-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Impact of Timing on Palatal Shape
A. Brudnicki, T. Petrova, I. Dubovska, AM. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Y. Ren, PS. Fudalej
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2012
PubMed Central
od 2012
Europe PubMed Central
od 2012
ProQuest Central
od 2019-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2019-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2012
PubMed
38137587
DOI
10.3390/jcm12247519
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a critical surgical intervention in patients with a cleft of the alveolus, aimed at reconstructing the alveolar ridge to facilitate proper eruption, periodontal support, and alignment of adjacent permanent teeth. The optimal timing for ABG remains debated, with late secondary ABG between the ages of 9 and 11 being widely adopted. This study compared the palatal shapes of 28 children at a mean age of 9.5 years (SD = 0.7) who underwent early secondary ABG at a mean age of 2.1 years (SD = 0.6) or 33 children at a mean age of 10.8 years (SD = 1.5) who underwent late secondary ABG at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.3) to 60 non-cleft controls at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.2). The palatal shapes were captured with 239 landmarks digitized on the palate on a digital model. Utilizing geometric morphometric methods, i.e., generalized Procrustes superimpositions, principal component analysis, and permutation tests, we assessed the impact of ABG timing on palatal morphology. The first five principal components (PCs) explained 64.1% of the total shape variability: PC1 = 26.1%; PC2 = 12%; PC3 = 11.9%; PC4 = 7.8%; and PC5 = 6.4%. The Procrustes distance between both cleft groups and the control group was more than twice as large as the Procrustes distance between the early ABG and late ABG groups. Nonetheless, all intergroup differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that early ABG has a limited negative effect on palatal shape, providing comparable outcomes to late ABG. The study highlights the potential suitability of early ABG, challenging conventional practices and encouraging further exploration into its long-term effects on maxillary growth.
Department of Orthodontics Jagiellonian University in Cracow 31 007 Krakow Poland
Department of Pediatric Surgery Institute of Mother and Child 01 211 Warsaw Poland
Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Indonesia Campus Salemba Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23022374
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240116163023.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240105s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jcm12247519 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38137587
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Brudnicki, Andrzej $u Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190421842
- 245 10
- $a Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Impact of Timing on Palatal Shape / $c A. Brudnicki, T. Petrova, I. Dubovska, AM. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Y. Ren, PS. Fudalej
- 520 9_
- $a Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a critical surgical intervention in patients with a cleft of the alveolus, aimed at reconstructing the alveolar ridge to facilitate proper eruption, periodontal support, and alignment of adjacent permanent teeth. The optimal timing for ABG remains debated, with late secondary ABG between the ages of 9 and 11 being widely adopted. This study compared the palatal shapes of 28 children at a mean age of 9.5 years (SD = 0.7) who underwent early secondary ABG at a mean age of 2.1 years (SD = 0.6) or 33 children at a mean age of 10.8 years (SD = 1.5) who underwent late secondary ABG at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.3) to 60 non-cleft controls at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.2). The palatal shapes were captured with 239 landmarks digitized on the palate on a digital model. Utilizing geometric morphometric methods, i.e., generalized Procrustes superimpositions, principal component analysis, and permutation tests, we assessed the impact of ABG timing on palatal morphology. The first five principal components (PCs) explained 64.1% of the total shape variability: PC1 = 26.1%; PC2 = 12%; PC3 = 11.9%; PC4 = 7.8%; and PC5 = 6.4%. The Procrustes distance between both cleft groups and the control group was more than twice as large as the Procrustes distance between the early ABG and late ABG groups. Nonetheless, all intergroup differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that early ABG has a limited negative effect on palatal shape, providing comparable outcomes to late ABG. The study highlights the potential suitability of early ABG, challenging conventional practices and encouraging further exploration into its long-term effects on maxillary growth.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Petrova, Tereza $u Department of Orthodontics and Cleft Anomalies, 3rd Medical Faculty, Faculty Hospital Royal Vineard, Dental Clinic, Charles University, 11636 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dubovska, Ivana $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000318816844 $7 xx0247576
- 700 1_
- $a Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie $u Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland $u Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Campus Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181720090
- 700 1_
- $a Ren, Yijin $u Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000223741771
- 700 1_
- $a Fudalej, Piotr S $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland $u Department of Orthodontics, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, 31-007 Krakow, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187777434
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 12, č. 24 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38137587 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240116163020 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2036260 $s 1208819
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 12 $c 24 $e 20231205 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240105