• This record comes from PubMed

Effects of Neuroanatomic Structural Distances on Pituitary Function After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Study

. 2023 May 01 ; 92 (5) : 1035-1042. [epub] 20230117

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Multicenter Study, Journal Article

Links

PubMed 36700741
DOI 10.1227/neu.0000000000002347
PII: 00006123-202305000-00017
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: Delayed hypopituitarism is the most common complication after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between neuroanatomic structure distances from the radiation target and anterior pituitary function preservation after SRS through multicenter study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database from January 2002 to December 2021 for adult patients undergoing SRS for pituitary adenomas with >6 months of follow-up. Distances between centers or edges of hypothalamic-pituitary axis structures and SRS target volumes were measured using MRI. The primary outcome was anterior pituitary function preservation. Predictors were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven patients were categorized by preservation (n = 384) and no preservation (n = 103) of anterior pituitary function. The mean margin dose was 19.1(6.2) Gy. Larger distance from the center of the stalk to the tumor margin isodose was a positive predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.162 [1.046-1.291], P = .005), while pre-SRS hypopituitarism (aOR = 0.646 [0.405-1.031], P = .067) and larger treatment volume (aOR = 0.965 [0.929-1.002], P = .061) were near negative predictors of the primary outcome. An interaction between the treatment volume and center stalk to margin isodose distance was found (aOR = 0.980 [0.961-0.999], P = .045). Center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.620 (0.557-0.693), at 3.95-mm distance. For patients with treatment volumes of <2.34 mL, center stalk to margin isodose distance had an AUROC of 0.719 (0.614-0.823), at 2.95-mm distance. CONCLUSION: Achieving a distance between the center of the pituitary stalk and the tumor margin isodose ≥3.95 mm predicted anterior pituitary function preservation. For smaller treatment volumes <2.34 mL, the optimal distance was ≥2.95 mm. This may be modifiable during trans-sphenoidal resection to preserve pituitary function.

3rd Department of Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Endocrinology Centre de Recherche du CHUS Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada

Department of Neurological Surgery University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurological Surgery University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny Health Network Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurosurgery Centre de Recherche du CHUS Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada

Department of Neurosurgery Koç University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey

Department of Neurosurgery NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA

Department of Neurosurgery Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USA

Department of Neurosurgery The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston Texas USA

Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA

Department of Radiation Oncology NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA

Department of Radiation Oncology University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Division of Radiation Oncology Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Division of Radiation Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Radiology Department Dominican Gamma Knife Center CEDIMAT Santo Domingo Dominican Republic

See more in PubMed

Ding D, Starke RM, Sheehan JP. Treatment paradigms for pituitary adenomas: defining the roles of radiosurgery and radiation therapy. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;117(3):445-457.

Jagannathan J, Yen CP, Pouratian N, Laws ER, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a comprehensive review of indications, techniques and long-term results using the Gamma Knife. J Neuro-Oncol. 2009;92(3):345-356.

Laws ER, Sheehan JP, Sheehan JM, Jagnathan J, Jane Jr JA, Oskouian R. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2004;69(1-3):257-272.

Castro DG, Cecílio SA, Canteras MM. Radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: evaluation of its efficacy and safety. Radiat Oncol. 2010;175(1):109.

Zhang L, Chen W, Ding C, et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery as the initial treatment for elderly patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol. 2021;152(2):257-264.

Yu J, Li Y, Quan T, et al. Initial Gamma Knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: results from a 26-year experience. Endocrine. 2020;68(2):399-410.

Deng Y, Li Y, Li X, et al. Long-term results of gamma knife radiosurgery for postsurgical residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(11):1532-1540.

Sheehan J, Lee CC, Bodach ME, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guideline for the management of patients with residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(4):E539-E540.

Pomeraniec IJ, Taylor DG, Cohen-Inbar O, Xu Z, Lee Vance M, Sheehan JP. Radiation dose to neuroanatomical structures of pituitary adenomas and the effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery on pituitary function. J Neurosurg. 2020;132(5):1499-1506.

Xu Z, Lee Vance M, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP. Hypopituitarism after stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(4):630636-630677.

Zibar Tomšić K, Dušek T, Kraljević I, et al. Hypopituitarism after gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma. Endocr Res. 2017;42(4):318-324.

Cordeiro D, Xu Z, Mehta GU, et al. Hypopituitarism after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a multicenter, international study. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(4):1188-1196.

Kotecha R, Sahgal A, Rubens M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for non-functioning pituitary adenomas: meta-analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice opinion. Neuro-Oncology. 2020;22(3):318-332.

Ehrnborg C, Hakkaart-Van Roijen L, Jonsson B, Rutten FF, Bengtsson BA, Rosén T. Cost of illness in adult patients with hypopituitarism. PharmacoEconomics. 2000;17(6):621-628.

Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, et al. Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. Lancet. 2001;357(9254):425-431.

Ironside NSH, Snyder H, Xu Z, et al. Effect of distance from target on hypopituitarism after stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. J Neuro-Oncol/ 2022;158(1):41-50.

Pomeraniec IJ, Xu Z, Lee CC, et al. Dose to neuroanatomical structures surrounding pituitary adenomas and the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery on neuroendocrine function: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 2022;136(3):813-821.

Gopalan R, Schlesinger D, Vance ML, Laws E, Sheehan J. Long-term outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for patients with a nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(2):284-293.

Taussky P, Kalra R, Coppens J, Mohebali J, Jensen R, Couldwell WT. Endocrinological outcome after pituitary transposition (hypophysopexy) and adjuvant radiotherapy for tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(1):55-62.

Feigl GC, Bonelli CM, Berghold A, Mokry M. Effects of gamma knife radiosurgery of pituitary adenomas on pituitary function. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(5 suppl):415-421.

Feigl GC, Pistracher K, Berghold A, Mokry M. Pituitary insufficiency as a side effect after radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: the role of the hypothalamus. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(special_supplement):153-159.

Oh JW, Sung KS, Moon JH, et al. Hypopituitarism after Gamma Knife surgery for postoperative nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(suppl 1):47-54.

Sicignano G, Losa M, del Vecchio A, et al. Dosimetric factors associated with pituitary function after Gamma Knife Surgery (GKS) of pituitary adenomas. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104(1):119-124.

Trifiletti DM, Xu Z, Dutta SW, et al. Endocrine remission after pituitary stereotactic radiosurgery: differences in rates of response for matched cohorts of cushing disease and acromegaly patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101(3):610-617.

Pekic S, Miljic D, Popovic V. Hypopituitarism following cranial radiotherapy. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.

Hwang JY, Aum DJ, Chicoine MR, et al. Axis-specific analysis and predictors of endocrine recovery and deficits for non-functioning pituitary adenomas undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary. 2020;23(4):389-399.

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...