046-1.291], P = .005), while pre-SRS hypopituitarism (aOR = 0.646 [0.405-1.031], P = .067) and larger treatment volume (aOR = 0.965 [0.929-1.002], P = .061) were near negative predictors of the primary outcome. An interaction between the treatment volume and center stalk to margin isodose distance was found (aOR = 0.980 [0.961-0.999], P = .045). Center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.620 (0.557-0.693), at 3.95-mm distance. For patients with treatment volumes of <2.34 mL, center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.719 (0.614-0.823), at 2.95-mm distance. CONCLUSION: Achieving a distance between the center of the pituitary stalk and the tumor margin isodose ≥3.95 mm predicted anterior pituitary function preservation. For smaller treatment volumes <2.34 mL, the optimal distance was ≥2.95 mm. This may be modifiable during trans-sphenoidal resection to preserve pituitary function.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a nádory hypofýzy $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $x komplikace $7 D010911
650    12
$a radiochirurgie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016634
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a hypopituitarismus $x etiologie $7 D007018
650    _2
$a hypofýza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D010902
650    12
$a adenom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D000236
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Chen, Ching-Jen $u Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
700    1_
$a Xu, Zhiyuan $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
700    1_
$a Schlesinger, David $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
700    1_
$a Lee Vance, Mary $u Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
700    1_
$a Hong, Gregory K $u Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
700    1_
$a Jane, John A $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
700    1_
$a Patel, Samir $u Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Bindal, Shray K $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Niranjan, Ajay $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Lunsford, L Dade $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Liscak, Roman $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chytka, Thomas $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jezkova, Jana $u 3rd Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Saifi, Omran $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
700    1_
$a Trifiletti, Daniel M $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
700    1_
$a Berger, Assaf $u Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Alzate, Juan $u Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Bernstein, Kenneth $u Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Kondziolka, Douglas $u Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Speckter, Herwin $u Radiology Department, Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
700    1_
$a Hernandez, Wenceslao $u Radiology Department, Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
700    1_
$a Lazo, Erwin $u Radiology Department, Dominican Gamma Knife Center, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
700    1_
$a Peker, Selcuk $u Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Samanci, Yavuz $u Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Zacharia, Brad E $u Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Mau, Christine $u Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health-Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Wegner, Rodney E $u Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Shepard, Matthew J $u Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, , USA
700    1_
$a Mathieu, David $u Department of Neurosurgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
700    1_
$a Maillet, Michel $u Department of Endocrinology, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
700    1_
$a Sheehan, Jason P $u Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
773    0_
$w MED00003511 $t Neurosurgery $x 1524-4040 $g Roč. 92, č. 5 (2023), s. 1035-1042
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36700741 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801133207 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963825 $s 1197886
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 92 $c 5 $d 1035-1042 $e 20230117 $i 1524-4040 $m Neurosurgery $n Neurosurgery $x MED00003511
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...