Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Impact of Timing on Palatal Shape

A. Brudnicki, T. Petrova, I. Dubovska, AM. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Y. Ren, PS. Fudalej

. 2023 ; 12 (24) : . [pub] 20231205

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23022374

Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a critical surgical intervention in patients with a cleft of the alveolus, aimed at reconstructing the alveolar ridge to facilitate proper eruption, periodontal support, and alignment of adjacent permanent teeth. The optimal timing for ABG remains debated, with late secondary ABG between the ages of 9 and 11 being widely adopted. This study compared the palatal shapes of 28 children at a mean age of 9.5 years (SD = 0.7) who underwent early secondary ABG at a mean age of 2.1 years (SD = 0.6) or 33 children at a mean age of 10.8 years (SD = 1.5) who underwent late secondary ABG at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.3) to 60 non-cleft controls at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.2). The palatal shapes were captured with 239 landmarks digitized on the palate on a digital model. Utilizing geometric morphometric methods, i.e., generalized Procrustes superimpositions, principal component analysis, and permutation tests, we assessed the impact of ABG timing on palatal morphology. The first five principal components (PCs) explained 64.1% of the total shape variability: PC1 = 26.1%; PC2 = 12%; PC3 = 11.9%; PC4 = 7.8%; and PC5 = 6.4%. The Procrustes distance between both cleft groups and the control group was more than twice as large as the Procrustes distance between the early ABG and late ABG groups. Nonetheless, all intergroup differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that early ABG has a limited negative effect on palatal shape, providing comparable outcomes to late ABG. The study highlights the potential suitability of early ABG, challenging conventional practices and encouraging further exploration into its long-term effects on maxillary growth.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23022374
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240116163023.0
007      
ta
008      
240105s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/jcm12247519 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38137587
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Brudnicki, Andrzej $u Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190421842
245    10
$a Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Impact of Timing on Palatal Shape / $c A. Brudnicki, T. Petrova, I. Dubovska, AM. Kuijpers-Jagtman, Y. Ren, PS. Fudalej
520    9_
$a Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a critical surgical intervention in patients with a cleft of the alveolus, aimed at reconstructing the alveolar ridge to facilitate proper eruption, periodontal support, and alignment of adjacent permanent teeth. The optimal timing for ABG remains debated, with late secondary ABG between the ages of 9 and 11 being widely adopted. This study compared the palatal shapes of 28 children at a mean age of 9.5 years (SD = 0.7) who underwent early secondary ABG at a mean age of 2.1 years (SD = 0.6) or 33 children at a mean age of 10.8 years (SD = 1.5) who underwent late secondary ABG at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.3) to 60 non-cleft controls at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.2). The palatal shapes were captured with 239 landmarks digitized on the palate on a digital model. Utilizing geometric morphometric methods, i.e., generalized Procrustes superimpositions, principal component analysis, and permutation tests, we assessed the impact of ABG timing on palatal morphology. The first five principal components (PCs) explained 64.1% of the total shape variability: PC1 = 26.1%; PC2 = 12%; PC3 = 11.9%; PC4 = 7.8%; and PC5 = 6.4%. The Procrustes distance between both cleft groups and the control group was more than twice as large as the Procrustes distance between the early ABG and late ABG groups. Nonetheless, all intergroup differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that early ABG has a limited negative effect on palatal shape, providing comparable outcomes to late ABG. The study highlights the potential suitability of early ABG, challenging conventional practices and encouraging further exploration into its long-term effects on maxillary growth.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Petrova, Tereza $u Department of Orthodontics and Cleft Anomalies, 3rd Medical Faculty, Faculty Hospital Royal Vineard, Dental Clinic, Charles University, 11636 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dubovska, Ivana $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000318816844 $7 xx0247576
700    1_
$a Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie $u Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland $u Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Campus Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181720090
700    1_
$a Ren, Yijin $u Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000223741771
700    1_
$a Fudalej, Piotr S $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland $u Department of Orthodontics, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, 31-007 Krakow, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187777434
773    0_
$w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 12, č. 24 (2023)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38137587 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240116163020 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2036260 $s 1208819
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 12 $c 24 $e 20231205 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...