-
Something wrong with this record ?
Automatic caries detection in bitewing radiographs: part I-deep learning
L. Kunt, J. Kybic, V. Nagyová, A. Tichý
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000765
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
GIP-21-SL-01-232
Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Deep Learning * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Dental Caries Susceptibility MeSH
- Neural Networks, Computer MeSH
- Dental Caries * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to assemble a large annotated dataset of bitewing radiographs and to use convolutional neural networks to automate the detection of dental caries in bitewing radiographs with human-level performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset of 3989 bitewing radiographs was created, and 7257 carious lesions were annotated using minimal bounding boxes. The dataset was then divided into 3 parts for the training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) of multiple object detection convolutional neural networks (CNN). The tested CNN architectures included YOLOv5, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and EfficientDet. To further improve the detection performance, model ensembling was used, and nested predictions were removed during post-processing. The models were compared in terms of the [Formula: see text] score and average precision (AP) with various thresholds of the intersection over union (IoU). RESULTS: The twelve tested architectures had [Formula: see text] scores of 0.72-0.76. Their performance was improved by ensembling which increased the [Formula: see text] score to 0.79-0.80. The best-performing ensemble detected caries with the precision of 0.83, recall of 0.77, [Formula: see text], and AP of 0.86 at IoU=0.5. Small carious lesions were predicted with slightly lower accuracy (AP 0.82) than medium or large lesions (AP 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The trained ensemble of object detection CNNs detected caries with satisfactory accuracy and performed at least as well as experienced dentists (see companion paper, Part II). The performance on small lesions was likely limited by inconsistencies in the training dataset. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Caries can be automatically detected using convolutional neural networks. However, detecting incipient carious lesions remains challenging.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000358
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093128.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00784-023-05335-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37968358
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Kunt, Lukáš $u Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Automatic caries detection in bitewing radiographs: part I-deep learning / $c L. Kunt, J. Kybic, V. Nagyová, A. Tichý
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to assemble a large annotated dataset of bitewing radiographs and to use convolutional neural networks to automate the detection of dental caries in bitewing radiographs with human-level performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset of 3989 bitewing radiographs was created, and 7257 carious lesions were annotated using minimal bounding boxes. The dataset was then divided into 3 parts for the training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) of multiple object detection convolutional neural networks (CNN). The tested CNN architectures included YOLOv5, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and EfficientDet. To further improve the detection performance, model ensembling was used, and nested predictions were removed during post-processing. The models were compared in terms of the [Formula: see text] score and average precision (AP) with various thresholds of the intersection over union (IoU). RESULTS: The twelve tested architectures had [Formula: see text] scores of 0.72-0.76. Their performance was improved by ensembling which increased the [Formula: see text] score to 0.79-0.80. The best-performing ensemble detected caries with the precision of 0.83, recall of 0.77, [Formula: see text], and AP of 0.86 at IoU=0.5. Small carious lesions were predicted with slightly lower accuracy (AP 0.82) than medium or large lesions (AP 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The trained ensemble of object detection CNNs detected caries with satisfactory accuracy and performed at least as well as experienced dentists (see companion paper, Part II). The performance on small lesions was likely limited by inconsistencies in the training dataset. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Caries can be automatically detected using convolutional neural networks. However, detecting incipient carious lesions remains challenging.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a deep learning $7 D000077321
- 650 12
- $a zubní kaz $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D003731
- 650 _2
- $a náchylnost k zubnímu kazu $7 D003733
- 650 _2
- $a neuronové sítě $7 D016571
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kybic, Jan $u Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. kybic@fel.cvut.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Nagyová, Valéria $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tichý, Antonín $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005714 $t Clinical oral investigations $x 1436-3771 $g Roč. 27, č. 12 (2023), s. 7463-7471
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37968358 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093125 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049178 $s 1210052
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 27 $c 12 $d 7463-7471 $e 20231116 $i 1436-3771 $m Clinical oral investigations $n Clin Oral Investig $x MED00005714
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000765 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- GRA __
- $a GIP-21-SL-01-232 $p Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109