-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients
A. Zelko, I. Skoumalova, D. Kravcova, Z. Dankulincova Veselska, J. Rosenberger, A. Madarasova Geckova, JP. van Dijk, SA. Reijneveld
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2013-01-01
ProQuest Central
od 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Taylor & Francis Open Access
od 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2015-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- cvičení * psychologie MeSH
- dialýza ledvin * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- postoj zdravotnického personálu MeSH
- sebeuplatnění MeSH
- zdravotnický personál MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines call for the inclusion of exercise interventions in every patient's dialysis session, but these recommendations are rarely adopted. Healthcare providers play a key role in this. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how healthcare providers perceive the benefits, risks and barriers of intradialytic exercise (IDE). METHODS: We conducted 21 individual, semi-structured interviews with 11 nurses, 5 nephrologists, 3 training assistants and 2 managers from two dialysis centres in Slovakia. Verbatim transcripts of digitally recorded interviews were thematically analysed using MAXQDA®. RESULTS: Participants reported the benefits of IDE as improvements in patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, independence and self-efficacy, clinical profile and quality of therapy. As risks of IDE, they most frequently reported exercise-related damage to vascular access, insufficient individualization of training and musculoskeletal injuries. The presence of psychological problems among patients was reported as a major barrier for initiating and maintaining patients' exercise. Other reported barriers included limitations in financial and personnel resources of haemodialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: Safe and sustainable implementation of IDE, which might improve a patient's well-being, need to be prescribed in alignment with the patient's clinical profile, be delivered individually according to the patient's characteristics and requires adjustments in the available resources.
Fresenius Medical Care Dialysis Services Kosice Kosice Slovakia
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000058
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213092940.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/17482631.2023.2287597 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38055756
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zelko, Aurel $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196822225 $7 xx0307368
- 245 10
- $a Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients / $c A. Zelko, I. Skoumalova, D. Kravcova, Z. Dankulincova Veselska, J. Rosenberger, A. Madarasova Geckova, JP. van Dijk, SA. Reijneveld
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines call for the inclusion of exercise interventions in every patient's dialysis session, but these recommendations are rarely adopted. Healthcare providers play a key role in this. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how healthcare providers perceive the benefits, risks and barriers of intradialytic exercise (IDE). METHODS: We conducted 21 individual, semi-structured interviews with 11 nurses, 5 nephrologists, 3 training assistants and 2 managers from two dialysis centres in Slovakia. Verbatim transcripts of digitally recorded interviews were thematically analysed using MAXQDA®. RESULTS: Participants reported the benefits of IDE as improvements in patients' physical and psychosocial functioning, independence and self-efficacy, clinical profile and quality of therapy. As risks of IDE, they most frequently reported exercise-related damage to vascular access, insufficient individualization of training and musculoskeletal injuries. The presence of psychological problems among patients was reported as a major barrier for initiating and maintaining patients' exercise. Other reported barriers included limitations in financial and personnel resources of haemodialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: Safe and sustainable implementation of IDE, which might improve a patient's well-being, need to be prescribed in alignment with the patient's clinical profile, be delivered individually according to the patient's characteristics and requires adjustments in the available resources.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a dialýza ledvin $7 D006435
- 650 12
- $a cvičení $x psychologie $7 D015444
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotnický personál $7 D006282
- 650 _2
- $a postoj zdravotnického personálu $7 D001291
- 650 _2
- $a sebeuplatnění $7 D020377
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Skoumalova, Ivana $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000168934158
- 700 1_
- $a Kravcova, Denisa $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Dankulincova Veselska, Zuzana $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000175992196
- 700 1_
- $a Rosenberger, Jaroslav $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Fresenius Medical Care - Dialysis Services Kosice, Kosice, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/000000017201889X $7 xx0107298
- 700 1_
- $a Madarasova Geckova, Andrea $u Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000329933798 $7 xx0061252
- 700 1_
- $a van Dijk, Jitse P $u Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000302256811
- 700 1_
- $a Reijneveld, Sijmen A $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000212067523
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176252 $t International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being $x 1748-2631 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2024), s. 2287597
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38055756 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213092937 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049018 $s 1209752
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 19 $c 1 $d 2287597 $e 20231206 $i 1748-2631 $m International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being $n Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being $x MED00176252
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109