-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group
AM. Kamat, AB. Apolo, M. Babjuk, TJ. Bivalacqua, PC. Black, R. Buckley, MT. Campbell, E. Compérat, JA. Efstathiou, P. Grivas, S. Gupta, NJ. Kurtz, D. Lamm, SP. Lerner, R. Li, DJ. McConkey, J. Palou Redorta, T. Powles, SP. Psutka, N. Shore, GD....
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
PubMed
37793077
DOI
10.1200/jco.23.00307
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunoterapie MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * MeSH
- klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.
Carolina Urologic Research Center Myrtle Beach SC
Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute NIH Bethesda MD
Clinical Research Division Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA
Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland OH
Department of Medicine Division of Oncology University of Washington
Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Department of Urology Fundació Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Urology North York General Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
Department of Urology Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL
Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX
Department of Urology University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA
Division of Urology Department of Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA
EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel Arnhem the Netherlands
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Institute New York NY
Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD
Patient Advocate Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Bethesda MD
Queen Mary University of London London United Kingdom
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Scott Department of Urology Dan L Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000271
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093036.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1200/JCO.23.00307 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37793077
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kamat, Ashish M $u Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX $1 https://orcid.org/0000000335469928
- 245 10
- $a Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group / $c AM. Kamat, AB. Apolo, M. Babjuk, TJ. Bivalacqua, PC. Black, R. Buckley, MT. Campbell, E. Compérat, JA. Efstathiou, P. Grivas, S. Gupta, NJ. Kurtz, D. Lamm, SP. Lerner, R. Li, DJ. McConkey, J. Palou Redorta, T. Powles, SP. Psutka, N. Shore, GD. Steinberg, R. Sylvester, JA. Witjes, MD. Galsky
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x patologie $7 D001749
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvancia imunologická $x terapeutické užití $7 D000276
- 650 12
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $7 D002295
- 650 _2
- $a imunoterapie $7 D007167
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Apolo, Andrea B $u Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD $1 https://orcid.org/0000000194091836
- 700 1_
- $a Babjuk, Marek $u Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000231157428
- 700 1_
- $a Bivalacqua, Trinity J $u Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Black, Peter C $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000229197068
- 700 1_
- $a Buckley, Roger $u Department of Urology, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Campbell, Matthew T $u Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX $1 https://orcid.org/0000000319154491
- 700 1_
- $a Compérat, Eva $u Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Efstathiou, Jason A $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000309960350
- 700 1_
- $a Grivas, Petros $u Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339653394
- 700 1_
- $a Gupta, Shilpa $u Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH $1 https://orcid.org/000000028775503X
- 700 1_
- $a Kurtz, Neil J $u Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
- 700 1_
- $a Lamm, Donald $u Patient Advocate, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN), Bethesda, MD
- 700 1_
- $a Lerner, Seth P $u BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ $1 https://orcid.org/0000000263792581
- 700 1_
- $a Li, Roger $u Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX $1 https://orcid.org/0000000312747200
- 700 1_
- $a McConkey, David J $u Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- 700 1_
- $a Palou Redorta, Joan $u Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- 700 1_
- $a Powles, Thomas $u Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000177604724
- 700 1_
- $a Psutka, Sarah P $u Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000242077490
- 700 1_
- $a Shore, Neal $u Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000157670548
- 700 1_
- $a Steinberg, Gary D $u Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
- 700 1_
- $a Sylvester, Richard $u Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL $1 https://orcid.org/000000030529862X
- 700 1_
- $a Witjes, J Alfred $u EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Galsky, Matthew D $u Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000176559378
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002596 $t Journal of clinical oncology $x 1527-7755 $g Roč. 41, č. 35 (2023), s. 5437-5447
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37793077 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093033 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049123 $s 1209965
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 41 $c 35 $d 5437-5447 $e 20231004 $i 1527-7755 $m Journal of clinical oncology $n J. clin. Oncol. $x MED00002596
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109