• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison Between Dimethyl Fumarate, Fingolimod, and Ocrelizumab After Natalizumab Cessation

C. Zhu, T. Kalincik, D. Horakova, Z. Zhou, K. Buzzard, O. Skibina, R. Alroughani, G. Izquierdo, S. Eichau, J. Kuhle, F. Patti, F. Grand'Maison, S. Hodgkinson, P. Grammond, J. Lechner-Scott, E. Butler, A. Prat, M. Girard, P. Duquette, RAL....

. 2023 ; 80 (7) : 739-748. [pub] 2023Jul01

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, multicentrická studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016979

IMPORTANCE: Natalizumab cessation is associated with a risk of rebound disease activity. It is important to identify the optimal switch disease-modifying therapy strategy after natalizumab to limit the risk of severe relapses. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and persistence of dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who discontinued natalizumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this observational cohort study, patient data were collected from the MSBase registry between June 15, 2010, and July 6, 2021. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. This was a multicenter study that included patients with RRMS who had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and then were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months after natalizumab discontinuation. Patients without baseline data were excluded from the analysis. Data were analyzed from May 24, 2022, to January 9, 2023. EXPOSURES: Dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to first relapse. Secondary outcomes were confirmed disability accumulation, disability improvement, and subsequent treatment discontinuation, with the comparisons for the first 2 limited to fingolimod and ocrelizumab due to the small number of patients taking dimethyl fumarate. The associations were analyzed after balancing covariates using an inverse probability of treatment weighting method. RESULTS: Among 66 840 patients with RRMS, 1744 had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months of natalizumab discontinuation. After excluding 358 patients without baseline data, a total of 1386 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [10.6] years; 990 female [71%]) switched to dimethyl fumarate (138 [9.9%]), fingolimod (823 [59.4%]), or ocrelizumab (425 [30.7%]) after natalizumab. The ARR for each medication was as follows: ocrelizumab, 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08); fingolimod, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.48); and dimethyl fumarate, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56). The ARR ratio of fingolimod to ocrelizumab was 4.33 (95% CI, 3.12-6.01) and of dimethyl fumarate to ocrelizumab was 4.50 (95% CI, 2.89-7.03). Compared with ocrelizumab, the hazard ratio (HR) of time to first relapse was 4.02 (95% CI, 2.83-5.70) for fingolimod and 3.70 (95% CI, 2.35-5.84) for dimethyl fumarate. The HR of treatment discontinuation was 2.57 (95% CI, 1.74-3.80) for fingolimod and 4.26 (95% CI, 2.65-6.84) for dimethyl fumarate. Fingolimod use was associated with a 49% higher risk for disability accumulation compared with ocrelizumab. There was no significant difference in disability improvement rates between fingolimod and ocrelizumab. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Study results show that among patients with RRMS who switched from natalizumab to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab, ocrelizumab use was associated with the lowest ARR and discontinuation rates, and the longest time to first relapse.

American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon

Amiri Hospital Sharq Kuwait

Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

Brain and Mind Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia

Buffalo General Medical Center Buffalo New York

Centro Hospitalar Universitario de São João Porto Portugal

Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

CHUM MS Center and Université de Montréal Montréal Québec Canada

CISSS Chaudière Appalache Levis Québec Canada

Clinical Outcomes Research Unit Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels Belgium

CSSS Saint Jérôme Saint Jerome Québec Canada

Department of Neurology Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

Department of Neurology Box Hill Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

Department of Neurology Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

Department of Neuroscience Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Dokuz Eylul University Konak Izmir Turkey

Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia

Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain

KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital Trabzon Turkey

Liverpool Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

Mayis University Samsun Turkey

Monash Medical Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia

Multiple Sclerosis Center University of Catania Catania Italy

Neuro Rive Sud Longueuil Québec Canada

Rehabilitation and MS Centre Overpelt and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Universitary Hospital Ghent Ghent Belgium

University Hospital and University of Basel Basel Switzerland

University Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

University of Western Australia Nedlands Western Australia Australia

Westmead Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard Geleen the Netherlands

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016979
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105350.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1542 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37273217
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Zhu, Chao $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
245    10
$a Comparison Between Dimethyl Fumarate, Fingolimod, and Ocrelizumab After Natalizumab Cessation / $c C. Zhu, T. Kalincik, D. Horakova, Z. Zhou, K. Buzzard, O. Skibina, R. Alroughani, G. Izquierdo, S. Eichau, J. Kuhle, F. Patti, F. Grand'Maison, S. Hodgkinson, P. Grammond, J. Lechner-Scott, E. Butler, A. Prat, M. Girard, P. Duquette, RAL. Macdonell, B. Weinstock-Guttman, S. Ozakbas, M. Slee, MJ. Sa, V. Van Pesch, M. Barnett, B. Van Wijmeersch, O. Gerlach, J. Prevost, M. Terzi, C. Boz, G. Laureys, L. Van Hijfte, AG. Kermode, J. Garber, B. Yamout, SJ. Khoury, D. Merlo, M. Monif, V. Jokubaitis, A. van der Walt, H. Butzkueven, MSBase Study Group
520    9_
$a IMPORTANCE: Natalizumab cessation is associated with a risk of rebound disease activity. It is important to identify the optimal switch disease-modifying therapy strategy after natalizumab to limit the risk of severe relapses. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and persistence of dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who discontinued natalizumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this observational cohort study, patient data were collected from the MSBase registry between June 15, 2010, and July 6, 2021. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. This was a multicenter study that included patients with RRMS who had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and then were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months after natalizumab discontinuation. Patients without baseline data were excluded from the analysis. Data were analyzed from May 24, 2022, to January 9, 2023. EXPOSURES: Dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to first relapse. Secondary outcomes were confirmed disability accumulation, disability improvement, and subsequent treatment discontinuation, with the comparisons for the first 2 limited to fingolimod and ocrelizumab due to the small number of patients taking dimethyl fumarate. The associations were analyzed after balancing covariates using an inverse probability of treatment weighting method. RESULTS: Among 66 840 patients with RRMS, 1744 had used natalizumab for 6 months or longer and were switched to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab within 3 months of natalizumab discontinuation. After excluding 358 patients without baseline data, a total of 1386 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [10.6] years; 990 female [71%]) switched to dimethyl fumarate (138 [9.9%]), fingolimod (823 [59.4%]), or ocrelizumab (425 [30.7%]) after natalizumab. The ARR for each medication was as follows: ocrelizumab, 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08); fingolimod, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.48); and dimethyl fumarate, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56). The ARR ratio of fingolimod to ocrelizumab was 4.33 (95% CI, 3.12-6.01) and of dimethyl fumarate to ocrelizumab was 4.50 (95% CI, 2.89-7.03). Compared with ocrelizumab, the hazard ratio (HR) of time to first relapse was 4.02 (95% CI, 2.83-5.70) for fingolimod and 3.70 (95% CI, 2.35-5.84) for dimethyl fumarate. The HR of treatment discontinuation was 2.57 (95% CI, 1.74-3.80) for fingolimod and 4.26 (95% CI, 2.65-6.84) for dimethyl fumarate. Fingolimod use was associated with a 49% higher risk for disability accumulation compared with ocrelizumab. There was no significant difference in disability improvement rates between fingolimod and ocrelizumab. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Study results show that among patients with RRMS who switched from natalizumab to dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, or ocrelizumab, ocrelizumab use was associated with the lowest ARR and discontinuation rates, and the longest time to first relapse.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a fingolimod hydrochlorid $x terapeutické užití $7 D000068876
650    _2
$a natalizumab $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000069442
650    _2
$a dimethyl fumarát $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000069462
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x farmakoterapie $7 D009364
650    12
$a relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza $x farmakoterapie $7 D020529
650    _2
$a imunosupresiva $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007166
650    _2
$a imunologické faktory $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007155
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kalincik, Tomas $u Clinical Outcomes Research Unit (CORe), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Horakova, Dana $u Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zhou, Zhen $u School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Buzzard, Katherine $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Skibina, Olga $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Alroughani, Raed $u Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait
700    1_
$a Izquierdo, Guillermo $u Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
700    1_
$a Eichau, Sara $u Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
700    1_
$a Kuhle, Jens $u University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Patti, Francesco $u Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
700    1_
$a Grand'Maison, Francois $u Neuro Rive-Sud, Longueuil, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Hodgkinson, Suzanne $u Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
700    1_
$a Grammond, Pierre $u CISSS Chaudière-Appalache, Levis, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Lechner-Scott, Jeannette $u University Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
700    1_
$a Butler, Ernest $u Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Prat, Alexandre $u CHUM MS Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Girard, Marc $u CHUM MS Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Duquette, Pierre $u CHUM MS Center and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Macdonell, Richard A L $u Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca $u Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, New York
700    1_
$a Ozakbas, Serkan $u Dokuz Eylul University, Konak/Izmir, Turkey
700    1_
$a Slee, Mark $u Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
700    1_
$a Sa, Maria Jose $u Centro Hospitalar Universitario de São João, Porto, Portugal
700    1_
$a Van Pesch, Vincent $u Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Barnett, Michael $u Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
700    1_
$a Van Wijmeersch, Bart $u Rehabilitation and MS-Centre Overpelt and Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
700    1_
$a Gerlach, Oliver $u Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Prevost, Julie $u CSSS Saint-Jérôme, Saint-Jerome, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Terzi, Murat $u 19 Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
700    1_
$a Boz, Cavit $u KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
700    1_
$a Laureys, Guy $u Universitary Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Van Hijfte, Liesbeth $u Universitary Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
700    1_
$a Kermode, Allan G $u University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
700    1_
$a Garber, Justin $u Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
700    1_
$a Yamout, Bassem $u American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
700    1_
$a Khoury, Samia J $u American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
700    1_
$a Merlo, Daniel $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Monif, Mastura $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Jokubaitis, Vilija $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a van der Walt, Anneke $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
700    1_
$a Butzkueven, Helmut $u Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia $u Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
710    2_
$a MSBase Study Group
773    0_
$w MED00180402 $t JAMA neurology $x 2168-6157 $g Roč. 80, č. 7 (2023), s. 739-748
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37273217 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105344 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000479 $s 1203341
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 80 $c 7 $d 739-748 $e 2023Jul01 $i 2168-6157 $m JAMA Neurology $n JAMA Neurol $x MED00180402
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...