• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Serum identification of at-risk MASH: The metabolomics-advanced steatohepatitis fibrosis score (MASEF)

M. Noureddin, E. Truong, R. Mayo, I. Martínez-Arranz, I. Mincholé, JM. Banales, M. Arrese, K. Cusi, MT. Arias-Loste, R. Bruha, M. Romero-Gómez, P. Iruzubieta, R. Aller, J. Ampuero, JL. Calleja, L. Ibañez-Samaniego, P. Aspichueta, A. Martín-Duce,...

. 2024 ; 79 (1) : 135-148. [pub] 20230724

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000163

BACKGROUND: Early identification of those with NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 and significant fibrosis (≥F2) or at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a priority as these patients are at increased risk for disease progression and may benefit from therapies. We developed and validated a highly specific metabolomics-driven score to identify at-risk MASH. METHODS: We included derivation (n = 790) and validation (n = 565) cohorts from international tertiary centers. Patients underwent laboratory assessment and liver biopsy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Based on 12 lipids, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, the MASEF score was developed to identify at-risk MASH and compared to the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score. We further compared the performance of a FIB-4 + MASEF algorithm to that of FIB-4 + liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the MASEF score showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.79), 0.69, 0.74, 0.53, and 0.85 in the derivation cohort, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), 0.78, 0.65, 0.48, and 0.88 in the validation cohort, while FibroScan-AST performance in the validation cohort was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.79; p = 0.064), 0.58, 0.79, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. FIB-4+MASEF showed similar overall performance compared with FIB-4 + LSM by VCTE ( p = 0.69) to identify at-risk MASH. CONCLUSION: MASEF is a promising diagnostic tool for the assessment of at-risk MASH. It could be used alternatively to LSM by VCTE in the algorithm that is currently recommended by several guidance publications.

Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain

Biodonostia Research Institute Donostia University Hospital University of the Basque Country CIBERehd IKERBASQUE Donostia Spain

CIC bioGUNE Basque Research and Technology Alliance Derio Spain

Clinic University Hospital University of Valladolid Valladolid Spain

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics School of Sciences University of Navarra Pamplona Spain

Department of Gastroenterology School of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile

Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine and Nursing University of the Basque Country UPV EHU Leioa Spain

Division of Liver Diseases Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York City New York USA

General University Hospital and the 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Gregorio Marañón University Hospital Madrid Spain

Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Research Institute Houston Texas USA

Houston Research Institute Houston Texas USA

Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Cedars Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA

Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital Cantabria University IDIVAL Santander Spain

National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Madrid Spain

OWL Metabolomics Derio Spain

Pinnacle Clinical Research San Antonio Texas USA

Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital Alcalá University Madrid Spain

Puerta del Hierro University Hospital Madrid Spain

Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom

University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

Valme University Hospital CIBERehd Seville Spain

Virgen del Rocío University Hospital Sevilla Spain

Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center Richmond Virginia USA

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000163
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093008.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000542 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37505221
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Noureddin, Mazen $u Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Research Institute Houston, Texas, USA $u Houston Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321272040
245    10
$a Serum identification of at-risk MASH: The metabolomics-advanced steatohepatitis fibrosis score (MASEF) / $c M. Noureddin, E. Truong, R. Mayo, I. Martínez-Arranz, I. Mincholé, JM. Banales, M. Arrese, K. Cusi, MT. Arias-Loste, R. Bruha, M. Romero-Gómez, P. Iruzubieta, R. Aller, J. Ampuero, JL. Calleja, L. Ibañez-Samaniego, P. Aspichueta, A. Martín-Duce, T. Kushner, P. Ortiz, SA. Harrison, QM. Anstee, J. Crespo, JM. Mato, AJ. Sanyal
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Early identification of those with NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 and significant fibrosis (≥F2) or at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a priority as these patients are at increased risk for disease progression and may benefit from therapies. We developed and validated a highly specific metabolomics-driven score to identify at-risk MASH. METHODS: We included derivation (n = 790) and validation (n = 565) cohorts from international tertiary centers. Patients underwent laboratory assessment and liver biopsy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Based on 12 lipids, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, the MASEF score was developed to identify at-risk MASH and compared to the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score. We further compared the performance of a FIB-4 + MASEF algorithm to that of FIB-4 + liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the MASEF score showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.79), 0.69, 0.74, 0.53, and 0.85 in the derivation cohort, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), 0.78, 0.65, 0.48, and 0.88 in the validation cohort, while FibroScan-AST performance in the validation cohort was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.79; p = 0.064), 0.58, 0.79, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. FIB-4+MASEF showed similar overall performance compared with FIB-4 + LSM by VCTE ( p = 0.69) to identify at-risk MASH. CONCLUSION: MASEF is a promising diagnostic tool for the assessment of at-risk MASH. It could be used alternatively to LSM by VCTE in the algorithm that is currently recommended by several guidance publications.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a játra $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D008099
650    _2
$a jaterní cirhóza $x patologie $7 D008103
650    12
$a nealkoholová steatóza jater $x patologie $7 D065626
650    _2
$a fibróza $7 D005355
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    12
$a elastografie $7 D054459
650    _2
$a biopsie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001706
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Truong, Emily $u Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000291673299
700    1_
$a Mayo, Rebeca $u OWL Metabolomics, Derio, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000197332121
700    1_
$a Martínez-Arranz, Ibon $u OWL Metabolomics, Derio, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000194838426
700    1_
$a Mincholé, Itziar $u OWL Metabolomics, Derio, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000157074359
700    1_
$a Banales, Jesus M $u Biodonostia Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), CIBERehd, IKERBASQUE, Donostia, Spain $u Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000252242373
700    1_
$a Arrese, Marco $u Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
700    1_
$a Cusi, Kenneth $u University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
700    1_
$a Arias-Loste, María Teresa $u Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria University, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
700    1_
$a Bruha, Radan $u General University Hospital and the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Romero-Gómez, Manuel $u Valme University Hospital, CIBERehd, Seville, Spain
700    1_
$a Iruzubieta, Paula $u Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria University, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000194761801
700    1_
$a Aller, Rocio $u Clinic University Hospital, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
700    1_
$a Ampuero, Javier $u Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
700    1_
$a Calleja, José Luis $u Puerta del Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222656591
700    1_
$a Ibañez-Samaniego, Luis $u Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Aspichueta, Patricia $u Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain $u Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain $u National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases (CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Martín-Duce, Antonio $u Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187519224
700    1_
$a Kushner, Tatyana $u Division of Liver Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Ortiz, Pablo $u OWL Metabolomics, Derio, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000226988470
700    1_
$a Harrison, Stephen A $u Pinnacle Clinical Research, San Antonio, Texas, USA
700    1_
$a Anstee, Quentin M $u Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000295180088
700    1_
$a Crespo, Javier $u Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria University, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000182480172
700    1_
$a Mato, José M $u National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases (CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Madrid, Spain $u CIC bioGUNE, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000312643153
700    1_
$a Sanyal, Arun J $u Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000186825748
773    0_
$w MED00009806 $t Hepatology $x 1527-3350 $g Roč. 79, č. 1 (2024), s. 135-148
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37505221 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093005 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049071 $s 1209857
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 79 $c 1 $d 135-148 $e 20230724 $i 1527-3350 $m Hepatology $n Hepatology $x MED00009806
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...