Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Current animal models of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review

S. Ijuin, K. Liu, D. Gill, S. Kyun Ro, J. Vukovic, S. Ishihara, J. Belohlavek, G. Li Bassi, JY. Suen, JF. Fraser

. 2023 ; 15 (-) : 100426. [pub] 20230714

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23015360

AIM: Animal models of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) focusing on neurological outcomes are required to further the development of this potentially life-saving technology. The aim of this review is to summarize current animal models of ECPR. METHODS: A comprehensive database search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was undertaken. Full-text publications describing animal models of ECPR between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, were identified and included in the review. Data describing the conduct of the animal models of ECPR, measured variables, and outcomes were extracted according to pre-defined definitions. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 805 unique reports of which 37 studies were included in the final analysis. Most studies (95%) described using a pig model of ECPR with the remainder (5%) describing a rat model. The most common method for induction of cardiac arrest was a fatal ventricular arrhythmia through electrical stimulation (70%). 10 studies reported neurological assessment of animals using physical examination, serum biomarkers, or electrophysiological findings, however, only two studies described a multimodal assessment. No studies reported the use of brain imaging as part of the neurological assessment. Return of spontaneous circulation was the most reported primary outcome, and no studies described the neurological status of the animal as the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Current animal models of ECPR do not describe clinically relevant neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. Further work is needed to develop models that more accurately mimic clinical scenarios and can test innovations that can be translated to the application of ECPR in clinical medicine.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015360
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093641.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100426 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37519410
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Ijuin, Shinichi $u Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
245    10
$a Current animal models of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping review / $c S. Ijuin, K. Liu, D. Gill, S. Kyun Ro, J. Vukovic, S. Ishihara, J. Belohlavek, G. Li Bassi, JY. Suen, JF. Fraser
520    9_
$a AIM: Animal models of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) focusing on neurological outcomes are required to further the development of this potentially life-saving technology. The aim of this review is to summarize current animal models of ECPR. METHODS: A comprehensive database search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was undertaken. Full-text publications describing animal models of ECPR between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, were identified and included in the review. Data describing the conduct of the animal models of ECPR, measured variables, and outcomes were extracted according to pre-defined definitions. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 805 unique reports of which 37 studies were included in the final analysis. Most studies (95%) described using a pig model of ECPR with the remainder (5%) describing a rat model. The most common method for induction of cardiac arrest was a fatal ventricular arrhythmia through electrical stimulation (70%). 10 studies reported neurological assessment of animals using physical examination, serum biomarkers, or electrophysiological findings, however, only two studies described a multimodal assessment. No studies reported the use of brain imaging as part of the neurological assessment. Return of spontaneous circulation was the most reported primary outcome, and no studies described the neurological status of the animal as the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Current animal models of ECPR do not describe clinically relevant neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. Further work is needed to develop models that more accurately mimic clinical scenarios and can test innovations that can be translated to the application of ECPR in clinical medicine.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Liu, Keibun $u Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
700    1_
$a Gill, Denzil $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
700    1_
$a Kyun Ro, Sun $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Kobe, Japan $u Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
700    1_
$a Vukovic, Jana $u School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
700    1_
$a Ishihara, Satoshi $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Emergency Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
700    1_
$a Belohlavek, Jan $u Second Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical School, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Li Bassi, Gianluigi $u Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
700    1_
$a Suen, Jacky Y $u Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
700    1_
$a Fraser, John F $u Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia $u Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia $u Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia $u St. Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
773    0_
$w MED00209367 $t Resuscitation plus $x 2666-5204 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2023), s. 100426
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37519410 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093635 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997111 $s 1201722
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 15 $c - $d 100426 $e 20230714 $i 2666-5204 $m Resuscitation plus $n Resusc Plus $x MED00209367
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace