Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Impact of performance status on efficacy of systemic therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

T. Yanagisawa, T. Kawada, K. Mori, SR. Shim, H. Mostafaei, R. Sari Motlagh, F. Quhal, E. Laukhtina, M. von Deimling, A. Bianchi, M. Majdoub, M. Pallauf, B. Pradere, T. Kimura, SF. Shariat, P. Rajwa

. 2023 ; 132 (4) : 365-379. [pub] 20230703

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa. METHODS: Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%-28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS: Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages.

Department of Biomedical Informatics College of Medicine Konyang University Daejeon Korea

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany

Department of Urology Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg University Hospital Salzburg Salzburg Austria

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

Department of Urology University of Verona Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona Italy

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016138
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026110325.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/bju.16106 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37395151
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Yanagisawa, Takafumi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000274100712
245    10
$a Impact of performance status on efficacy of systemic therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis / $c T. Yanagisawa, T. Kawada, K. Mori, SR. Shim, H. Mostafaei, R. Sari Motlagh, F. Quhal, E. Laukhtina, M. von Deimling, A. Bianchi, M. Majdoub, M. Pallauf, B. Pradere, T. Kimura, SF. Shariat, P. Rajwa
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa. METHODS: Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%-28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS: Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a nádory prostaty $x patologie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a docetaxel $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077143
650    _2
$a antagonisté androgenů $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000726
650    _2
$a doba přežití bez progrese choroby $7 D000077982
650    12
$a nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci $x farmakoterapie $7 D064129
650    _2
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kawada, Tatsushi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000283699712
700    1_
$a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000261476569
700    1_
$a Shim, Sung Ryul $u Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
700    1_
$a Mostafaei, Hadi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran $1 https://orcid.org/0000000155961771
700    1_
$a Sari Motlagh, Reza $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran $1 https://orcid.org/0000000238199911
700    1_
$a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
700    1_
$a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289530272
700    1_
$a von Deimling, Markus $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Bianchi, Alberto $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
700    1_
$a Majdoub, Muhammad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
700    1_
$a Pallauf, Maximilian $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284964506
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
700    1_
$a Kimura, Takahiro $u Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340736584
773    0_
$w MED00011371 $t BJU international $x 1464-410X $g Roč. 132, č. 4 (2023), s. 365-379
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37395151 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026110319 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1999952 $s 1202500
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 132 $c 4 $d 365-379 $e 20230703 $i 1464-410X $m BJU international $n BJU Int $x MED00011371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...