Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Biased Quantification of Rat Liver Fibrosis-Meta-Analysis with Practical Recommendations and Clinical Implications

P. Mik, K. Barannikava, P. Surkova

. 2023 ; 12 (15) : . [pub] 20230801

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 Charles University
UNCE/MED/006 Charles University

For liver fibrosis assessment, the liver biopsy is usually stained with Masson's trichrome (MT) or picrosirius red (PSR) to quantify liver connective tissue (LCT) for fibrosis scoring. However, several concerns of such semiquantitative assessments have been raised, and when searching for data on the amount of LCT in healthy rats, the results vastly differ. Regarding the ongoing reproducibility crisis in science, it is necessary to inspect the results and methods, and to design an unbiased and reproducible method of LCT assessment. We searched the Medline database using search terms related to liver fibrosis, LCT and collagen, rat strains, and staining methods. Our search identified 74 eligible rat groups in 57 studies. We found up to 170-fold differences in the amount of LCT among healthy Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats, with significant differences even within individual studies. Biased sampling and quantification probably caused the observed differences. In addition, we also found incorrect handling of liver fibrosis scoring. Assessment of LCT using stereological sampling methods (such as systematic uniform sampling) would provide us with unbiased data. Such data could eventually be used not only for the objective assessment of liver fibrosis but also for validation of noninvasive methods of the assessment of early stages of liver fibrosis.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015553
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093551.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/jcm12155072 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37568474
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Mik, Patrik $u Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Center and Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000019780650X $7 xx0224986
245    10
$a Biased Quantification of Rat Liver Fibrosis-Meta-Analysis with Practical Recommendations and Clinical Implications / $c P. Mik, K. Barannikava, P. Surkova
520    9_
$a For liver fibrosis assessment, the liver biopsy is usually stained with Masson's trichrome (MT) or picrosirius red (PSR) to quantify liver connective tissue (LCT) for fibrosis scoring. However, several concerns of such semiquantitative assessments have been raised, and when searching for data on the amount of LCT in healthy rats, the results vastly differ. Regarding the ongoing reproducibility crisis in science, it is necessary to inspect the results and methods, and to design an unbiased and reproducible method of LCT assessment. We searched the Medline database using search terms related to liver fibrosis, LCT and collagen, rat strains, and staining methods. Our search identified 74 eligible rat groups in 57 studies. We found up to 170-fold differences in the amount of LCT among healthy Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats, with significant differences even within individual studies. Biased sampling and quantification probably caused the observed differences. In addition, we also found incorrect handling of liver fibrosis scoring. Assessment of LCT using stereological sampling methods (such as systematic uniform sampling) would provide us with unbiased data. Such data could eventually be used not only for the objective assessment of liver fibrosis but also for validation of noninvasive methods of the assessment of early stages of liver fibrosis.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Barannikava, Katsiaryna $u Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Surkova, Polina $u Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 12, č. 15 (2023)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37568474 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093544 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997182 $s 1201915
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 12 $c 15 $e 20230801 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 $p Charles University
GRA    __
$a UNCE/MED/006 $p Charles University
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...