Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Performance of clinical risk scores and prediction models to identify pathogenic germline variants in patients with advanced prostate cancer

K. Rebhan, PD. Stelzer, B. Pradere, P. Rajwa, G. Kramer, B. Hofmann, I. Resch, O. Yurdakul, FA. Laccone, MG. Bujalkova, M. Smogavec, YY. Tan, R. Ristl, SF. Shariat, G. Egger, MR. Hassler

. 2023 ; 41 (8) : 2091-2097. [pub] 20230801

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016645

Grantová podpora
FA743A0601 Austrian society for Urology and Andrology

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: Determining the frequency and distribution of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in Austrian prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess the accuracy of different clinical risk scores to correctly predict PGVs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 313 men with advanced PCa. A comprehensive personal and family history was obtained based on predefined questionnaires. Germline DNA sequencing was performed between 2019 and 2021 irrespective of family history, metastatic or castration status or age at diagnosis. Clinical risk scores for hereditary cancer syndromes were evaluated and a PCa-specific score was developed to assess the presence of PGVs. RESULTS: PGV presence was associated with metastasis (p = 0.047) and castration resistance (p = 0.011), but not with personal cancer history or with relatives with any type of cancer. Clinical risk scores (Manchester score, PREMM5 score, Amsterdam II criteria or Johns Hopkins criteria) showed low sensitivities (3.3-20%) for assessing the probability of PGV presence. A score specifically designed for PCa patients stratifying patients into low- or high-risk regarding PGV probability, correctly classified all PGV carriers as high-risk, whereas a third of PCa patients without PGVs was classified as low risk of the presence of PGVs. CONCLUSION: Application of common clinical risk scores based on family history are not suitable to identify PCa patients with high PGV probabilities. A PCa-specific score stratified PCa patients into low- or high-risk of PGV presence with sufficient accuracy, and germline DNA sequencing may be omitted in patients with a low score. Further studies are needed to evaluate the score.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016645
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105644.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-023-04535-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37528288
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Rebhan, Katharina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Departments of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
245    10
$a Performance of clinical risk scores and prediction models to identify pathogenic germline variants in patients with advanced prostate cancer / $c K. Rebhan, PD. Stelzer, B. Pradere, P. Rajwa, G. Kramer, B. Hofmann, I. Resch, O. Yurdakul, FA. Laccone, MG. Bujalkova, M. Smogavec, YY. Tan, R. Ristl, SF. Shariat, G. Egger, MR. Hassler
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Determining the frequency and distribution of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in Austrian prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess the accuracy of different clinical risk scores to correctly predict PGVs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 313 men with advanced PCa. A comprehensive personal and family history was obtained based on predefined questionnaires. Germline DNA sequencing was performed between 2019 and 2021 irrespective of family history, metastatic or castration status or age at diagnosis. Clinical risk scores for hereditary cancer syndromes were evaluated and a PCa-specific score was developed to assess the presence of PGVs. RESULTS: PGV presence was associated with metastasis (p = 0.047) and castration resistance (p = 0.011), but not with personal cancer history or with relatives with any type of cancer. Clinical risk scores (Manchester score, PREMM5 score, Amsterdam II criteria or Johns Hopkins criteria) showed low sensitivities (3.3-20%) for assessing the probability of PGV presence. A score specifically designed for PCa patients stratifying patients into low- or high-risk regarding PGV probability, correctly classified all PGV carriers as high-risk, whereas a third of PCa patients without PGVs was classified as low risk of the presence of PGVs. CONCLUSION: Application of common clinical risk scores based on family history are not suitable to identify PCa patients with high PGV probabilities. A PCa-specific score stratified PCa patients into low- or high-risk of PGV presence with sufficient accuracy, and germline DNA sequencing may be omitted in patients with a low score. Further studies are needed to evaluate the score.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a nádory prostaty $x genetika $x patologie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a zárodečné buňky $x patologie $7 D005854
650    _2
$a genetická predispozice k nemoci $7 D020022
651    _2
$a Rakousko $7 D001317
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Stelzer, Philipp D $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
700    1_
$a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
700    1_
$a Kramer, Gero $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Hofmann, Bernd $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Resch, Irene $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Yurdakul, Ozan $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Laccone, Franco A $u Institute of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Bujalkova, Maria Gerykova $u Institute of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Smogavec, Mateja $u Institute of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Tan, Yen Y $u Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Ristl, Robin $u Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Egger, Gerda $u Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria $u Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Hassler, Melanie R $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. melanie.hassler-difratta@meduniwien.ac.at $1 https://orcid.org/0000000294964411
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 41, č. 8 (2023), s. 2091-2097
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37528288 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105638 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000267 $s 1203007
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 41 $c 8 $d 2091-2097 $e 20230801 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
GRA    __
$a FA743A0601 $p Austrian society for Urology and Andrology
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...