• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies

P. Sonneveld, PG. Richardson, H. Ludwig, MA. Dimopoulos, FH. Schjesvold, R. Hájek, H. Abdulhaq, M. Thuresson, S. Norin, NA. Bakker, MV. Mateos

. 2023 ; 23 (9) : 687-696. [pub] 20230506

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016391

INTRODUCTION: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) but directionally different overall survival (OS) favoring pomalidomide (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10) in OCEAN. METHODS: These analyses further investigated prognostic subgroups impacting survival in updated data from the randomized, phase 3 OCEAN study (NCT03151811; date: February 3, 2022) and the phase 2 HORIZON study (NCT02963493; date: February 2, 2022). RESULTS: In OCEAN, subgroups prognostic for OS were age (P = .011; <65 years favored pomalidomide) and no previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or progression >36 months after ASCT (P = .001; favored melflufen). Overall, 245 of 495 (49%) patients randomized had received a previous ASCT, of which 202 (82%) had progressed within 36 months following their ASCT. When excluding patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (melflufen group, n = 145; pomalidomide group, n = 148), median OS was 23.6 months with melflufen and 19.8 months with pomalidomide (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62-1.12]; P = .22). Among patients with triple-class refractory disease in HORIZON, patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (n = 58) had a lower response rate and shorter duration of response and PFS than the remaining patients (n = 52). Safety was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate a consistent benefit for melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have not received an ASCT or progressed >36 months after receiving an ASCT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03151811).

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016391
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105931.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.clml.2023.05.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37355418
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sonneveld, Pieter $u Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.sonneveld@erasmusmc.nl
245    10
$a Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies / $c P. Sonneveld, PG. Richardson, H. Ludwig, MA. Dimopoulos, FH. Schjesvold, R. Hájek, H. Abdulhaq, M. Thuresson, S. Norin, NA. Bakker, MV. Mateos
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) but directionally different overall survival (OS) favoring pomalidomide (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10) in OCEAN. METHODS: These analyses further investigated prognostic subgroups impacting survival in updated data from the randomized, phase 3 OCEAN study (NCT03151811; date: February 3, 2022) and the phase 2 HORIZON study (NCT02963493; date: February 2, 2022). RESULTS: In OCEAN, subgroups prognostic for OS were age (P = .011; <65 years favored pomalidomide) and no previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or progression >36 months after ASCT (P = .001; favored melflufen). Overall, 245 of 495 (49%) patients randomized had received a previous ASCT, of which 202 (82%) had progressed within 36 months following their ASCT. When excluding patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (melflufen group, n = 145; pomalidomide group, n = 148), median OS was 23.6 months with melflufen and 19.8 months with pomalidomide (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62-1.12]; P = .22). Among patients with triple-class refractory disease in HORIZON, patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (n = 58) had a lower response rate and shorter duration of response and PFS than the remaining patients (n = 52). Safety was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate a consistent benefit for melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have not received an ASCT or progressed >36 months after receiving an ASCT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03151811).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000971
650    _2
$a dexamethason $x terapeutické užití $7 D003907
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a melfalan $x terapeutické užití $7 D008558
650    12
$a mnohočetný myelom $x farmakoterapie $7 D009101
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a autologní transplantace $7 D014182
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II jako téma $7 D017322
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III jako téma $7 D017326
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Richardson, Paul G $u Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
700    1_
$a Ludwig, Heinz $u Medical Department Center for Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Medicine, Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanasios $u Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
700    1_
$a Schjesvold, Fredrik H $u Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
700    1_
$a Hájek, Roman $u Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Abdulhaq, Haifaa $u Department of Hemato-oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno Campus, CA
700    1_
$a Thuresson, Marcus $u Oncopeptides AB, Stockholm, Sweden
700    1_
$a Norin, Stefan $u Oncopeptides AB, Stockholm, Sweden
700    1_
$a Bakker, Nicolaas A $u Oncopeptides AB, Stockholm, Sweden
700    1_
$a Mateos, Maria-Victoria $u University Hospital of Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Institute of Cancer Molecular and Cellular Biology and CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
773    0_
$w MED00180199 $t Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia $x 2152-2669 $g Roč. 23, č. 9 (2023), s. 687-696
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37355418 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105925 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000105 $s 1202753
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 23 $c 9 $d 687-696 $e 20230506 $i 2152-2669 $m Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia $n Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk $x MED00180199
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...