Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Automatic caries detection in bitewing radiographs: part I-deep learning

L. Kunt, J. Kybic, V. Nagyová, A. Tichý

. 2023 ; 27 (12) : 7463-7471. [pub] 20231116

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000765 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
GIP-21-SL-01-232 Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to assemble a large annotated dataset of bitewing radiographs and to use convolutional neural networks to automate the detection of dental caries in bitewing radiographs with human-level performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset of 3989 bitewing radiographs was created, and 7257 carious lesions were annotated using minimal bounding boxes. The dataset was then divided into 3 parts for the training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) of multiple object detection convolutional neural networks (CNN). The tested CNN architectures included YOLOv5, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and EfficientDet. To further improve the detection performance, model ensembling was used, and nested predictions were removed during post-processing. The models were compared in terms of the [Formula: see text] score and average precision (AP) with various thresholds of the intersection over union (IoU). RESULTS: The twelve tested architectures had [Formula: see text] scores of 0.72-0.76. Their performance was improved by ensembling which increased the [Formula: see text] score to 0.79-0.80. The best-performing ensemble detected caries with the precision of 0.83, recall of 0.77, [Formula: see text], and AP of 0.86 at IoU=0.5. Small carious lesions were predicted with slightly lower accuracy (AP 0.82) than medium or large lesions (AP 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The trained ensemble of object detection CNNs detected caries with satisfactory accuracy and performed at least as well as experienced dentists (see companion paper, Part II). The performance on small lesions was likely limited by inconsistencies in the training dataset. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Caries can be automatically detected using convolutional neural networks. However, detecting incipient carious lesions remains challenging.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000358
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093128.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00784-023-05335-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37968358
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kunt, Lukáš $u Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Automatic caries detection in bitewing radiographs: part I-deep learning / $c L. Kunt, J. Kybic, V. Nagyová, A. Tichý
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to assemble a large annotated dataset of bitewing radiographs and to use convolutional neural networks to automate the detection of dental caries in bitewing radiographs with human-level performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset of 3989 bitewing radiographs was created, and 7257 carious lesions were annotated using minimal bounding boxes. The dataset was then divided into 3 parts for the training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) of multiple object detection convolutional neural networks (CNN). The tested CNN architectures included YOLOv5, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and EfficientDet. To further improve the detection performance, model ensembling was used, and nested predictions were removed during post-processing. The models were compared in terms of the [Formula: see text] score and average precision (AP) with various thresholds of the intersection over union (IoU). RESULTS: The twelve tested architectures had [Formula: see text] scores of 0.72-0.76. Their performance was improved by ensembling which increased the [Formula: see text] score to 0.79-0.80. The best-performing ensemble detected caries with the precision of 0.83, recall of 0.77, [Formula: see text], and AP of 0.86 at IoU=0.5. Small carious lesions were predicted with slightly lower accuracy (AP 0.82) than medium or large lesions (AP 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The trained ensemble of object detection CNNs detected caries with satisfactory accuracy and performed at least as well as experienced dentists (see companion paper, Part II). The performance on small lesions was likely limited by inconsistencies in the training dataset. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Caries can be automatically detected using convolutional neural networks. However, detecting incipient carious lesions remains challenging.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a deep learning $7 D000077321
650    12
$a zubní kaz $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D003731
650    _2
$a náchylnost k zubnímu kazu $7 D003733
650    _2
$a neuronové sítě $7 D016571
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kybic, Jan $u Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. kybic@fel.cvut.cz
700    1_
$a Nagyová, Valéria $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tichý, Antonín $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00005714 $t Clinical oral investigations $x 1436-3771 $g Roč. 27, č. 12 (2023), s. 7463-7471
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37968358 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093125 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049178 $s 1210052
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 27 $c 12 $d 7463-7471 $e 20231116 $i 1436-3771 $m Clinical oral investigations $n Clin Oral Investig $x MED00005714
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000765 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
GRA    __
$a GIP-21-SL-01-232 $p Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...